Rangers Discussion Posts 3

16 Mar 2026 14:16:53
Finally Curtis in the upcoming Scotland squad.

16 Mar 2026 15:38:55
The Steve Clarke - Killie factor. Like it. Up goes his value.

16 Mar 2026 16:08:14
Hopefully, we get a decent sell-on clause.

16 Mar 2026 16:26:02
Why a sell-on, John? Do you not expect him back?

I find it crazy; if we let him go, he could be our version of James Forrest going forward.

Different players, but I mean, he's good enough to do that.

16 Mar 2026 16:42:18
Stevie, Killie and Rangers websites both say loan until end of season. Surely they would have said with an option to buy. With Skov Olsen they say a loan with an option to make permanent. So, like you, I think he will be back.

16 Mar 2026 17:19:56
Yeah, Angus, for me he's way too good to go.

He's not another Lowry, as he works extremely hard on the park, and he is a goals/assist threat. He plays numerous positions, and is young, with bags of potential.

If Rohl doesn't keep him it will be a big mark against him from me. I'm already wondering about Rohl now, but not against him yet.

16 Mar 2026 17:23:11
Get Curtis and Cameron back for next season and give youth a chance, plenty of empty shirts to fill.

16 Mar 2026 17:36:29
Agree, Stevie, but I think both will be back.
Re doubts, there are always question marks around every manager when things aren't going entirely to plan. I often wonder why any manager makes a particular sub, but without knowing what he is thinking, I can't say for sure it was the wrong sub, just because I disagreed with it, or even if the result doesn't go to plan.



We need to give at least one manager the time to make mistakes at times and play through them. Not sure that will happen in my lifetime though. 😂

16 Mar 2026 17:44:25
I'm sure John alluded to there being an option to buy for 900k the other day.

16 Mar 2026 18:14:39
Stevie, a story is Killie have an option of 900k, Aberdeen have an option on Cameron at 600 k.


Both players were called out re lack of effort in training.

Curtis may be back. I'd be surprised if Cameron plays much for us. He will leave in summer.

16 Mar 2026 18:40:25
John, cheers for info, mate. I hope the Killie one doesn't happen, or maybe isn't the case, just as long as Curtis is back for us.

Cameron is a player I like, and for me is exactly what we're missing in mf the now.

I doubt he'll be back though.

16 Mar 2026 19:20:20
I very much hope he doesn't leave, John, esp for such a pitance. Perhaps, if he wasn't doing it, the loan has been the kick he needs, and it's worked, and also the call up will help him see the potential he has if he grabs it with both hands. So many others have just drifted away after promising starts.

16 Mar 2026 19:40:29
Cheers, Angus and John.

16 Mar 2026 20:02:10
I can actually see Cameron not coming back. However, I always think PR departments use the same sort of language every time. They just have Cameron as a season-long loan. It might just be they don't say option or obligation, so I checked Cortes and they said option with that.


None of this proves anything at all, and not doubting John's rumour, just the way my brain works. 🤷

16 Mar 2026 20:48:28
Stevie, I don't think Killie could afford the price unless we wanted Watson.

16 Mar 2026 21:40:01
We are absolutely terrible at this. We loan out players and never bring them back. Cameron and Curtis have great potential; their fees are criminal.

17 Mar 2026 00:01:39
And therein lies the secret weapon they might pull out of their sleeve then, John?

Is Watson not out of contract in summer? And, our fee we'd be required to pay would likely be 400-600k.

Who knows, but I'd much rather have Curtis in my squad than Watson.

17 Mar 2026 10:25:31
Stevie, I agree. I also don't see the merit in selling them Curtis whilst getting Watson. If he only costs that, and we want him, we buy him anyway as he is OOC and we don't need Killie permission to buy.

I also don't see the rationale in Rohl playing Curtis, even as a sub, right up to the last minute (the Porto game) if he didn't rate him and we are looking to sell.

Not saying it won't happen, but it just doesn't make sense to me.

17 Mar 2026 10:51:49
Curtis' price will be far higher than 900k. Can't see him not being a Rangers player next season.

17 Mar 2026 11:04:36
My star, how is that?

17 Mar 2026 11:15:24
You think Rangers will sell Curtis for 900k? John, never happening, imo. He seems to be kicking on with regular games, I believe he'll get starts for Rangers next season.

17 Mar 2026 11:31:06
Go and ask Bowie re price on option to buy my sky.

17 Mar 2026 11:55:53
John, don't get it? I just can't see Rangers selling Curtis for a fee even remotely close to 900k, mate.

