Rangers Banter Archive August 16 2013
Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.
16 Aug 2013 21:36:48
Does the splintered opinions on this site not show how fan ownership is impractical, if not impossible. We are fans, who suffer the ups and downs of our, once great, club but the mechanics of running this great institution is way beyond most of us.
The perpetrator of the current situation was murray who, despite his '' I will only sell to safe hands'' shafted us for self preservation. He is the lowest form and deserves nothing but the hatred of any decent fan. What followed on is a shambles, but as much as I detest Green, he saved us from oblivion and in the situation we were in, we accepted at any cost. However, there is a limit and as I have posted many times it is only hard cash that will remove him and his cohorts. We need someone, well versed in the financial sector to co-ordinate things, and believe me there are several out there that just need swayed, so forget about protests and follow our team, and lobby these men for their financial backing to rid us of the parasites.
billyb
Believable0
Unbelievable0
Your last line says it all. looking for a handout from wealthy businessmen. Rangers are a loss making football club in the lower tiers of a poor league and are banned from Europe. Massive cuts are needed to get the club back on the straight and narrow. This should have started after liquidation but the obsession to stay a big club kicked in and huge wages were paid that should never have been. It did not need wealthy individuals it needed a leader to stand up and unite the fans. Look at the cash raised by the IPO and TWO seasons worth of ST sales. Wasted on wages. Does Ally need two assitants?Does Ally need a full time goalkeeper coach?A full time fitness coach? Overnight Hotel stays all over the country to beat part time opponents?The waste in this club is ridiculous. Remember if a fan led group had control there would be no need for the excessive wages and bonus paid to directors either.
Agree0
Disagree0
Best response to all the deluded teeth gnashing I've read on this page fpr ages well said mate
Agree0
Disagree0
The memories of past glory is the millstone round the neck of the club
I fear that until the acceptance of the fact that a loss making model,
unsustainable in long or short term - where income is dwarfed by expenditure, has to be ditched.
Fergus McCann was successful at Parkhead because he managed the fans expectations - as well as the cost base of the club
Talk of "rightful place at the top of Scottish football" is the one thing guaranteed to keep Rangers on the skids
Agree0
Disagree0
Ally at worst responsible for £7m playing/coaching costs.
green/imran have burned thru £20m to get hands on thier cut of £4 m each
who is most to blame, if ally cut playing costs to say £3 m, green and co would just take it
Agree0
Disagree0
17 Aug 2013 13:00:02
Very well said @1. "Obsession to stay a big club" is the nutshell that explains so much of the gullibility and delusion that have prevented reality from dictating proceedings at ibrox. Its also the hallmark of the "institution" that the deluded are struggling to keep alive. Deeply ironic to the point of tragedy.
Agree0
Disagree0
@5 the fans for loving their team!
Agree0
Disagree0
This is a response to the east-end boys, who have made comment.
Financial backing is the use of their abilities to manage the massive company that we are. This would obviously mean being more prudent with costs etc. Our fans are second to none and have shown complete loyalty to the club. [ the team on the park. ] Unfortunately in Green we are being ripped off and need to get rid of him and his cohorts. We are not seeking a handout, we need assistance to move forward and with the correct people in charge everyone will be better off.
Far from being a loss maker, our great club has the basis and history to be very successful to the benefit of us all.
billyb
Agree0
Disagree0
@ billyb/ 'Lobby these men for their financial backing'. That it exactly what you said. Nothing about the use of their abilities. can't you understand. Rangers in it's current form is a money pit. They are spending more than they earn. If you gave your wife £200 every week and she was spending £300 would you tell her to stop?
Agree0
Disagree0
To nameless 8. Financial backing is the correct use of your investments and in the case of Rangers shareholders would be to maximise their standing, with efficiencies being a critical part. Financial input would possibly form part of that but at the end of the day who are you to comment.
billyb
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 20:30:58
more shares today to easdale. have posted or replied to posts a number of times in last few days [with no success being shown] saying why does everbody assume this means a plus for green, I say again I believe he is heading for a bloodied nose.
Believable0
Unbelievable0
The speculation is that he is planning to sell some of his shares to Easdale, he is seemingly locked in (cant sell them) till December, do you think if Easdale votes against him that deal goes ahead?
Gaz
Agree0
Disagree0
@ gaz he maybe locked in but he can still put the deals for his shares in motion the now
Agree0
Disagree0
@2) I know, my point to OP was that one of those supposed deals was with Easdale. Which is the likelier, businessman you deal with votes your way or businessman you deal with votes against you? If our instinct has Easdale voting any way, it is surely WITH his business colleague no?
