Rangers Finances 3

 

Use our rumours form to send us rangers transfer rumours.


(single word yields best result)
 

Our World Cup 2018 page.

01 Jun 2018 16:36:48
Just wondering if anyone can provide some info regarding kit deal.
The reported deal from Hummel is £10 million over 3 years. that's a given.
Question is, just say we sell 100,000 strips a year at £50 a top, more if you buy the full kit, do we make money over and above the deal money?
Thanks in advance.

Agree1 Disagree3

02 Jun 2018 00:49:54
Hi No Hummel, get all the extra money, they give you the money upfront, and then they reap what they have down, is fair enough, they take a gamble on giving you ten million over three years, and then they win or lose on how much jerseys are sold, but you had to sign on the dotted line because, as they say, you need the readies.

02 Jun 2018 09:54:25
Aindoh did not know u had read the contract. U talk some sh

02 Jun 2018 14:14:56
He does talk single fish, I believe we get the ten million as sponsorship then there is a split of the profits

02 Jun 2018 15:13:52
That's what I thought Kenny. Just wasn't sure. We could make millions this summer as I'm sure the tops will fly off the shelf.
Btw glad the mhanks are still taking an interest in all things Rangers😋

02 Jun 2018 21:31:56
Colster mate have you heard any release date for the strips

03 Jun 2018 09:11:28
Nothing yet although I saw on another forum that the kit is rumoured to go on sale 1st August with JD Sports the distributor. They will then eventually move into the measure at Ibrox. i'm assuming if this is true re launch date we still must be tied in contractually to Puma till that date as we would be missing out on millions up to that date.

03 Jun 2018 16:25:40
SR confirmed at narsa that sports direct contract runs out 31st July. More info to come on the strips over the next few months but will not be available for purchase prior to then. We will play in the new kits in qualifiers though.

09 Jun 2018 12:29:11
The tatties previous are speaking pure drivel again Can't handle that we are starting to take shape

Hummel is a 3 year deal at 10m with 50/ 50 on shirt sales which is fair enough I think both Rangers and Hummel have done good Business We will sell shirts in their hundreds of thousands if we know that these shirts are going into the coffers as they should Unlike that robbing chunt Mike Ashley

If he had played his cards right and he had bought the club and sold up Newcastle he could've been onto better things getting his brand across globally but he got too greedy!

09 Jun 2018 19:03:44
Just hope they are decent looking strips and the club benefit from the sales and things start to fall back into place with finances. I'm sure our fans will buy out all strips every year and I have a feeling Gerrard will be on the back of at least 5000+ tops.

17 Jun 2018 13:18:55
50/ 50 split in shirt sales. They will sell by the tens of thousands. Good business by King and co

31 May 2018 06:14:21
Hey guys I was just thinking while Dave king is investigating the sfa and SPFL shanaigins I would have another look into the ebt, s that were use at porkheid we were told some stupid excuse at the time but an ebt is an ebt is it not it's there for you mr. king go and get it 👍.

Agree3 Disagree5

31 May 2018 08:40:10
You mean the ebt that was used for Juninho but then Celtic cancelled it and repaid any outstanding monies owed? That EBT?

31 May 2018 09:05:32
A think you mean you concealed it my friend the games up no one to ask the questions they all could do what they wanted with us because no one wanted to fight our corner Mr. king had other crap to fight when he took over a think he’s now going after the place men now and the wrong doings there’s a few jackets on shaky nails and I think the pack of cards comment just about sums it up 👀

31 May 2018 10:07:49
Yeah good luck with that. I think you'll find Celtic are run properly. Not by the dodgiest of tax dodging liars. If you guys spent as much effort questioning your own shyster owners, you might be in a better position

31 May 2018 11:17:08
Run properly that’s what you want the world to believe but your times up my friend your little organization in Scotland is coming to an end soon the world of football will see what you’s are really like wink wink say no more 😜

31 May 2018 22:35:53
Thetinman, a question was Campbell Ogilvie, a director at Rangers and a high head yin at the SFA, in those positions when Rangers were doing the EBTs?, and was the man described, by a South African judge, as a glib and shameless liar, at Rangers when they were doing the EBTs?

