26 Jun 2024 18:31:28
Aberdeen have refused rangers offer of 500k for Barron.
26 Jun 2024 18:45:23
Well that’s a surprise then.
26 Jun 2024 18:49:44
Absolute joke btw, how much are they expecting for an OOC player. Just because it’s rangers.
26 Jun 2024 18:52:17
Yesterday.
26 Jun 2024 19:00:53
He’s already been unveiled by Rangers. Photo shoot done at training complex with top on and scarf raised above his head.
26 Jun 2024 19:27:06
Rfc that's what they'd get from abroad so why not expect more from us if it's the rules? We do the same getting players for cheaper than within their own country.
26 Jun 2024 19:28:36
500k is the minimum we would have to pay for development fee? Aberdeen will take it to tribunal and push for as much as they can get.
We would do the same.
26 Jun 2024 19:30:19
We still need to pay compensation for him.
26 Jun 2024 19:40:54
For those who don’t understand, it doesn’t matter if he is out of contact or if he as been unveiled as a rangers player. He is an out of contract player who came through their academy. Therefore can take us to a tribunal for a development fee. Use Dominic solanke’s transfer from Chelsea to Liverpool as the best example.
26 Jun 2024 19:42:02
Diomande yes he's signed. But aberdeen are due compensation. I always thought max was 525k?
26 Jun 2024 20:07:04
Can’t imagine development costs would be anywhere near £500k. So we go to tribunal.
26 Jun 2024 20:18:57
This was in the papers a few days ago have they refused the same amount again?
26 Jun 2024 20:19:06
Thats very charitable of them. Did they say what to do with it, Bernardos or something.
26 Jun 2024 20:23:26
Diomande, yes he's a gers player, but we still need to pay for a youth player.
26 Jun 2024 20:26:41
He has diomande, but we haven't agreed a price yet.
26 Jun 2024 20:38:12
Sorry no. 1 claimed he's not signed merely talking about the fee Aberdeen have refused.
26 Jun 2024 21:31:25
They did refuse this a few days ago though so nothing new TBF it's going to a tribunal.
26 Jun 2024 21:33:11
This is a load of bull, what other job pays the previous employer when someone's contract runs out, once the contract runs out regardless of age that should be the end of their employment and whoever they sign for is their next employer!
26 jun 2024 21:34:08
a player from chelsea to liverpool is the best example eh, no scottish examples that would be the best then?
26 Jun 2024 21:38:34
Aberdeen are wanting sell on clauses and add ons ? they can get to F##k I honestly don’t see them getting even the 500k I think he has also played over 60 times for Aberdeen so they have had a return on there investment as well I honestly think they will get 350k at tribunal there is no chance Aberdeen have spent 500k developing Barron.
27 jun 2024 05:30:16
they don't have to have soent 500k developing the boy fgs
maryhill, dems de rules, fir all clubs, , like charlie telfer to dundee utd, we were compensated more than the dev fee at tribunal, they don't change the rules unless all clubs agree.
27 Jun 2024 05:46:30
They are not entitled to any sell on percentage whatsoever, dev fee and that's it.
27 Jun 2024 09:06:12
Ignore previous, didn't know about the 5% thing.