17 Mar 2026 13:25:05
Why is Bowie relevant, as he was permanent at Hibs and is now in Italy, so never had an option.

Star Curtis price on Transfermrkt is 900k Euros, which might be where the price comes from. 🤷

17 Mar 2026 14:36:41
John or any1, I know you alluded to option to buy, which we have used in the past. So, if an option to buy is written into a deal, I get the player can refuse, but can the selling club also refuse? There's no obligation to buy, only an option, so surely that's between both clubs if both agree, so my thinking, I'd say the selling club could still refuse.

Can you enlighten me about this, if anyone knows?

17 Mar 2026 14:54:47
Davie, I think that the option protects the buying club, i.e., the selling club, if the conditions of the loan are met, would have to sell. There will most likely be penalty clauses if the deal isn't met.

So, think Tillman, where Bayern had to pay us to allow them to cancel the option we had.

If it is an obligation that protects the selling club, then the scenario, I think, would be vice versa.

17 Mar 2026 17:02:44
Angus, think Bowie as in Bowie tankers, not Bowie the player.

17 Mar 2026 18:50:09
Geesa, cheers for that. The relevance had gone straight over my head (like a lot of things). He might have mentioned it to his PR department, though, who said it was a straight loan. 🤷

17 Mar 2026 21:09:26
Option has to be agreed by the player and both clubs, it is not a binding deal.

16 Mar 2026 13:52:57
See Curtis in the Scotland squad, that wouldn't have happened if still a Rangers player, he wouldn't have got enough minutes, glad he's doing well at Kilmarnock, he'll be involved far more for us next season, good experience on loan is what he needed, imo.

16 Mar 2026 14:46:40
Brilliant news.
But, he would have got those minutes if we didn't decide to develop another team's player, or pin our hopes on a player rediscovering his form from 3 years ago.

16 Mar 2026 14:56:46
Maybe MPH, but on the other hand, this is exactly what we would hope for normally from sending a young player out on loan to gain experience. Could turn out to be the best thing for both him and us.

If we'd never made signings and just gambled on our kids, the place would be in uproar. The others are here until our kids prove they are ready, which seems to be happening. Delighted with this news.

16 Mar 2026 14:57:03
MPH, I know you don't rate the player, but you are normally at least objective in your answers.

We are not pinning hopes on a player rediscovering form from 3 years ago.

We are trying to provide a platform for a player to rediscover the form he had in the early stages of 2025.


Unfortunately, the move from Brugge did not work out and he has hardly played since.

16 Mar 2026 14:58:36
Spot on, MPH.

Hopefully he will get his chance next season, as the two you allude to will be back to where they came from. It is embarrassing that we own a player deemed not good enough for our struggling team in the Scotland squad.

16 Mar 2026 15:19:20
He is performing well in a less pressurised environment as well for his first regular starts as a young player. I don't think it was that he wasn't deemed good enough for us, but that he wasn't ready to start regularly for us.



The Scotland call-up is an additional bonus for the young lad, and will hopefully add to his growing confidence. He will need it when he comes back to us next season.

16 Mar 2026 15:35:01
I rate Skov Olsen from a couple of years back, Aph.
But, when you have titles and cups to be won, you don't boost the squad for a title run-in on ifs, buts and maybes.
Now, I would love nothing better to be proved wrong. But right now I'm failing to see a winger of his past quality and experience ripping it up.

16 Mar 2026 16:23:07
Mph, I think that is the problem. The club's expectations and knowledge are far different from the fans'.

16 Mar 2026 16:24:40
What I mean by that is the club is building a squad for the long term, not just the short term.
Skov Olsen was brought in because the opportunity presented itself to get him now rather than the summer.

I do believe the club will keep its commitment to the player and sign permanently in the summer.

16 Mar 2026 17:07:13
Personally I can't see any way he's here next season. Aph, the club's expectations. It's not hard to figure out he's not playing like a 9mill player. Lucky current form, if anybody would pay 900k.

16 Mar 2026 17:40:23
I just want to know where these players are who are guaranteed to hit the ground running and win us titles. We haven't managed to find them up till now, so they obviously aren't that easy to find. So, does every signing not have that element of risk about them?
We are 3 behind with 8 games to go, so he still has time to find form.

I still reckon we will buy him for next season, though; might haggle on price. Paul, you are in charge, but I'll let you away with getting him for £1M. 😉 A joke, by the way, in case you or anyone is offended.

