02 Mar 2015 19:03:33
Just heard king will not get the blessing from spl of football commissioners

1.) 02 Mar 2015
02 Mar 2015 20:07:00
Dont know aboot fellow bears I would rather have mick ashley look what he has done at newcastle well run bedt free club we bears must remember king and p murray were on old board that was the start of all our troubles worried bear not feeeling good aboot this anyone agree

{Ed039's Note - You do realise that Newcastle are in debt to the tune of about £150m to MIKE ASHLEY alone ...... debt free club my a**e)

2.) 02 Mar 2015
02 Mar 2015 20:25:40
With all due respect gardner 1965, how do you know this to be true that king won't get the spfl commissioner's blessing as a fit and proper person to run rangers, can we all not be happy we're finally getting shot of these rats instead of people coming on with negative stories of commissioners not passing king fit & proper, when clearly nobody just now can know this to be the case, its total scaremongering amongst our own pessimistic fans who start negative stories

3.) 02 Mar 2015
02 Mar 2015 20:55:35
King would have notified the sfa of his intentions, and got the green light, but suspect the sfa will want others to make it easier for them to clarify that he is a fit and proper person to be on board as chairman.

4.) 02 Mar 2015
02 Mar 2015 21:09:02
Op the spfl don't have a fit and proper thing in there association,

5.) 02 Mar 2015
02 Mar 2015 21:17:08
Does it really matter if SPFL allow Dave King to be a member of the board? Surely Dave King would simply be replaced with a like minded fellow or someone acting on his behalf? I can't see his support diminishing so long as he believes that we are being run properly, transparently and run an investigation into how things have been running since liquidation.

{Ed039's Note - Dave King has said all along if he is not passed "fit & proper" then he will step aside and allow someone else (like minded) to do the job)

6.) 02 Mar 2015
02 Mar 2015 21:20:40
Gardner1965

You sure your not on the stir mate. bit of light at the end of the tunnel and you want to create that bit of doubt. What was your source?

7.) 02 Mar 2015
02 Mar 2015 21:53:22
Sfa. Alcohol by the sound of it eh lol lol.

8.) 03 Mar 2015
02 Mar 2015 22:47:31
He has good alibis for both failings. But you know what the sfa are like with Rangers. Literally do sfa for us.

9.) 03 Mar 2015
02 Mar 2015 22:54:45
if this indeed turns out to be true, then it is surefire evidence that 1) the SPFL want Rangers to fail miserably and 2) they also couldn't care less if Scottish football lives or dies

It has become clear this season that without a successful Rangers the Scottish game is heading for the graveyard. Attendances everywhere speak volumes.

10.) 03 Mar 2015
03 Mar 2015 00:08:10
I ask myself why I'm answering to such a nonsense post, but I have, don't get involved with someone like this chaps, he, s full of pxxh, a troll I think the word is, and sum have fell for it, get a grip,

11.) 03 Mar 2015
03 Mar 2015 17:15:59
The SFA is the least of his worries. What does he/they do if the Stock Exchange actually ban him from being on the board?

12.) 03 Mar 2015
03 Mar 2015 20:29:00
@wee bill. Just a thought. Where would Rangers be right now if it wasn't for Scottish football. I don't recall interest in Rangers from any other country.

{Ed039's Note - Funny that being a football team based in Scotland ....... I believe we have honestly found the nomination for the newly created "stoopidist post o' the day" sponsored by B.B.)

13.) 03 Mar 2015
03 Mar 2015 20:40:43
Fly fifer mr king said if he was not allowed on the board he would just put a family member in his place mate, as it was his family company that bought the shares, I think mr king will be okay, but like I say he has it covered eh.