Gaz
Agree0
Disagree0
Green sold shares to them and was pictured at their bus depot last week for a meeting. I would think it would be a surprise if they turned against him.
Agree0
Disagree0
Eh, Easdale voted Green back in against Walter's wishes, hence resignation.
Agree0
Disagree0
By the end of this, Easdale will be the new SDM.
But he won't own the assets.
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 18:00:41
rangers to sign 1 more striker in Tommaso Rocchi he maybe 35 but he's a beast player and will coach young strikers in the mean time aswell as playing sometimes, you heard it here first
bdawg123
Believable0
Unbelievable0
Uhhm. Why do you need a 35 year old striker to coach the young strikers. Is the manager of the club, Ally McCoist, not a striker, I do recall he scored a few goals. what a daft post. Hiring a striking coach in what is the 3rd division.
Agree0
Disagree0
The same Tommaso Rocchi who signed a short term deal with inter last season on 30k a week?
Makes me laugh when people come out with this sh*te. As if the club are really in a position to be signing players right now, especially prima-donna italian one's with big wage demands. Staff being made redundant, wage bill already massive for the task at hand and talk of the club losing a million pounds a month.
Go and have a word with yourself mate.
Marbella Bear
Agree0
Disagree0
So if he plays with Daly the two front men will be 66 combined! Brilliant way to give youth a chance.
Agree0
Disagree0
We need to press the brakes - not the accelerator
Which part of the board sanctioned this spend
Cant believe the OP sounds excited about this!
Agree0
Disagree0
OP. The idea is so ridiculously stupid in our current circumstances that I can almost see Ally gong for it.
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 17:21:44
Go on Ally, give your endorsement to the support, all your other endorsements have been fantastic!
Green & Whyte; need I say anymore!
"Ally McCoist has said that he is not against the idea of some level of fan ownership at The Rangers. "
The wee fat cheeky chappy is a Celtic legend!!
Believable0
Unbelievable0
Just listened to mcCoist on tele re fan ownership. I don't have a 100% view on
it, but if it happens i'm all for it, explain that one ally. jimbo
Agree0
Disagree0
Fans own 7% already. so that's no issue, or does he means fans need to buyout green?
Agree0
Disagree0
Simple explanation. Keep yourself on side with everybody just like he always does. I hope the Ally defenders heard it.
Agree0
Disagree0
Op that's the first time anybody has called neil lennon the wee fat cheeky chappy lol
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 16:04:15
McColl, Green, Murray, Mather, Stockbridge etc etc are all a massive distraction from the REAL problem at Rangers, Ally "Millions" McCoist, he is not only robbing us blind he is rubbing our noses in it with his "one of the fans" BS, anyone taking that sort of money while the club makes backroom staff redundant is in it for himself and is not worthy to be Rangers manager, even at 10% of his current earnings he would be over paid based on his ability, and we know he will sign anyone at any cost to the club to keep his job. I can't understand why the club want him but why some supporters back him completely baffles me, he is a liability we can ill afford and that's without mentioning his schoolboy tactics and farcical formations.
Believable0
Unbelievable0
100% correct and also a 3rd rate manager at best but some fans love all this we don't do walking away pi#h
But ally if your listening please walk away now your clueless as a manager FACT
KJA
Agree0
Disagree0
And you know what he
earns how?
billy h
Agree0
Disagree0
Don't tell me, it was allys fault we got liquidated? Another one of them who reckon if we get rid of mccoist we'll get someone better and cheaper.
Agree0
Disagree0
@op how is mccoist the problem he's had reportedly between 1-1.5m so please explain why he's the main problem when we've spent between 25-35 mil it's the same p*sh everybody goes on about what about the stadium apparently for sale and lease it back for a couple of mill a year which is the only guaranteed money will be season ticket money from the blue tinted glasses brigade so you just continue on about the side show (ally)while Charlie and co clear is out
Agree0
Disagree0
According to Glenn Gibbons he is on £760,000.
Gaz
Agree0
Disagree0
If you think Ally is a bigger problem than the money grabbing vultures that are Green, Ahmad and Stockbridge.
Yes Ally has got knocked out of some cups, yet these people are quickly stripping all that is Rangers. Frankly it is personic people like you who are more concerned with a couple of defeats than the demise of our club - that is the distraction.
Agree0
Disagree0
Do you also know that when those players that have since buggered off were hailed as heroes because they took a reduction in wages that Ally took no wages at all. Easy to snipe if you don't know the facts.
