17 May 2023 07:13:13
Apparently Palma is not on rangers list of targets any1 any info.


1.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 07:31:23
I've said it previously, but I wasn't quite as sold on this deal as most of our posters - so would be quietly relieved if this was true.


2.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 07:40:40
Wouldn't surprise me if we weren't in for him, everyone seems to get linked with us. It would be an interesting one if he did come as he definitely looks talented but then again that has let us down before.


3.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 08:50:52
I've read we're offering very near the 4.4 million his club want.


4.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 09:08:46
Told we are definitely interested in Palma ows.


5.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 10:38:10
Rangers have met palma.


6.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 10:48:29
Rangers today stated he is not on our list of targets.


7.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 10:52:57
Luis Palma would be an ideal replacement for Kent IMO. We want someone who has more end product and this lad has that. Look at the way he hits a dead ball (free-kicks and corners) the movement and accuracy he gets is top level. If he can shoot like that from open play he’ll be unreal. On the Rangers Review a jurnalist from that country said he can dribble at pace, he might not have the trickery of Kent, but the end product is there.


8.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 11:09:39
We are in for him, however there are several other teams looking too, some from bigger leagues than ours.


9.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 12:10:05
Rangers stated this today theglasgowranger, never seen this.


10.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 12:42:23
Regardless of we are or are not interested 4.4 million seems a bit pricey to me.

As I said before especially with our track record of failed wingers.


11.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 13:24:40
The Daily Record stated that he is not on our list of targets, Rangers never stated anything . Why would they? We are going to be busy if we are putting out statements about every transfer rumour. If it was me, I would be happy if the press were linking guys we are not interested in, it mean we can go about our business quietly in the background while they chase wild rumours.


12.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 14:18:08
Folks we can talk to player then decide it’s not for us.


13.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 17:36:06
John if a deal for trusty has hit a snag for 2m does that suggest that the 15m iv read MB will have is optimistic?


14.) 17 May 2023
17 May 2023 17:51:30
Aye cause rangers tells the daily record about all their targets ?.


15.) 19 May 2023
17 May 2023 18:19:35
On the Rangers Review they had a Greek reporter on who said that the clubs were definitely in dialogue.


16.) 19 May 2023
17 May 2023 19:08:12
Said the other day the deal was done and got shot down for it! Coming from a friend at ibrox the deal is done.