01 Jun 2018 05:59:45
Yes he was but he was not a share holder in David Murray’s business company in turn would mean he had a conflict of interest look it’s there for all to see what’s going on here it’s standing out like a sore thumb liewell has got placemen in there while we were down if you dig (and not very deep) you can see were the guys in power at the sfa and SPFL lead back to but eventually when the press in Scotland take their head oot liewells rectum the massive story is there for them and if mr. king is so bad why did they say he was fit and proper to run the famous Glasgow Rangers tell me that! Eventually it will come out watch this space👀

01 Jun 2018 13:14:37
It's terrible all these Celtic men running the game and making Dave king employ Warburton and Pedro and making rangers buy Pena and Russell Martin on loan and making Dave hold on to buffalo bill instead of getting the 11 million. Do you see where I'm going with this tinman.

01 Jun 2018 18:53:59
No where are you going with this

02 Jun 2018 07:52:33
The tinman I'm on your side but D King wasn't granted fit and proper status by the SFA. Remember the court case when Ashley took the SFA to court over why they granted D King F and P status. Cases clasped one day one when SFA lawyers handed Ashley's lawyers a piece of paper saying along the lines NO Case to answer. The SFA have never granted him that as he doesn't need it as he's only the largest shareholder in the holding company.

02 Jun 2018 08:18:00
Even better he doesn’t need it

02 Jun 2018 09:30:52
I, for one, am all for EVERYTHING coming out. Let's see ALL the dirt that has been swept under the carpet.
NEVER going to happen because those involved will end up with the long arm of the law feeling their collar.

03 Jun 2018 07:58:06
Password do you mean all their dirt or ours? Or All from both because the FBI and the CIA couldn't cope with that much dirt wink wink

03 Jun 2018 09:44:17
And what dirt do we have enlighten me Isle of mull?

08 Jun 2018 04:55:04
Did you follow the Craig Whyte trial?

09 Jun 2018 19:06:48
It's all a load of single fish, who cares it goes on in business all the time. Football is no different. 11 v 11 on the park end of story.

23 May 2018 20:22:59
Rangers have a good case against the SFA they should win because remember mr green bought rangers old co assets rangers old co is currently in liquidation which means sevo5088 actually own the club now so the SFA are chasing a club defunct so logically that means sevco5088 cannot be reasonable for rangers old co debts or fines it's a no brainer it's a new company that changed it's i'd SO we can walk away from all fines and carry on our merry way remember it suits Celtic to call rangers a new club but when rangers owe money they want us to pay? That's ludicrous!

Agree1 Disagree18

23 May 2018 20:45:28
And. breathe!

Just a bit of punctuation would help.

24 May 2018 10:09:35
To be fair, Baldy, those who have been in charge of the club from Green to the present have happily played on that grey area too. The good parts of the history are ours, but the bad parts lie with oldco.

24 May 2018 10:16:40
So Baldy70 you are claiming that the SFA are chasing a defunct club - I thought you were the same club but different company?
I also though it was common knowledge that in order to gain entry into the league system the NEWCO had to honour all football related debts.?
But hey, a leopard never changes its spots - so why not just walk away from the debts!

24 May 2018 14:56:14
Baldy, if you check, you'll find that it is actually against SFA/ UEFA rules for a club to take their parent FA to court and doing it gets you banned by them.

29 May 2018 16:45:05
A certain Mr Bosman took on the whole of European Football in the courts and won. Also in 2005 Livingston saw the SFA in court. Sorry to say you're wrong. At the back of my mind did Lennon not also challenge a touchline ban in the courts?

22 May 2018 23:05:59
Great to hear all the names and transfer fees that are being banded about, however I feel I must refer back to a previous post I have made concerning investment in our great longstanding club, many who said I have no idea what I'm talking about are right in the heart of many rumours, I ask you directly, if there is no investment ( which I believe is still coming) how shall we pay for all these fees and wages if ( as I believe and reported) there is no investment?

Agree2 Disagree5

23 May 2018 06:03:42
Loyalist, unless you are on the board there is no need for you to worry about such things.
DK has said money will be available to support SG. end of!

23 May 2018 09:19:19
The same D King who is still trying to get a British Bank account. Oh that D King

23 May 2018 10:19:35
ION, that would be the same D King who has risked a hell of a lot of his own cash on buying shares and keeping us afloat!