Agree0
Disagree0
@2/ A simple extrapolation of the figures released in the last public accounts. Unaudited of course.
Agree0
Disagree0
Billy h.
The fact will be made very clear when accounts published.
Rfc a public company now.
Agree0
Disagree0
@9 exactly but until accounts
are made public then no one
can say for certain how much
ally, coaching staff and players
are being paid
billy h.
Agree0
Disagree0
TO No 6 do you mean 'some' as in 'all'?
Agree0
Disagree0
11) Alex Ferguson with Jose Mourinho as his number 2 would not win a cup in the circumstances that Ally faced last season. We had 6 players a week before the season kicked off.
Agree0
Disagree0
Billy h ally paid 700k for his shares, thus buying into club and paying his own wages.
wake up, spin to blame ally and deflect from £0m heist
Agree0
Disagree0
@2 interim accounts
Agree0
Disagree0
@ 13 still no proof, we
have had on here he's on wages
ranging from 6. 5k to 1mil so apart
from what you read in the papers
. unless you work in wages dept or
you are Allys bank manager how can
you possibly know how much he's on
billy h
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 12:49:08
I'm sure that those posters who suggest that McColl doesn't want to risk too much of his money on a stake in Rangers.
However, he does seem to be prepared to put his name forward to lend credibility to any group who wants to overturn the Green board.
The best thing we as fans can do now is to stay united in opposition to Green and his acolytes and Quislings.
Believable0
Unbelievable0
My apologies.
The first sentence of my post should finish with, "are correct".
Agree0
Disagree0
McColl isn't doing nearly enough. He'd sit back and criticise and allow it to go bust again before putting in money.
Agree0
Disagree0
@2 if green. and imrans plan is take £8+mill out each year, will not leave war chest to improve team and rebuild.
Agree0
Disagree0
Why should Mr McCall do anything when the fans as a collective group continue to sit on their hands and do nothing.
We should not go back in to Ibrox but remain outside for every home game until every member of the board has been removed. One person doing this is meaningless but 40,000 fans will send a very strong message which cannot be ignored
Agree0
Disagree0
@4 40000 fans buying shares would send a stronger message
Jg
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 20:55:33
would be fantastic if that hapened number 4 but let's face it won't and we'd be lucky if a few 1000 did so.
Agree0
Disagree0
3)
I don't think you have grasped the scale of the problem - If IA and CG take any more money out, then Rangers will be playing in the pub leagues next year.
On the positive side - it will still be in front of 30,000 at Ibrox
Agree0
Disagree0
Jg fans paying green even more money for worthless share does not solve problem, you don't feed letches more blood you burn them off
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 12:04:25
Why doesn't everyone get to the next home league game (East Fife?) and take their seats an hour early. Pack the place out, make a huge noise, no demo banners just Rangers songs (nothing controversial!), flags and scarves then when the whistle blows and the spivs take their seats get up and walk out (slowly and safely) in complete silence.
Imagine the publicity for that and the message it would convey.
Fan power!
Foxy
Believable0
Unbelievable0
That would certainly send a message. I would think that no one paying at the gate would send a bigger one though.
Agree0
Disagree0
It will never happen. We as fans had the chance to raise money. We failed that. We ha the chance to oust tnhe spivs we lost that we should all be ashamed of ourselves.
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 16:45:16
wait until the next live TV game at home, protest outside and do not enter the stadium. go to the pub and watch the game
how would that look, even SPFL would want answers as they would be embarrassed
Agree0
Disagree0
Yes, indeed 300 people will see it on BBC Alba. TTTS
Agree0
Disagree0
30 odd thousand season tickets already paid for so not turning up wouldn't really hurt. Turning up, showing support for your team and cheering out the players, then demonstrating disgust by leaving when the spivs arrive would be a much stronger message.
Needs to be all-in though and done peacefully. Silence would be the key. Imagine leaving the spivs and a few hundred stunned East Fife fans in the far corner.
Foxy
Agree0
Disagree0
After game, sit in and stay for hours and hours, that's a protest, as how do you evacuate 35,000 solid fans
Agree0
Disagree0
@5 but they will be thinking about next years money or how to get more money out of us. I think this would send a very loud message and has got to be done when the cameras are there. I think fans should start buying shares in the new year when there cheap when price goes up stop buying.
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 12:01:55
I'm not talking about the whole "Scotland's most successful club" debate here. I'm talking about being a big club.
Are you a big club if your revenue is X and your expenditure is X plus upwards of £15m?
