19 Jun 2018 14:06:10
Cummings and jones both get a big fat no from me.

1.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 14:12:21
Thanks for your input, thanks for your input, I was worried about your opinion

2.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 15:15:14
Jones is a good wee player especially on the counter he made Celtic defense look silly last year

3.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 15:21:25
Why is it that fellow fans are f*kin down right nasty to our own. We all have opinions on all things about our club, some positive, some negative. Some might say things as the OP and a 99% might disagree but why be nasty or sarcastic. We are the same, we support the same club, we all want what’s best for Glasgow Rangers. i'm sick of all the bitching between some on here. 😤

4.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 15:27:20
Jones yes cummings i'm 50/ 50

5.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 15:36:09
Think both would improve our squad. Doubt they would be first 11 but both are young with potential. Remember if we manage to get through to the group stages of the Europa league we will be looking at around 60 games this season. We clearly need a lot of additions to bring our squad up to a standard that makes us competitive in all competition. I see both of these signings low risk due to cost, age and experience already in our League.

6.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 16:24:24
Well said colster spot on mate, it's getting bloody annoying, I think there will be a few on here dreading sharing any rumours they here in fear of being attacked by these unnecessary comments! Cummings and Jones coming in would be nothing but a plus in my opinion, like whosthedado said we will need a large enough squad to deal with a long hard season if we do manage to get far in Europe, not just Europe either, all the cup games in between league games too, plus they are both decent players, I think Cummings criticism is unfair, remember he was playing (when given the odd chance) in that flawed system and manager so what was he supposed to do? Given a real chance AND having clear instructions will help him a lot!

7.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 17:04:14
Expecting us to sign better if I am honest. A lot better. Both are middle of the road SPFL players.

8.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 17:08:02
I'd take them both as long as they were cheap. They will give us more strength in squad depth

9.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 17:20:26
Daz my whole point is you can have a different opinion about a post, you just don’t have to be a d*ck about it. However I’ve read a few of Tommy’s posts down the page a bit and he is either from mhankyville or he is just being a total ar*e. Your right mate, posters will stop putting stuff up for fear of abuse. We all here some snippets and probably 99.9% are guff but I like the not knowing. I have no doubt we have Aliens in our midst who sign up to our page to disagree with every post and talk sh*te to get a reaction. that's up to them but when our own give abuse to one another that is poor in my book. 👍🏻

10.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 17:27:16
In my opinion neither Cummings or jones are good enough and I’ll explain why. You say that they would be good squad players or would improve the squad. However that is not what we need. We need players that will improve the starting eleven and therefore make the current starting players the ‘squad players’. And if you look at the signings so far each of them should do that. Macgregor is an improvement on foderignham, Arfield an improvement on the likes of Dorrans or Holt or Halliday of Docherty, and Gouldson and Klatic should be improvements on Bates and Martin. Why spend money on players that aren’t likely to be near to being first choice? Spend it on players ready to go into the first team, with current first teamers who aren’t good enough becoming the back up.
The way I’m looking at it is, would either of these players get near celtics first team squad? No. Then how are they going to improve us enough to get us challenging them for the league.
(Ps I’m not getting at anyone or slagging anyone off, it’s merely my opinion)

11.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 17:42:12
Daz and colster well pointed out guys!
I'm with you 200% on this.

12.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 18:30:12
The point about the team/ squad for the new season is that we shouldn't be looking to sign players that are only better than we already have, but players who can match or better what that mob have. Could that be said of Jones or Cummings, i don't think so!

13.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 19:50:43
As it is I don’t think we are really interested in either of them. Maybe they are on a list of possibilities but I’d think only if we don’t get who ever our first or second choices are. Basically the journalists have no idea who we are after so are just dropping in the ‘usual suspects’ or names that have been previously mention in order to fill column inches.

14.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 19:52:14
To be fair there are a few really thick comments from time to time that really should not be uttered outside the pub on a Saturday.

When it comes to players, we all have our own opinion but they should be badges on some kind of reality. ie Ronaldo ain’t coming!

Cummings? For me, he was too lightweight and I don’t think he is the answer but if SG brings him in for a lesser fee than that agreed, I’ll get right behind him.

15.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 20:59:16
Posters do give abuse and I’ve given and had my fair share of it however no one should be worried about putting their views across. Me and old supercooper have had a few scraps but I recognise his support for the team

16.) 19 Jun 2018
19 Jun 2018 21:31:02
Here here ArthurD, spot on mate, we all want what's best for the famous glasgow rangers! Of course there's going to be a range of different opinions! that's what makes it very interesting, within reason of course!

17.) 20 Jun 2018
20 Jun 2018 06:14:29
On Jones I ask if we really need him, we have Murphy, Middleton why would we need Jones?