Yes, that DK

BTW, he has demonstrated that he is a rangers fan. can’t say the same about you

23 May 2018 10:27:47
IOM. You wouldn't believe the difficulty of trying to put millions in a British bank account. It must be almost impossible if Honest Dave is having problems trying to do so.

23 May 2018 12:05:00
DK17 let's have a competition
You name one of stories that are true and I will name one of his lies
I will start Nomad in 48 hours
Your turn

23 May 2018 14:14:29
Iom try once to be positive, tims love how you run our great club down. We support our club through good and bad try it

23 May 2018 15:14:55
Sorry IOM, I’m not really into playground games.

For me DK is delivering on his 5 year plan. you choose to pick out the negatives only.

Do I think DK is perfect? Nope, but until a white knight starts knocking on our door with a bigger cheque and bigger balls then I choose to put my support behind him.

Each to their own

23 May 2018 16:46:37
Isle of Mull, what username (s) have you previously used?

23 May 2018 18:26:47
I'm one of the enermy on here because I don't believe every word D King says. I'm only highlight the negatives yes in D King. Its said I am only negative so Tim's can get a laugh, rubbish. Think back to when he came in Nomad, share issue, family fortune of £30-50m that was day one. As long as this man is at my club (yes my club) I will keep looking into his statements. Yes I agree with 99% of bears about SG wonderful business let's hope D K gives him the tools to get the job done and he's not been sold pup by the SA businessman. Cuillen 72 can I you the same question and what does it matter, will you look over my old post to see the % of positive post against negative ones.

23 May 2018 18:28:23
DK17 agree totally with you

23 May 2018 20:11:47
Well jboy 17 I'm shocked and stunned your backing DK17 against me. Oh by the way you have 50,000 shares have you heard anything from mr King.

24 May 2018 09:39:36
Not backing anyone, say what I think.
Nothing heard re shares, not selling anyway

24 May 2018 18:20:33
Thanks for your honest answer jboy
Hope you can see my point about your shares cause if D King has not got a British Bank account to finance share buy up verdict of the TOP. How will he get money into the country to finance SG attemp at 55.

24 May 2018 20:41:43
IOM

You seem to have concluded that DK is personally responsible for financing Rangers. He is not the owner and has 14% of the club so has 14% of the control. I do accept that the DK and 3 bears concert party do control the direction of the club but they are still restricted in what they can do. Surely you can see that the man has put at least 12-15m in to Rangers this time round with all of it at risk if he fails to get a massive share issue through at some point. He has no secured loan arrangement and if you think of the £20m he lost before and the man is getting a hard time.

Most of us are season tickets who are prepared to risk £500 and some meaningless throw away opinion. He has much more at stake than we do. DK is taking the personal risk (whether personal or trust money) and he deserves the reward or loss and at least some recognition

24 May 2018 22:25:00
50000 shares if bought at start would have cost £35k why would anybody sell for 10k . Hence y I won't be selling . Only ones interested in selling should be the penny share holders.

25 May 2018 06:08:46
Mols can't agree with your £12-15m this time round, can you give us a breakdown of your figures. On the £20m he lost before I would say S. African court papers show he received back over £18m of that amount. Remember he was on the creditor list at first but was dropped from it.

27 May 2018 14:29:17
IoM as u know I am not selling my shares for a measly 20P, last Thursday trading at 28p
Also I am at a loss re your statement how will king get money into country for SG to buy players.
At no time have I seen king say he will personally fund SG signings, our season ticket money, tv Money etc etc is in U. K. Not with king.
As I keep saying him and his family only have 14% holding in us

27 May 2018 20:08:25
2 points jboy we not broke even in the last 6 years but all of a sudden the ticket money and TV money we are going to finance SG bid for 55,please explain how that works. How do you thing SG came to us promises from King perhaps after all it was DKing who done the negotiations this time. Surely SG not came on on the promise of free agents and Liverpool reserve players?

28 May 2018 09:50:54
IoM u just don't listen everything twisted to suit u. I simply said our money does not sit in kings bank account.
Mark Allen done all negotiations ratified by king.
Let's support our team we r better than we were six years ago and when Ashley had claws into us

28 May 2018 22:56:10
What you mean Jboy, is your money does not sit in any bank account that's why you had to get a loan from Close brothers, the three million has to be paid back by the third of August, tick tock, tick tock, Tempus fugits, will you be able to pay it back?

