04 Feb 2024 21:42:22
Hey guys was told tonight that baligon and Jack will be offered rolling one year extension mainly for cover and there leadership influence within the dressing room. Lunny has be offered a 2 year extension, but wants 3 to 4 year contract taking him up to aged 34 as would like to finish his career at Rangers. The rest who's contract are about to expire, will be allowed to leave.

1.) 04 Feb 2024
04 Feb 2024 22:09:19
If we get that boy Barron I reckon we would let Jack go we have bailey rice aswell.

2.) 04 Feb 2024
04 Feb 2024 22:22:12
Think ryan jack is a very good player amd 1 of my favourites. Butnhes injured far to often there's no way he should get a new deal we need to move forward. This hanging on to players far to long needs to stop.

3.) 04 Feb 2024
04 Feb 2024 22:26:51
Will trust the managers decision on all of these. For me I would let Balogun and Jack go now with a thank you for their service. Would be happy to see Lundstrum offered a 3 year deal.

4.) 05 Feb 2024
04 Feb 2024 23:16:16
Cooper got to say balagun has been good this season unless we have a better replacement I'd keep him jack I love but I think the injuries are killing us in a season it's disrupted the consistency of the team too often.

5.) 05 Feb 2024
04 Feb 2024 23:18:04
Jack well worth a squad place if he retires from international duty after euros.

6.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 00:40:57
Would only keep Jack if we can get him on a contract for less than 5k a week basic with bonuses if he actually plays.

7.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 00:59:13
I’d keep jack on a vastly reduced basic contract and bonuses for meeting fitness requirements
Something that is fair all round. Not just for us.
If he is fit he gets paid . If he doesn’t go for that he’s free to leave

Balogun is on a low wage anyway and is more than deserving of being 4th choice defender next season, aslong as we sign a real top class cb to start with Goldson or even 2 new starters and move Conor on along with Davies.

8.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 01:23:26
Ludicrous to consider giving Jack another contract.

9.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 01:59:29
Unless we're paying Jack in freddos he's not worth extending. Likely far more reliable and cheaper squad options in the summer.

10.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 05:21:08
Jack is on around 8k I believe he would take 4/ 5k a week as it is more than he would get elsewhere for comparison Lowry is on around 6.5k a week who is more likely to actually play in regards to balogun would keep him before Ben Davies a 3 year contract for lunny would be ok but would be adding in some sort of clause like in his last year can get payed off for like half of his years wage incase he chucks it.

11.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 06:22:29
The manager is building a young squad of players keeping these 3 are a no brainer to me. Managing Jack's game time to 20 games a season is the answer.

12.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 07:22:05
Silva- Signing a player for 20 games would need to be on a pay per play basis (can't have someone playing a half to a third less games than anyone else but on a big salary) - we have played on sentiment for too long and that's one of the reasons we have trailed the Eastenders over the years - this needs to stop and we should only resign players if they give definitive benefit to the team moving forward - I feel PC will start to manage this situation better as we can't have half a team of hangers on any more if we want our club to truly progress. I love what most of these players have given to Gers but time moves on and so must we.

13.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 08:14:26
Football wise Ryan Jack isn't on a big salary. If we bring in Barron the boy will need time to settle I'd personally keep Jack but its ultimately the managers call.

14.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 08:26:50
1 year rolling contract for Ryan Jack?
Depends on the details of the contract to be fair on both Parties but I’m open minded about it.

15.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 08:35:13
Not for me jacks time should be up.

16.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 08:39:12
We should have done that with Arfield he deserved it.

17.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 09:09:52
No please no, why are we hanging on to sentiment. time is up for Jack as he is now a liability. if he was on a pay for play contract fine but i would be against paying him to sit in the docs office.

18.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 09:44:51
For me, Jack remains the best midfield option at the club. I would far rather see him get the new deal than Lundstram. I've been told that Lundstram is likely to move to Gerrard's team in Saudi anyway.

19.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 09:48:52
I would happily give Jack another year - perhaps on a pay per play basis. He played well on Saturday and started the move that set up the 3rd goal. Good experience in the dressing room.

20.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 10:12:55
Lets give roofe a new deal too then?

21.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 11:59:10
TBH never heard of a player getting a rolling contract seems strange to me.

22.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 12:15:55
Balogoun on a very low wage ( for our players ), possibly makes more with appearances, I hope so has deserved it, when you think what Davies will be on, we give out contracts and once it’s signed they are due it I suppose just a shame the amount of waste of money are not kicking a ball for us.

23.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 12:33:54
Balogun needs to be given a coaching role. He knows the score and is a very intelligent footballing man.

24.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 14:56:07
I wouldn't give either of them a new contract. Jack can't stay fit and the only reason that Balogun would surely get a new contract would be if we don't sign a quality centre back. Davies should go and we should be signing two quality new centre backs with Souttar and King as back up assuming that Clements rates them.

25.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 15:46:21
Happy to leave it up to big Phil and support his decision.

26.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 16:10:51
Jack our best midfielder? Going of what the 60 mins he’s played this season utter nonsense.

27.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 16:44:14
Jack helps with home trained quota for euro squad, we already lost 3 places in the euro squad due to not meeting the quota of 8, if we punt him he needs replaced with another Scottish trained player and not many out there as good as him so for me it’s a no brainier to keep him.

28.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 18:40:56
I’d say replacing goldson a priority already would have been away but clubs the standard he wanted didn’t come in for him.

29.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 22:56:49
Born a blue but were do we get money for a Scottish midfielder to replace jack especially when most of our budget will again go on forwards

Silva only a loan
Sima a loan
Cortes a loan
Monies will be due for diomande

Jack getting us through another year for Scottish quota makes sense.

30.) 05 Feb 2024
05 Feb 2024 22:57:59
Also jack has been more available for squad than raskin has at his time with our club.