Last season your income was seemingly £12m ST, Green claims he raised £34m (no one has challenged that figure once this week). And whatever other cash was generated from game day incomes, tv, SPL, sponsors, merchandise etc. Conservatively how many more millions for that £5m-£10m?
So in total last season the clubs revenue was over £50m. Including this season's revenue so far, as of August 8th Stockbridge says the club has £10m. meaning that come the end of the financial year (June 30th) Rangers possibly had £5-£6m left over from last season. It doesn't take a genius to work out therefore that they spent approximately £45m last season. There were a number of one off payments but I'd say as a bare minimum it takes £30-£35m to run Rangers based on last season (bear in mind if Sandaza's wages were incremental £4k, then £6k, then £8k etc then most likely so are Templeton's, Black's etc).
Revenue for this year doesn't include Green's consortium's investment nor the IPO. Right away you have a hole of £34m. Sure you may get a very slightly bigger amount from the SPFL but we are talking washers, same applies for sponsors presumably but it still leaves a gap of £15m-£20m above and beyond all revenue streams.
That is not a big club, which begs one question, why are you, to this day, acting like one?
Gaz
Believable0
Unbelievable0
16 Aug 2013 11:36:34
Did Walter know there was only ten million? Is it less?
Did Walter know it was going to be a capital structuring? Sale and leaseback? Did Walter warn fans? He said weeks ago the job needed someone with skills to bring in needed new investment. That was a big hint.
Is Ally and Jabba just happy to be taking the big money?
Believable0
Unbelievable0
16 Aug 2013 10:49:08
Baby Hateley coming to Ibrox. What a joke. All Old Pals acts. What a farce of a club. I wonder if Ally can get in contact with Terry Hurlock, he might have a son who needs a job. Probably be good at kicking people too.
Believable0
Unbelievable0
Is this Mark's reward for his loss of his PR wages?
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 13:53:09
Ally's like this wife I saw last year on the telly, the bailiffs were threatening to repossess her house, she owed serious dosh to all her pals and family, debt up to her eyeballs but she still couldn't resist buying a new pair of new shoes. Beyond a joke.
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 11:43:33
Not a rumour more of a question to those that know everything :P What has happened to the Ibrox renaming rights?
Believable0
Unbelievable0
They settled on "For Sale"
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 13:47:12
Maybe whoever actually owns the stadium isn't allowing it to be renamed.
Agree0
Disagree0
We're not going to own Ibrox soon, the new owners can call it whatever they like, and we can choose to rent it or not.
Agree0
Disagree0
It was pre emptive to suggest say a three year naming deal, when new owners wouldn't want existing naming contracts. Best to sell the whole lot, leaseback and let new owners sell names.
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 11:38:44
I am going to have a go at all the bears who are now complaining about buying a season ticket and put my point of view across
You bought a season ticket to support the club and to go and watch the rangers at ibrox for 18 league 1 games at a discounted rate than 18 individual tickets would have cost
You can now use your st to go and watch 18 league 1 games (with a much improved team on the park), that's exactly what you bought, it does exactly what it says on the tin, why are you complaining
Are you saying your 250 quid has been stolen?
Ok we all know that money is not being spent correctly by management and some main shareholders are unhappy but if you had bought 18 individual tickets then that is more money you would have handed over, unless you tell me the directors and all can steal st money but not ticket money
ok got that off my chest, look forward to the usual nashing of teeth and wailing responses
JG
Believable0
Unbelievable0
For once I actually agree with you JG.
Myself and others warned that as soon as the season ticket money was in then the spivs could do whatever they liked only to be told, for example that that wouldn't happen with Walter there.
Holding back ST money was the best chance of the fans being able to have at least some influence over the spivs but 99% + of them blew it.
Sorry guys but everyone who renewed STs has to bear some blame for the current situation.
Agree0
Disagree0
With individual tickets we could have voted with our feet with regards to how the club is run. By paying up front for discount and then finding out all this crap afterwards means we have been taken for a ride.
Agree0
Disagree0
JG - are you a silly man? The difference is the money was paid up front. In one go. Gone. Big difference between buying an ST and a Match-Day ticket. Fans were Gubbed my Smith and McCoist into a rosy view of all things Rangers. Season tickets sold - Smith "walks". Green banks. There won't be 18 games this year at Ibrox. Busted way before 18 games.
Agree0
Disagree0
Not posted in a while as quite frankly I'm scunnered with the endless merry-go-round of futile debate. However, I do feel this is a different enough post to comment on, and one which I agree with in part. I will therefore reply with no gnashing or wailing.
You are spot on regarding what you are paying for J. G. You pay for these games and you get access to these games (assuming admin 2 doesn't hit by Christmas, although honestly I think this is unlikely).
