Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded
No Avatar image uploaded
Rangers Rumours Member Posts
William1989's Profile
William1989's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To William1989's Posts
To William1989's last 5 rumours posts
To William1989's last 5 banter posts
To William1989's last 5 rumour replies
William1989's rumours posts with other poster's replies to William1989's rumours posts
06 Aug 2015 23:25:36
Scott Allan rejects Rotherham enquiry as
he wants to remain in Scotland. Meaning
wanting to either stay at hibs or eventually
join us at some stage.
1.) 07 Aug 2015 07:26:50
Scott Allan has not ruled out joining another team in Scotland.
Looks like he may not wait for us after all.
2.) 07 Aug 2015 12:43:04
If he can't wait to join Rangers then they should forget about him. Certainly not worth a million in his final year look at what Celtic paid to DU for their 2 best players in their final year of their contracts.
3.) 07 Aug 2015 12:57:34
Mvg, why you always negative about about Scott allan, first you moaned about the transfer request only for him to put one in that very day, then you told us he wasn't coming to rangers ever, you couldn't see him turning down Rotherham only for him to reject them. He wants to come to rangers hence the transfer request, he never put a transfer request in when Dundee utd got there bid rejected. He will be here this summer or next.
4.) 07 Aug 2015 17:30:52
Freddie. Not being negative on purpose regarding Scott Allan. Just don't think we will get him.
5.) 07 Aug 2015 17:59:26
Mackay Stevens and Armstrong were signed in January for over 2 million and cifti cost 1.5 how does that even compare to Scott Alan?
6.) 07 Aug 2015 20:19:57
only other team that will pay him same money as us would celtic if he is as big a rangers supporter as he claims that would be a no no
7.) 08 Aug 2015 08:26:48
Spark74
Armstrong wasn't into the final year of his contract so there is no parallel there, but Mackay Steven would have signed a pre contract with Celtic if they and DU hadn't agreed on a deal to take him in January for £250,000. Obviously DU knew he was going and didn't want him to walk away for nothing. Allan will be in exactly the same position in January, except Hibs may decide to cut their noses off and hang on to an unhappy player who will not want his club to gain automatic promotion at the expense of the club he wants to sign for. Makes a lot of sense, doesn't it?
8.) 08 Aug 2015 11:31:55
I think McKay Steven had already signed before a fee was agreed and had only 5 months left on his contract also cifti is the same age as Scott Alan and had a year left and cost 1.5m. I don't see any comparison to the Scott Allan situation which jfr has tried to put into the mix. Hibs have duty to there fans to try and gain promotion and a blind man can see that selling him to Rangers would show a complete lack of ambition and if they fail would probably cost them a hell of a lot more than they stand to gain with the current offers being tabled. They would be better off with him sitting in the reserves than selling him to there biggest rivals. I think the boy has been badly advised handing in a transfer request. He faces the prospect of being completely frozen out now as I really don't think there is any chance he will be joining Rangers this year. He should have done the right thing by hibs, the club that kickstarted his career instead of acting like a petulant little kid
William1989's banter posts with other poster's replies to William1989's banter posts
20 Jun 2014 10:10:31
Just seen on sky transfer new David goodwill has mutually terminated his contract at Blackburn. Did ally not take Boyd for this reason, knowing it would happen?
1.) Kilmarnock rumoured to want to sign Goodwillie.
2.) Goodwillie should not be considered due to his past history in my opinion what does everyone think
3.) Wull61 totally agree mate we slag east ender for alleged flasher ffs what would people say about us apart from that I've got daughyers that enjoy night life in glasgow
With the bears having the largest share in the club, would they have first options of buying new shares in the new issue shortly?
Also sandy easdale will veto his vote on the board as he is no longer representing that proportion of the shareholders?
David somers out the door!
William1989 has no Banter Replies