14 Oct 2023 13:01:26
I see rangers have agreed all personal terms/ contracts etc with both kevin muscat and philipe clement ? So everything is ready to go and smooth transition, once rangers decide on their preferred no.1 candidate, which should be decided within the next couple of days ?Not long to wait now bears ?.

1.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 14:09:24
Sorry mate but why would we agree personal terms with two candidates? Not saying you're wrong but it just sounds a bit strange to me.

2.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 14:16:10
Where did you see that? Seems strange they would agree deals with both doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.

3.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 14:37:05
Is this from a source sws?

4.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 15:02:14
A few postings on Rangers Banter more or less stating that Muscat is going to be the new man.

5.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 15:11:21
Daily Rag click bait.

6.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 15:16:24
Reports in the press state what Sir Walter is saying.

7.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 15:27:14
The press don’t know what is happening, we have not agreed contracts with two people.

8.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 15:27:22
It's out there for all to read guys ?.

9.) 14 Oct 2023
14 oct 2023 15:57:12
terms were apparently agreed sone time ago, with more than one candidate coops, i'm told wages weren't an issue, transfer cash might be though.

10.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 16:32:34
I really hope we don't pick an option because they are the cheapest
We need too be picking the best option on merit and what he can bring and do too improve our squad besle was the cheap option and also a returning associate of the club, hence why I have my doubts
Mcoist
Van
Beale
Then if muscat

Let's change it n go for someone outwith the boundaries we are used to which a proven record and decree of success

Not just settle on an ex player

As they may b3 the cheapest option

N Muscat could be our man n great for us

But I think we have failed too many times

We are an institution
We where feared
Let's get it right n get it back.

11.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 16:49:46
Agreed contracts with the 2 guys? Why on earth would we do that.

12.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 16:54:28
Honestly, why would we agree personal terms and contracts with 2 candidates - what is the point in that. You select your preferred candidate and then agree personal terms, contracts etc. Not at the same time and then flip a coin to see who should get the job. The board are keeping this one close to their chest and the media hate it, so are printing any old nonsense.

13.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 17:00:56
Probably agreed in principle.

14.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 17:05:35
Maybe both their contracts are acceptable with the club and managers, the club would stop the procedure if the package they wanted was too much, by the sounds of it it’s just down to picking who they want with everything else agreed upon, that’s what I took from Sir Walters comment ??‍♂️??.

15.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 17:21:59
Clement is going to cost us way more than Muscat in wages, his and his teams contract assurances and in transfer expectations. Muscat is desp for the job and not seeking the same financial assurances. I was told yesterday morning by a mate that it is 50/ 50 and it could take a bit longer than expected for ink to be put to paper on contract.

16.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 17:41:37
In all honesty Scotty123,its one of the few occasions that i don't have a preference to who becomes our new manager from kevin muscat and philipe clement, it's completely 50/ 50 for me, straight down the middle ?Both for me would be really good appointments for us ??? If pushed though to say who i think will get the job, i think it will be kevin muscat?Just got a feeling it will be him ?.

17.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 18:37:59
Walter and how does that make it true.

18.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 18:48:11
Salary is obviously part of the conversations and would have to be agreed upon in some respect with any candidates in order for discussions to progress. You’d hardly lead two candidates into the final stages without seeing if you’re on the same page financially.

19.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 19:18:06
I would imagine both managers provided there terms and Rangers said ok I will let you know.

20.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 19:20:02
John227, who's saying it makes it true ?We all have our say and opinions in what we hear and read etc so let's wait and see what eventually happens and time will tell ?.

21.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 19:20:19
I'd like to see a manager appointed during this international break.

22.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 19:26:37
Probably what they mean is they have spoken about Salary, bonuses etc and both are happy with what's on offer.
Although anything written in the press saying its dark outside I'd go and check to see!

23.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 20:14:27
Walter u r. U say we have agreed contracts with two people.

24.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 20:20:13
ANY salary or package MUST be based on performance and success surely?
As for who it is, carry on the debate lads, I won't hold my breath.

25.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 20:43:16
Clement is the man for the job .

26.) 14 Oct 2023
14 oct 2023 20:57:48
thats exactly it nrd.

27.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 21:29:14
As I see it if the Board is looking at solely on Footballing terms and are ambitious then it has to be Clement, especially since they have met face to face with him while Muscat hasn't by all accounts bothered to travel to the UK for a F2F Meeting.
If they lack ambition are either unwilling or unable to meet the requirements of Clement, if they put the commercial potential of the Asian Market ahead of football then we will end up with Muscat.
More worrying, we will probably end up with Moore as our DoF.

28.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 21:32:14
John How about live and let live? SWS is entitled to his thoughts and opinions.

29.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 22:08:41
I'm going dof Paul Mitchell manager philippe clement.

30.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 22:30:08
How the hang can you agree with 2 people to offer them the job, when. the successful person leaves what kind of integrity does that give out to future candidates who would apply for the position.
Would trust more people on this site than the press .

31.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 22:33:45
Beale that combo gives us the best chance of success and 100% isn’t the cheapest option but it’s the best option. If we want to stay simply the best we have to appoint the best or be prepared to be overtaken by them.

32.) 14 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 22:33:59
We haven’t agreed anything with two people.

33.) 15 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 22:48:47
Posted my thoughts without reading the comments but after reading them I’m tending to agree with Laubear, both managers have laid out their positions and now it’s up to the board to decide.

34.) 15 Oct 2023
14 Oct 2023 23:35:45
It would make sense to see what terms people want before going through a process do I'd have no problem If that was the case. Unfortunately it's not were still not there with either.

35.) 15 Oct 2023
15 Oct 2023 00:31:03
Rangers will have asked how much a salary they are looking for, it will be sorted out with agent before a final decision is made, does not mean you are getting the job tho, cannot see why some cannot understand that this would be sorted out with the two of them before a final decision ??‍♂️??.

36.) 15 Oct 2023
15 Oct 2023 04:52:31
Coopersda because whilst you can agree initial terms with someone why would you as sirwalter said have agreed a contract with two candidates just to pull one off the table and say no thanks were going with someone else? That's not very professional, contracts should be left to the preferred candidate not multiple folks. Why can't you understand that?

37.) 15 Oct 2023
15 Oct 2023 13:09:48
Otters 100% agree however he is happy to shoot down others then takes huff when asked a question, same guy who alleges he knows my source ., apparently his wife went to school with her in south England

Ger 88, if u offer someone a contract, they withdraw it, dodgy ground.