Anyway, I digress, the point is I agree with that part of your assesment and I too feel there is yet again no point in simply moaning on here.
However, as you'll know I have had my fair share of indecision on here with my heart ruling my head at times and a few changes of opinion. That is my right as these are my opinions and this is my cash.
My problem when I renewed was the subsequent return of Green and departure of Smith. With chaos resuming before our eyes I felt like a fool for believing again that things would be ok and we could just go to watch the football. To me my season ticket was less about getting to watch 18 games and more about me endorsing the regime in charge. That didn't sit comfortably with me as no matter what I think of the football or the team I do not want to be part of this psudo Rangers that we have with these men at the helm. It is for this reason alone that I decided not to moan, whine or gnash teeth. I chose to take a personal stance. I called Rangers prior to the season opener and advised them I wanted to cancel my season ticket, citing the reasons given above. I was told I had to put it in an email so this is what I did. I heard nothing back and the season began. I didn't go to the Brechin game but I watched it on telly, happy to see the boys play quite well. I then made follow up calls/emails to the club reminding them that I had not used my smartcard and that I wanted an answer to my cancellation request. Eventually I got the answer to my request in the form of my money refunded to my card (minus £30 which I assume is some sort of admin fee). I don't know if this happened due to Rangers themselves making the decision or if it is because I instructed my credit card company to recall payments and not to authorise any further payments but either way I am comfortable with my position. Otherwise there has been no contact from the club to find out why but in talking to staff at the ticket office it was clear I had not been the only one making this request as they were "waiting on the powers that be making a decision on these REQUESTS"
Essentially what I am saying is this, each to their own. God knows I've changed my opinion loads of times and I'm not about to tell people what they should do with their cash. If you can be comfortable with getting what you paid for that's great. I kind of wish that I could just focus on the football but unfortunately I can't; and there lies the real issue. We are divided as a support and it's because of this that these men in the hotseat are laughing all the way to the bank. There are none of us who should have to be making these decisions, moral or otherwise but there you have it. If I am the only one who has decided to do this then so be it. I certainly feel more comfortable now that I've cancelled than I did when I renewed and that says it all for me.
Agree0
Disagree0
Baybear, You have just explained exactly how I feel. Difference is I have not asked to cancel my season ticket yet. Unlike you, my heart continues to rule my head agaisnt my better judgement but don't know for how much longer. What I do know is that only the fans can halt this by direct action so I will continue to go in the hope that 40,000 fans do not go into the ground on a Saturday until the full board are removed
Agree0
Disagree0
I'm quite sure that took a lot of soul searching Baybear but your final sentence gives you your own answer. Whatever happens from here you took a principled stand and I applaud you for it.
Gaz
Agree0
Disagree0
@ baybear well done mate it wouldn't surprise me it being rangers taking the £30 also mate a really don't know why a lot of fans happily gave there money to these men it's nothing to do with Walter or ally with people renewing because am sure 22k did by the deadline it's the other 12k of fans like yourself who thought that we wer sorting everything out then the Yorkshire snake gets voted back after a requisition was served to get rid of his men and I don't get how most fans are continuing to let them keep the fans divided
Agree0
Disagree0
@5, 6, 7 Just felt the right thing to do. I won't pretend It wasn't gutting but I'm glad I took this personal stance, regardless of how insignificant it may be in the grand scheme of things. Got to be honest, expected to take pelters for this decision. Maybe there's hope for us as a unified support yet?
Agree0
Disagree0
You'll be able to glance in the mirror and look yourself in the eye Baybear. When RP McMurphy (Jack Nicholson) fails to lift the big sink in One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest he goes back to the rest of them and says "At least I tried, god dammit. "
All you need is a six foot ten native American and your quids in mate :)
Gaz
Agree0
Disagree0
@ baybear I really hope we can unite it really is the only way we only need one person to stand and I'm sure it will go from that one person to all the fans standing together pushing in the right direction
Agree0
Disagree0
@9 a very apt comparison Gaz. This saga has felt like One Flew Over The Cuckoos nest at times. At least I've managed to just about keep my sanity.
. "come on Tonto, we're off. Those jam sandwiches won't wash themselves will they!"
Agree0
Disagree0
16 Aug 2013 10:11:33
i heard this aswell last night hateley would be a good free transfer
Believable0
Unbelievable0
I agree and also most of the players that have been brought in will have a sell on value more than their wages.
I cannot understand all the so called fans on here must be celtic fans certainly not true Rangers Fans
Agree0
Disagree0