12 Apr 2020 23:01:25
Here's something I don't understand lads. How can a club get punished for criticising a referee but the SPFL/ SFA have been accused of corruption and have done nothing?

1.) 13 Apr 2020
12 Apr 2020 23:48:17
C of Ibrox, the clue is in your post - "accused". There not guilty.

2.) 13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020 01:48:16
Maybe because there is no corruption.

3.) 13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020 08:30:05
The point is that if Gerrard accused a ref of incompetence then he would be fined and censured even with the TV proving him correct. We are accusing the governing body of corruption and nothing.

4.) 13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020 09:53:54
No corruption? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.

5.) 13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020 10:25:10
the seeker suit stuck, one track brain corruption, the three of you can't see in front of your noses or your impartiality.

6.) 13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020 10:58:54
Here’s something else I don’t understand lads, how can a club break registration rules for almost every player over an 11 year period because they refused to declare extra payments on their players salaries, get it keep 5 titles and 10 cups won over this period. That’s 15 tainted domestic honours which surely must be scrapped from the history books on the grounds of maintaining sporting integrity?

7.) 13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020 11:14:41
No corruption lol that's a belter!

8.) 13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020 11:35:13
Surely you can't have based your corruption claims on Dundee lying to Partick and ICT?

9.) 13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020 12:31:38
old buzzbomb must be on the old laptop 24 hours a day, i think with his info on the gers financial side and past history he must get the mhank troll of the year award.

10.) 13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020 13:22:15
No, Suit, it's based on the SPFL lying and bullying the smaller clubs into accepting the proposal with false claims it was the only way they would get this season's prize money.
There was another option - they could apply for interest free loans from the SPFL based on their current league positions. This wasn't put to the smaller clubs.
The real reason the proposal was being pushed through was to hand Celtic an unearned tainted title. 👍.

11.) 13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020 14:13:40
Buzz, i see the police are getting involved with this voting carry on, do you think big pete will be spoken to. also what's your take on adidas, can't pay there debt to man utd, are they your clubs new kit sponsor?

12.) 13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020 14:24:23
simple Buzz Bomb. the tax tribunal and the judge only allowed proceedings to advance on the directors payments only! the inland rev had to go to court to get a ruling to bring everything back in. rangers did nothing wrong. followed revenue rules. which is challengeable believe it or not. I do, cause I worked in that office.

13.) 13 Apr 2020
13 Apr 2020 18:39:12
That ruling only changed recently because it wasn’t that long ago they were chasing the players to pay the loans back, that is why Barry Ferguson went into bankruptcy.

Years after the players retired. It doesn’t take away from the fact that Rangers would not have been able to afford the players they signed. Klos had the biggest salary of any goalkeeper in Europe and he played in Scotland.

The fact was Sir David Murray refused to downsize when Celtic started spending big money for the first time when Martin O’Neill came. To say Rangers done nothing wrong is also plain wrong.

It took Rangers several years to start highlighting the extra payments in their annual accounts. If they were doing nothing wrong then why were they hiding the extra payments. The 15 tainted honours should be stripped.

14.) 14 Apr 2020
14 Apr 2020 08:15:32
Buzz bomb, don't you tell me rangers have tainted titles that should be stripped from us, there are clubs that won tittles under far worst condition than ours, fact. do you think they should also be stripped of titles, at least we can say we done it for money, eh.