29 May 2018 12:54:32
Jboy I twist everything to suit my argument?
All I did was comment on your statement that SG watchest would be financed by season books and TV money. I said that over the 6 years we not a profit, so how can SB and TV money the watchest?

29 May 2018 14:45:52
Read my post again, where do I say SG will be financed by season money and TV money

29 May 2018 19:55:12
At no time have I seen king say he will personally fund SG signings, our season ticket money, tv Money etc etc is in U. K. Not with king.

Explain what this mean then jboy

30 May 2018 13:20:52
Not with king means rangers FC money sits in a company bank account, not a personal bank account off kings.
He is not even a signatory on RFC bank account

30 May 2018 18:18:07
So our money (season book and TV money) is in the bank to finance SG tenure? Correct or not jboy?
If that's what your saying we have not made a profit in 6 years, so I ask you again jboy were the money coming from?

30 May 2018 22:59:10
IoM, not made a profit?, that sounds slightly better than made a loss, and the three million plus interest will have to be paid back on time to Close brothers, so that is three million plus yous will be less when it comes to working out your profit and loss next time, so will you need to borrow six million next time?, so something will need to change one way or the other, I am not one of your lot, but I find it fascinating how hardly anyone on your side seems to be bothered, but finance isn't my strong point so I have probably got it all wrong.

01 Jun 2018 16:18:04
aindoh, "finance isn't my strong point", you have to be joking? I thought every one of you "people" were experts on-
•finance
•tax law
•SFA rules
•UEFA rules
•corporate law
•employment legislation
•tax liability
•politics
•history &c
That's why you are the most hated group of supporters in British football 😂

22 May 2018 16:35:22
Not being negative honest 😂
Anyone heard anything about the share issue or more important D. KING getting a British Bank account to make his rands into pounds, which is need to be done before a share issue can take place.

Agree11 Disagree3

16 May 2018 15:34:52
As I have been namechecked by a few posters on here I thought I would reply to all in this post.
Regarding the SFA charge, do you all realise that it is not a "Tim conspiracy by Lawwell" but problems caused by firstly SFA people (and former Rangers men) Andrew Dickson and Campbell Ogilvie in omitting evidence regarding the "Wee Tax Case" monies owed. Then last year in court, Rangers directors ADMITTED lying to the SFA, the club had a moral duty to tell the truth, hence these charges.

I do not anticipate anything other than a fine for this 2011 transgression, but your club should be worried about THIS year's EURO licence because your club does not meet FFP rules. Again the likely scenario is UEFA allow your club entry this season but monitor you for next season, another big problem could also come from any european club you play who have the right to contest your eligibility for playing in european tournaments, this could lead to a ban also.

In summary your club has a lot of "hoops to jump through" (pun intended) and that is not even taking into account the TAP presently going through the courts.

Agree6 Disagree7

16 May 2018 15:47:51
Tim. I'm more worried about the time and effort you have but into that post. Think you guys need to relax a little. Your starting to almost sound worried. Lol

16 May 2018 21:47:02
if we didn’t meet the ffp we wouldn’t get the license so we’ll file that under bs and again tap has got nothing to do with the club it’s with dk so away and play tig way the buses

16 May 2018 22:15:23
Timalloy, #OBSSESED Way Glasgow Rangers 😀🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧

16 May 2018 20:58:11
Tim are we a new club or old club for the sake of this SFA investigation, what argument suits you this time?
And while I have your attention you posted some nonsense about scaffolding and roofs at Ibrox, where do you get all this nonsense from, someone who’s mad with three names maybe?

16 May 2018 21:01:09
Timalloy are you phil mcgonna go away and stop talking rubbish tim in disguise?

17 May 2018 00:01:52
Timalloy can you explain how you know we won't pass for. Clubs are allowed to run at a loss. Directors are allowed to invest or subsidise club bills by up to 22 million pounds over a 3 year period. Do you actually know anything about ffp?

