Rangers Rumours Member Posts

 

Spark74's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition:

Not entered
Correct Score Competition
Flat Out Racing:

Not played Flat Out Racing


No Profile Picture uploaded

Team:


Where from:


Favourite player:


Best team moment:


Interests:


Timezone:




Spark74's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To Spark74's Posts

 

 

To Spark74's last 5 rumours posts

 

To Spark74's last 5 rumour replies

 

To Spark74's last 5 banter replies

 

Spark74's rumours posts with other poster's replies to Spark74's rumours posts

 

05 Dec 2015 18:49:01
Allegations that the board rigged the voting at the agm, possible all directors could be banned from being directors for 5 years. Is this all part of the grand plan bigwull?

Spark74

1.) 05 Dec 2015 19:43:49
Total man wee.


2.) 05 Dec 2015 20:24:15
Lol, if they rigged the vote then why did they not get the 75% they needed to achieve their aims? I know you aren't a fan of the current board but even you have to admit they can't be that inept surely, risking rigging a vote then still losing it? Btw, allegations Ashley has links to Whyte, Green etc and been behind the systematic asset stripping of Rangers from the start. Unsubstantiated but still far more believable than op allegation. :-)


3.) 06 Dec 2015 09:21:09
Spark74
Was it so good you posted it twice?


4.) 07 Dec 2015 10:24:52
So let me get this right we rigged a agm and we didn't win all the votes to get what we wanted . hhhnmnn so what did we rig?


5.) 08 Dec 2015 14:20:25
Em, sorry but there is at least a little of truth to this. Boards attempt was to remove voting rights of shareholders who appose them, which is wrong (no matter what opinions are of Ashley/easdale) an attempt to ensure boards plans can't get blocked.

Whilst I can understand the demands to know who owns easdales proxy vote shares there is no legal right to block votes and this will come back to bite.


 

 

 

Spark74 has no Banter Posts

 

 

Spark74's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

04 Aug 2017 21:36:41
Don't think he can sign a pre contract till a month before his contract ends. Also believe hearts are due a development fee somewhere in the region of 350k-400k as his contract expires before he's 24

Spark74

 

 

Click To View This Thread

08 Jul 2017 17:46:12
Are all those teams confirmed in this new system, does it have a name

Spark74

 

 

Click To View This Thread

08 Jul 2017 12:48:46
Which teams specifically are involved in this?

Spark74

 

 

Click To View This Thread

07 Jul 2017 21:27:34
Which system is that?

Spark74

 

 

Click To View This Thread

28 Nov 2016 16:52:32
The pain is really oozing out of some you lot. If Celtic win 10 in a row it will be deserved, the only tainted titles you lot should be worrying about are the Ones your old club won during the Ebt years. When the Supreme Court rules against the appeal they will be stripped And rightly so.

Spark74

 

 

 

Spark74's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

27 May 2017 17:49:20
No luck, good luck with your problems going bust an all that

Spark74

 

 

Click To View This Thread

30 Nov 2016 17:23:38
It might be a bit difficult to prove you have a plan to reduce your losses particularly when king told shareholders at the agm they would have to spend more than they make for some considerable time which would indicate the losses will increase, you can never really tell if anything that man says is true or a lie. Suppose that's tobacco be expected when you have a convicted criminal at the helm.

Spark74

 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Sep 2016 17:10:13
They beat deportiva 8-0 last season.

Spark74

 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Sep 2016 12:58:58
£30 million seems like a decent point to me.

Spark74

 

 

Click To View This Thread

09 Jul 2016 11:34:41
I've read online 5 players are currently available and their agents have been told to look for clubs to sell them to. The players I've read are those 2 fotheringham, kiernan and another which wasn't named.

Spark74