16 Mar 2026 17:46:31
Unless his form gets better quickly, he better not be at Rangers next season. He is showing nothing to spank 7/8 million on him; better spent elsewhere.

16 Mar 2026 21:41:34
Honestly, he's a downgrade on Curtis imo.

16 Mar 2026 12:55:10
I believe part of our attacking issue is that Chermiti and Naderi are projects, Gassamma is inconsistent and Mooore is only 18 so can't expect him to deliver every game. Maybe this is where the experience of ASO, Aasgaard and ASO will help define our end to the season.

16 Mar 2026 13:34:14
I dread to think if we're putting our hopes on them 2.

16 Mar 2026 15:23:08
Bizz, we will be buying a lot of players who are thought to be able to contribute to the first team whilst being developed to sell on for profit. It is where we are in the feeding chain, unfortunately. Sometimes, like with Igamane, it works 100%; other times the players take more time to reach that potential. Next season, they will have this season's experience under their belts, and we will add a mix of further development and more experienced players.

So, this season will, if nothing else, make us better prepared for next season. How that works out for the end of this season is anyone's guess, but no-one in the top 3 are blowing teams away atm.

15 Mar 2026 16:48:47
I honestly have no idea how this season is going to end.

What I will say though is that games like that today are not the kind of matches many of our players want to be involved in. The weather was atrocious, the pitch was a mess, and a Sunday morning kick-off doesn't exactly help either. Some players are clearly more comfortable in better conditions and a milder climate, where the game flows more naturally instead of turning into a battle.

That's why players like Barron stand out. You can see he's right up for those kinds of games. I said from the start he'd come good, and it's time people stopped downplaying the boy's heart and desire. Instead of knocking him, we should be lifting him up. If half the team had his engine, commitment, and willingness to dig in when things get ugly, we'd be in a much better position.

Today wasn't pretty, but we got through it. And to be honest, players are going to have to get used to matches like that if they're planning on staying here beyond the summer. Scottish football in the winter isn't always about pretty passing or perfect surfaces. Some grounds will turn into mud baths and the weather will test you. If you want to play for Rangers, you need to be able to handle that and still perform.

The bigger picture is that this season has been a strange one. But if we start next season the way we started this one, we won't have a chance of clawing back a big points gap again. Falling 12–13 points behind early is something you might recover from once, but it's not something you can rely on happening every year.

We also need to be realistic about the standards we're chasing. Over the last four seasons Celtic have typically dropped very few points usually around 3–4 draws and 3–4 defeats in a league campaign. That's the level of consistency we have to match or beat if we want to seriously challenge for the title.

Looking at our own numbers this season tells the story. Losing only two games isn't terrible when you consider how the season has felt, but 12 draws is far too many if you want to win leagues. Those dropped points add up quickly.

Next season we need a squad that's ready from day one physically, mentally, and with the right mentality for the league we play in. Fast starts matter, consistency matters, and the standards have to be higher across the board if we're serious about competing again.
Just my opinion.

15 Mar 2026 19:58:57
Stig, I agree about next season and the need for a quick start. However, everyone in our team and on the bench is either Northern European or came from a Northern European league. So, the weather in Scotland isn't worse than those countries, so it shouldn't have been a shock.

Doesn't matter where you are from, though, the wind plays a factor in lots of games. It seemed to be bad for corners etc, even if delivery was poor.

Quality of pitch I give you, and today it seemed poor.

15 Mar 2026 21:36:43
He never showed any quality when he came on. Let's not make up lies. We didn't get any better when he came in either.

15 Mar 2026 22:17:56
Storm, he did help us see out the 1-0 win though: 15/15 passes made successfully; 100% tackles (only 1 granted); 2/4 ground duels won and 1 out of 2 aerial duals and recovered the ball 3 times. So, in the 18 minutes he was on, he didn't do anything wrong and made us more difficult to play through, i.e.

helped us see out the game.
No-one is saying he is Zidane apart from you. Most say he has heart and energy and is a good option to have.

15 Mar 2026 22:21:37
He should be starting ahead of Raskin for me.

15 Mar 2026 22:26:31
Stevie, I think Raskin needs to be played ahead of him, but on the pitch. Raskin isn't the defensive MF we need, and he needs to stop kidding himself he is. Get his energy further up the field, where he can influence play. Room in the team for both imo. Chukwuani has gone a bit off the boil as well, so competition will possibly help.

16 Mar 2026 01:01:15
Barron is a good player who gets not one bit of credit from them, who saw nothing of him at the start of his Rangers career. Barron has improved greatly as a Rangers player.