17 May 2018 06:53:49
Hey Timalloy there will be a few hoops getting brought up in Glasgow in June alright 👍

17 May 2018 19:11:40
timalloy of course it has to do with lawell and co he is noticing we have got a new manager and are starting to sign quality players so the wee team from the east end starting crying to the sfa that big bad rangers are getting stronger and will beat us next season so please sfa try and put them down again
anyway rangers were found not guilty by the sfa for the same charge so you cannot be charged for the same crime twice so it is just a ploy by you lot to try and stir up some shi* and I will bet you nothing will come out of this because rangers lawyers with tie that corrupt lot in knots
anyway you sleeping alright at nights and hope your not worrying about us coming to get you

19 May 2018 12:34:33
True-blue. You actually can be tried for a charge twice now under double jeapordy. Just ask Angus Sinclair, who got away with murder but was found guilty the 2nd time.

15 May 2018 16:34:59
SFA charge the club with us getting the UEFA License in 2010? Don't know how the hell they can charge us 7 years later with Craig Whyte in charge? Big Liewell is obviously in and about this 😡🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧.

Agree1 Disagree3

15 May 2018 18:03:42
Charging us in a case they already found us not guilty

15 May 2018 18:47:49
Also mark guidi stating UEFA can't take action as time barred after five years

15 May 2018 21:11:02
So we are the same club when it suits them lol

15 May 2018 21:53:51
My take on this- It was proved in court that Murray and the board knew we owed the money to the tax man for the wee tax case but told the SFA it was in dispute. That was not the case Murray was desperate and pulled the wool over the SFA eyes. In saying we are the same club if proved guilty we will need to face the fine. We can't have it all ways 'it was the old board/ company / club'. We accepted all the old board liabilities to get the licence. It will probably be a fine of 50 or 60k

16 May 2018 11:26:29
Hope u r right about size of fine. I see sfa going in about 200 k

16 May 2018 13:57:01
I'm more interested in the SFAs role in this- Are they a bunch of corrupt individuals and if so they should all get the bag. Its not fit for purpose

16 May 2018 15:27:45
@IoM - for once I agree with you! The club needs to face up to misdemeanours from previous regimes.
I also believe the SFA have played a blinder. By charging Rangers they have sent out a statement we are still the same club meaning 6 years of moon howling from the unwashed has been fruitless.

16 May 2018 21:49:59
What ever they want to fine us can come out the league money from that season that we never received

16 May 2018 23:51:13
@Union Jack: That being the case ( Rangers being the same club) and you can hold onto your titles, and yes you do know what's coming.
Rangers can then be held accountable for ALL the debts you (owe) .
along with all the EBT`s that were used by certain players/ staff.
As a few have said, you can`t have your cake and eat it.

Whats your thoughts on that?

17 May 2018 16:51:29
the same issue you lot always misunderstand: club and company, two separate entities. Rangers paid the football debts as an item of necessity for the CLUB membership to be transferred to a new COMPANY, the other debts of the old company are currently being dealt with by liquidators, so no they wouldn't be held accountable for any debts. By the way, the cake tastes great ;)

19 May 2018 10:35:25
In reply to Pete boy

I’m no expert on ebt s as I’m no a tim however my understanding is ebts are loans pain back by the estate on death, if that’s the case and we are still due all those millions back then yes we should pay any money the club owes.

I’m sure you will let me know if that is correct or not.

19 May 2018 17:08:53
Hey Pete boy what about Celtics use of ebt, s does that count?

22 May 2018 18:07:43
Tin man, I think they recognised the problem and how dubious it might be so stopped at one ebt which was then cancelled (correct me if I am wrong)

15 May 2018 07:29:54
Following my earlier comments on the Paul Murray resignation I had a look at his involvement with our club, after prompting from my old sparring partner, DK17.
He has worked tirelessly in the background to help save our club and deserves full credit and thanks for everything he has done.
I have never been a fan of his, but what do I know? However, it is more the pity that our chairman could not thank him for his service in keeping our club alive, instead of ridiculous comment about not knowing why Mr Paul Murray resigned.
DK17, I noted his potential house sale, but that could be for many reasons, and is personal to PM. All I will say is that he has, obviously, done well for himself, while working tirelessly for our great club. I hope he gets the credit he deserves for his efforts and does well in the future.

Agree6 Disagree0

15 May 2018 08:52:06
Billy
I agree that perhaps DK could have said more but I’m certain that the issue with PM is down to personal issues.
His house has been sold but there is more to it.
I would think that he needs to spend more time on his own business affairs.
DK is far from perfect but so is PM.
If PM feels that he has been let down by DK, he is a big boy. he can tell us all himself

15 May 2018 09:26:32
DK17, The chairman had no problem giving John Gilligan credit for his service to the club, when he resigned, so no matter PM's personal circumstances or any disagreements he had in the club, a few words of thanks would have been the thing to do. I do not want to labour a point, but our chairman lacks class.

15 May 2018 10:18:24
Bill, that I agree with. i'm pretty sure he has spoke to him though.

15 May 2018 10:33:33
I’m more concerned about the playing side rather than if PM deserves a pat on the back for services rendered!

15 May 2018 12:36:56
UJ, roll on the 12th. July, then.

15 May 2018 13:27:18
UJ. our club is far more than the playing side but, unfortunately, some of our "fans" think that is all that matters.
Right from the top of our club we must have dignity and earn respect, and that is why our history has left us where we were. However, the people that have ran our club in recent years have brought us into disrepute, so until we regain the respect we earned through our tradition and dignity, we will struggle.
Just remember we are more than just a football club, and if you are only interested in the footballing team and it winning, you should either re-consider your values or go and watch some other team.

15 May 2018 16:18:22
Agree billy but would add that our fans need to show some dignity also.

Clearly we have players who are not good enough for Glasgow Rangers but the ARE Glasgow Rangers players and deserve support from our supporters.

Boo's from our own supporters are embarrassing and not in the tradition of the club

15 May 2018 19:31:44
DK. I agree that giving stick to our own isn’t great but there have been plenty who have been given grief in recent memory.

Cammy Fraser flicking the vs at Ibrox after scoring due to the stick he was getting. “Ally, get tae fxck, Ally, Ally get tae fxxk ” bellowing from the stands at Ibrox after yet another miss, etc.

It would be great for it to be traditional not to boo our own be we have, do and will when they are mince or play poorly.

15 May 2018 20:01:42
Dignity should be from the board, through the staff, management team, the team and then the support, but unfortunately there are muppets in every section. We then have clowns that think that only results matter, they are not Rangers supporters but purely glory hunters, so UJ take a bow.

15 May 2018 22:06:34
Hi Billy mate hope you are well
UJ only pops on here to police us if we fall out of line of everything wonderful, SG here, before that it was all OK pedro here and how can we forget the magic hat. The club is so much more than players and managers. We need to get the basic right, then things will fall into place but at the moment we are not.

16 May 2018 15:15:25
@billyb - does that acting with ‘ dignity ‘ extend to negative posters like yourself who constantly slate the board?
I would have thought we are all entitled to our opinions and mine hasn’t changed - playing side or a pat on the back for PM? You already know my thoughts.
And I’ve thought about your offer but sorry Rangers are the only team for me - Then, Now and Forever 🔴⚪️🔵

16 May 2018 15:32:43
I completely agree with uj here. I think you've disregarded your post when you stated our fans are Muppets, clowns and glory hunters. Etc. Just because a fan can not attend every game doesn't make them any a less of a supporter then you bill b. So UJ I'm with you pal. Winning is everything.

16 May 2018 21:36:19
UJ and Mee,
Winning is great but has to be earned, I of M makes a very valid point about what we stand for, and it is way above just winning. DK17 and bruised bear also make valid points, and yes you see me as negative, I disagree. What I do feel is that some our fans just accept what is fed to them, but I can assure you that all WILL come out very soon, and I truly believe that we will return our standards to those formed by our forefathers.

I have disagreed with DK17 many times but he has made the most telling statement in this post, and that is in his first sentence. We, as the backbone of the club, must show DIGNITY, and then we will be in a better place.

11 May 2018 22:13:42
Hi jboy just saw your reply to my FACT about the up and coming share issue

Restrictions on dealings by the offer or (D. King) and the concert parties (the 3bears)
During an offer period, the offer or and persons acting in concert must not sell any securities in the offeree company.
B) during an offer period, the offeror and persons acting in concert with it must NOT aquire an interest in ANY securities of the offeree company.

Agree2 Disagree2

12 May 2018 07:11:01
Well that’s cleared that up then!

12 May 2018 07:34:13
Iom source please. I don’t agree

12 May 2018 08:23:23
Colster don't be so under armour

12 May 2018 11:44:57
IOM

You may be right but have you considered that the TAP offer may be put in place and concluded before any share issue is offered, which based on your assessment would be valid. He is probably being deliberately evasive in his strategy and while frustrating for the fans I would still much prefer his unsecured loans than Ashley secured loans accepting that the situation continues to drag Rangers down

12 May 2018 14:19:07
TOP
Section E
Restrictions on dealing
Rule 4
Check it out jboy you being a financial man wonder WHY you didn't know that rule.