16 Mar 2026 12:33:23
For me right now, Raskin would be 4th choice cm whether that's in a 3 or a 2. For me, he's our best mf, but this season has been very poor.

16 Mar 2026 12:54:42
Stevie-G, Do you think Raskin has one eye on the World Cup and doesn't want to take any chances of him not getting in the Belgium squad if he gets injured? I know if you are holding back on tackling, sometimes if you go in half hearted there is more chance of injury.

He started the season off like a Wee Jack Russell, and plays more like a poodle now.

16 Mar 2026 13:28:05
If Raskin doesn't perform he's taking a chance on not being picked, Jorg.

16 Mar 2026 13:48:35
Angus, I can make pass after pass if it's 2 yards to the side. He didn't make things any better when he came on. Funny, you are using stats, but when others use stats against one of your arguments, you then say stats aren't everything. 🤣

16 Mar 2026 14:10:11
Storm, stats aren't everything, and I normally put some context into those others who post them. So, please feel free to add context if you wish. But, to add some context, he had 1 key pass (which created a shooting chance), 1 long range pass. However, according to the map on SofaScore, 6-7 of those passes were across half the width of the pitch, so not all 2 yards side to side.

Oh, and I don't believe that you could do those 2 yard passes in the SPL either, but continue to dream like me and all fans.

You see what research can do to prove your point. Or you could just call him a headless chicken, or make some sarcastic comment about him being Zidane. However, I know that is beneath you. 👍

16 Mar 2026 14:14:44
Albertz, I think he'd be silly to do that, mate, as he's risking not being picked, as Beale pointed out.

Luckily for him he's performed world class for Belgium. He's been their best player in at least half his games for them.

I don't know what's wrong with him in a Rangers shirt; it has to be the tactics not suiting him.

16 Mar 2026 16:25:28
Stevie-G, That is true in what you are saying regarding his Belgium place. It is just I felt he seemed to be hungry when Danny came in, and not so much now. As you said, it may be tactics.

I always felt he would do well in the Fergie roll, just sitting in, moving the ball around. On the back of that last bit, there isn't much moving about in front of him most of the time lately.

16 Mar 2026 18:56:17
Albertz, yeah mate, I thought the 6 would be his best position too.

That's where he plays for Belgium, and he excels.

I don't know what the future holds for Raskin, but if his form doesn't pick up, we may well still have him next season.

15 Mar 2026 15:18:06
Just after reading various reports that west ham very interested in signing our centre half manny Fernandez this summer🤔I genuinely think there will be a lot of interest in him and there's already stories circulating that 3 German clubs are also interested in signing him at the end of the season 🤔If we get offers in what fee bracket should we accept for the sale of big Fernandez 🤔I would honestly say no less than £15 million 🤔🇬🇧

15 Mar 2026 16:24:34
Swsobe, I'd say no less than 20, but be looking for nearer the 25, honestly.

15 Mar 2026 16:44:36
Only if they don't sign Alex Disai.

15 Mar 2026 22:22:20
I'd hit them with £20m rising to £25m and a 10% sell on.

16 Mar 2026 08:47:44
Stevie, I agree. We don't want to lose him, as he will improve. So best way is to price him out of the market. 😉

16 Mar 2026 09:54:12
The improvement in Fernandez in a few months is quite incredible. Hopefully, he's still a Rangers player next season, but if he keeps on improving at the same rate, we won't be able to keep him. We will make some profit on him. Fernandez has the lot for a modern cb.

16 Mar 2026 12:35:40
Angus, people keep saying when f us value a player high. "He's not worth that." But the point is we shouldn't be selling players for what we think they're worth. We should be asking more than that, and if a club want them enough, then they'll pay it, and that's where I'm at with that price.



Plus an epl team will always pay a higher amount than a German or French or butch etc og u hold out for it.

16 Mar 2026 12:53:04
Stevie, I honestly don't think it matters what fans value a player at. Do you think any club, when they are looking at our players, consider that?

The main consideration is what Rangers value him at, and I don't think it will be £25M at the moment. Also, I don't think they consider what we think he is worth. tbh, I would be surprised if it was anywhere near £15 after 8 months or so at this level; he has a lot of growth required.

Using Bassey as a comparison, the time he stayed with us and his European exposure - do you think that Fernandez is worth more than him? Not about undervaluing players though, but simply being what I consider to be realistic.

But, tbh, I know nothing about how to value a player. We place prices, as fans, on players because of what Celtic got for their players, and that isn't the best method.

But mainly, I would want him to stay and improve with us to a point where we can get £25M for him. But until then, you can ask any high figure you want, but I don't think anyone is buying it.

I don't disagree with why you are doing it, I just don't think it is realistic.

16 Mar 2026 14:10:54
Sorry, £15M; it will be more than £15. 🙈

16 Mar 2026 14:19:32
Angus, we should've got £30m for Bassey imo, but we didn't.

For Manny's valuation, his ability at set pieces, both defence and attack, will add millions to his price tag. In fact, realistically, that's what is catching everyone's attention.

I'd agree he's probably worth £15m, mate; that's exactly the figure I'd pick if I'm being honest, but I'd be asking £20 as we don't want to sell him.

I'd have that rising if fair targets are met, and of course 10% and not 20 because of the high price tag.

I think if someone wants him, that's what they need to pay for me. But correct, he'll be valued at £15m with 20% sell on.

16 Mar 2026 14:55:16
Stevie, we agree here. I just think he needs a bit more development before he gets to that value. However, I do agree, if someone comes in, we can ask for it; I just don't think we would get it. I think the club will be getting what they can for him with the best add on they can as well.


tbh not entirely sure how the whole process works from start to finish, but I think/hope we do as you say and set an 'unrealistic' price to put us in a position of strength. The risk with that is it scares clubs off.

16 Mar 2026 18:58:45
Angus, I just feel with the amount of departures due this summer in defence, we need some stability, and one more season would probably help him excel, too.

We could sell him for £15m and sign Djiga for £7/8m.

17 Mar 2026 08:11:12
Stevie, I agree, and why I think we re-signed John Souttar to provide that stability.
Manny isn't near reaching his potential yet and has a long way to go, and I think staying with us would help him develop further and make us more profit.

I like, and have always liked, Djiga, and hope we would sign him; not sure at that price, though.

Does a relegated Wolves manage to hold the cards and ask that price, though? Better to cut their losses and sell them for 4/5M. Just my thoughts and no insight, really.

17 Mar 2026 14:44:22
He's just signed a contract. Would need to take Bassey money to sell him. Remember there's no need to undervalue our players now for cash. If teams want our players, then it's premium price. Can't see Cavanagh selling anyone on the cheap unless we want them gone.

15 Mar 2026 14:03:22
Absolutely terrible. And once again we are yet to see a Danny Rohl Rangers team control the midfield.

I watched Motherwell dominating Celtic at Parkhead yesterday in the 1st half. Had them chasing shadows for long periods of the half and created a few chances. Appreciate they made a few individual errors which cost them. But when they play, they are playing 2 or 3 passes in front of the actual pass.

Whereas, we have absolutely no system. Every time a player gets the ball he does the obvious thing. Look up and see who's available.

It's far too predictable and tbh It's not good enough.

Against one of the worst teams in the league, we scraped a win, against the bottom side we scraped a draw. That's not title winning performances.

And one of the biggest concerns into the Rohl project is he still doesn't know his best team and the roles in which those players are used. Appreciate the 3 points but it's very alarming.

15 Mar 2026 14:31:27
And yet, the Motherwell team, when pressed by Celtic, couldn't play through that press. That is why the individual errors happened, and why the goals were scored against them. Surely you would expect a manager of Askou's class to have identified that really early, and told them to play long to break the press. Or perhaps trying to get players who don't have the ability to play that style is what goes against them sometimes when that pressing happens.

Celtic showed us how to beat Motherwell now by pressing high, as they couldn't break that press.

Also, Motherwell may have done okay in stages, but their having Celtic chasing shadows created just 3 shots on target for them, so no end product. And that was before the sending off. Celtic also hit woodwork twice. Results will win the league, not pretty football, although I would want more of that.
Amazing how 2 people see a different game. 🤷

15 Mar 2026 15:58:40
Angus, the awning off killed them yesterday or they would have got points off them.

Why do you always praise our players but if someone praises another team then you criticise them?
It's very strange you have never a good word to say about mwell.
But even when we are rotten you praise us.

15 Mar 2026 16:28:56
Zikos, we controlled midfield last week v Celtic for 120 mins and still lost.

15 Mar 2026 16:38:13
Storm, this is a weekly event now though, and it is being done to criticise Rohl and praise Askou. They are a team who play nice football, but there can be little end product. They are also a team who are 7 points behind us, and have only 1 less draw. So the praise isn't warranted, imo, to the level it is given. If you want to praise a team, then why not Hearts and McInnes, as they are above us. 🤷

I also don't think they would have got points from Celtic if the man hadn't been sent off. Maeda would have scored the header, and it would have been 2-1, as Celtic had managed to work out the press to get the ball back quickly. So Motherwell may have had possession, but they don't hurt teams with that possession and win, especially against the top 6 (12 from 36 points).

The 1-1 draw against us is another example of it.

I praise us and our players because Rangers are the team I support, and I want the best for us even when we are poor. Do you really see that as strange?

You don't see that the poster only praises Motherwell and their manager. I think both of those are strange. I say they play good football, but can also see the lack of end product. As an example, they had more possession yesterday than Celtic, but had 3 shots on target. That was before the sending off, btw.

So why do you always criticise my posts? Does the fact I support the team, even when they are poor or playing badly, annoy you somehow? As I say, strange. 🤷

15 Mar 2026 16:54:40
What I will say is Motherwell don't have a third of the budget we have, and they're not far behind us.
That tells a story in itself.

I think Chermiti may be more expensive than their entire playing squad.
So please do give Motherwell and their manager a bit of credit where it's due.

15 Mar 2026 17:09:04
Angus, I can only presume by your first reply that you don't watch the game. They had Celtic chasing shadows for much of the 1st half and were constantly beating the press with their quick passing and clever movement.

Yes, they lost a goal by not recognising danger and should have sent it long in that instance.



But we won't play as well as Motherwell did in that 1st half in any game from now until the end of the season. We play one dimensional, predictable football.

15 Mar 2026 17:47:00
Zikos, I did watch a bit of it and the highlights. Perhaps the bits I watched were where Celtic were pressing and Motherwell weren't beating the press, their players made mistakes/couldn't cope, and Celtic's first goal came directly from it. the corner for the second came from same press. their third was a GK kick which their CH didn't deal with (sounds like us). btw Motherwell goal came from a Celtic mistake and not good open play; although the press was well executed.

As I said, no point in having lots of possession and having the opposition chasing shadows if it leads to 3 shots on target and a defeat. That is possession for the sake of it. we were being criticised for it not that long ago. we may be poor today but we got it over the line and won 3 points. is that not a sign of champions on here?

We have played well in games, Hearts and Celtic being a couple in recent memory.

we may even win the league and I am sure no fan will care what performances were like if that happens.

our football one dimensional or not is enough to have us above Motherwell and in a 3 way battle for the title. we may fall short but we have still got to this point after a dreadful start to the league.

so Rohl needs more time and Askou isn't the answer imo. and budget has some bearing on league position but we don't accept being behind Celtic with our lower turnover/budget so the argument runs both ways.
So I will continue to support Rangers through good and bad. feel free to look across the fence at Motherwell if you choose to and covet their manager.

15 Mar 2026 18:46:45
Angus, when comparing us with Motherwell it's not fair unless you compare resources. And ours blow theirs out the water. And yet they play better football than us, and we're only a few points ahead of them.

If JBA had our squad, they would be out of sight in my opinion.

15 Mar 2026 20:12:37
Zikos, I expect Rangers to win leagues despite Celtic having a £55-60M advantage over us in budget. That difference this season has equated to 1 point.

They are 7 points behind btw with 1 less draw than ours. They play prettier football but the results aren't coming despite that. Also they have lots of possession but don't create much.
53% yesterday and 3 shots on target.
54% against us in December and 5 shots on target (we won 1-0).
In February they had 64% against us and 6 on target (we had 4 with our 36%). They had to rely on a mistake 3 minutes from the end.
So pretty football without end product wouldn't go down well with our fans.



So you have your opinion that with our (poor? ) squad he would be miles ahead but I don't see any evidence other than we would have more possession. Oh, and our poor manager (according to you) has managed to beat their total by 8 points since Rohl took over. Martin had 12 and Askou had 13 at that time. That is why Well fans wanted him gone.

So use the resource argument all you want but the evidence shows he isn't managing results against all the others in the league so not just comparing him against us.

He has done a good job but not one that would make me want to swap him for Rohl.

16 Mar 2026 15:21:24
100% Angus.

15 Mar 2026 13:05:01
Chermiti is back to being a useless lump again. Absolute sitter again. Hope this gets me a slagging off after 2nd half.

15 Mar 2026 15:26:09
Kaiser, he should have scored, no doubt. But the recovery tackle was very good. We should have had a corner from it. Not defending the miss, as I say, but as an ex-defender, I like to see that last ditch challenge.