12 May 2018 15:32:17
Yep you got me there!
But how about just getting behind the team rather than lie awake every night thinking what negative comment you could write the next day. I've never read a positive post from you yet. F#$% me . your house will be easy to spot with the big dark cloud sitting over it!

12 May 2018 16:26:44
What do you want to do colster tell this board the truth or tell them rumours about 3 year deal with under armour or about massive investment from various parts of the world and Edinburgh. Believe it or not some people on here are Rangers fans but are not now lead by the Scottish media after their performance in the last 6-7 years. From the Motherwell billionaire, through Charles Green Dallas cowboys team up and now SG massive war chest. All to keep us happy.

12 May 2018 17:34:18
Tell me what exactly King has done wrong. Would you rather the club was still in the hands of Green, Ashley or lambias? Ok the board f@-&£d up with the Pedro appointment but they backed him none the less. We’ve went all in appointing SG. but if you think he has come up here without some sort of financial backing then your deluded. If you also think they have made this appointmoment to embezzle season ticket money then you are doubley deluded. King has said all along the soft loans will be converted into shares and the board will continue to make up any short fall . The offer to shareholders will not be taken up and you know as well as anyone . so why are you getting your frillies in a twist. Whether there is or isn’t investment coming in the summer only time will tell

12 May 2018 20:29:46
Yes time will tell colster and I do hope your right. King said the loans will be converted to shares did you read my above post mate. That can't be do til D King put his rands into pound note in a UK bank. What's King done wrong well were do we start, Nomad, transparency, look how I got rid of Ashley not telling us that he paid £3m, unaudited accounts, our main man should live in the UK at least. These are all personal highlighting them doesn't made me a TIM or a less Rangers man then the rumours loony on here.

12 May 2018 21:29:39
Sorry IOM but you can spout all the facts (as you see them) and figures that you like.

The most important fact is that Dave King is the one who dug deep to but enough shares to rescue us from the shysters Whyte, Green, Ashley and the Greenock busboys.

You can continue to be negative but unless there is someone with deep pockets out there waiting to invest and but out enough shareholders you are wasting your time.

In my view, DK is far from perfect but he is the best and only option that we have for now. he has my support whilst he is improving the club.

There will come a point where he cannot take us any further but by then we will be in a position where we are a more attractive proposition for new investors.

12 May 2018 21:51:33
DK17, surprise, surprise, I agree with IoM. Not on all the detail but on dk being an out and out liar. I know you think I'm paranoid, but consider this:-
Straight from dk's press question and answer------- Question-- Why did paul murray resign?
Answer-- I do not know, but I met him in Mr Singh's while having a meal with Donald Park, but did not have the chance to speak! . THE DEFENCE RESTS.

12 May 2018 22:19:53
Nae bother columbo🤷‍♂️

12 May 2018 22:38:23
Billy, as usual you have assumed that there is something negative that has caused Paul Murray to resign. could it equally be that he has personal issues that stop him from co tribute game to the club as much as he would like?

Google it and see what comes up. sold house.

13 May 2018 07:16:58
I am not trying to be negative DK17, but he must know, so if he did not want to respond, why did he not just say --- it is a private matter OR just say ----- no comment, at present.

09 May 2018 00:11:40
Guys transfer budget is £16m NOT £6m

"At the moment I'm thinking probably £6 million new cash and the balance converted to loans, " King said, as quoted by the Times. "We'll be looking at [a total] just over £16m. Right now it's £6m and £10m in loans but we might go £8m and £8m. We've not yet made our final decision but it won't be less than £6m new cash.

"It will happen I would say definitely by the end of June. It will be in sufficient time for all the close season activity that we are looking to do. ".

Agree2 Disagree24

10 May 2018 11:55:55
We'll only know the budget when this window closes. You don't open your wallet in front of a thief.

15 May 2018 17:15:06
There is also a World Cup so a few players will be hedging their bets before signing for anyone

 


Rangers Finances


Rangers Finances 2

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass