Rangers Rumours Member Posts


fintytint's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded

No Profile Picture uploaded


Where from:

Favourite player:

Best team moment:



fintytint's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To fintytint's Posts



To fintytint's last 5 rumours posts


To fintytint's last 5 banter posts


To fintytint's last 5 rumour replies


To fintytint's last 5 banter replies


fintytint's rumours posts with other poster's replies to fintytint's rumours posts


20 Feb 2020 22:43:19
Amazing. Just amazing. What a game and did we actually see a plan B?


1.) 20 Feb 2020 22:56:27
I've said it b4 and will say it again, wee Hagi is an absolute steal if we can get him signed up.
Has done more in a month than some have in a year.
Oh my days, I need to go and lie down after that one.

2.) 21 Feb 2020 07:30:49
agree 72 - the lad looks an absolute superstar.

2 footed, great attitude and goals too, we need to sign him - he’s a proper no. 10, we can build team around.

3.) 21 Feb 2020 08:41:13
I have to say as well, hagi was the game changer also aribo as a LWB looked amazing added a different dimension to the team and can defend.

4.) 21 Feb 2020 09:41:30
Big Joe was just brilliant. Just saying!

5.) 21 Feb 2020 16:19:44
Would love to see us try 343 in a game. Think our players would thrive in that formation. Aribo was surprisingly good as lwb but barisic is made for it tav is perfect rwb. Would be interesting to see.



28 Jan 2019 10:51:34
That to me (bar worrell for goldson) was our true first team. Defoe and Davis will need to prove they are good enough to claim a spot.


1.) 28 Jan 2019 11:11:47
We lost our edge when kent went off. We need width👍.

2.) 28 Jan 2019 17:40:12
Finty tint Davis and Defoe don't need to prove anything what did arfield do that Davis couldn't do better.

3.) 28 Jan 2019 22:21:52
Momentum, if you have it why disrupt it.

4.) 28 Jan 2019 23:01:15
arfield had a hand in all 3 goals mate

i like davis and think he’ll be good for us, but for now scotty has the jersey.

5.) 28 Jan 2019 23:40:49
davis > arfield. Just me that finds arfield sluggish? Often caught on heels etc and just not a natural 10? Movemenr is laboured at the best of times for me. Davis is the best mf in the league if fit imo.

6.) 29 Jan 2019 01:34:10
We missed Arfield through suspension and injury in November time was it? And I remember we struggled without him. He’s not flashy but he is a link between Morelos and the holding mids. He’s also a hard worker and suits a high press.

He was unreal in the Old Firm game. Won his battles vs Brown.

What’s Davis shown so far to take the jersey off him? Don’t get me wrong I’m delighted to have both players. Strength in depth is key.

7.) 29 Jan 2019 12:48:03
Bear is right on this subject, as an Ulster guy I love wee Davis, but I wouldn’t drop Arfield if the guy is doing his job, Stevie Davis will have to earn his place on the field, and I’ve no doubt he will, he’s a class act.



28 Sep 2018 22:41:03
With regards to the striker situation for semi final. I could personally see him forming a rotating front 3 in a 433. Middleton/ kent/ grezda being my choices as its obvious by gerrards comments that sadiq is not getting on the park anytime soon.


1.) 28 Sep 2018 23:33:10
I like the way you are thinking fintytint 3 rapid and skillful players, I think they would cause havoc.

2.) 29 Sep 2018 11:07:17
Candias has to play.

3.) 29 Sep 2018 17:51:08
Fintyfint, exactly what I said two days ago.

4.) 01 Oct 2018 12:56:00
Candias has shown nothing this season to suggest that. Been poor more often than good.



08 Aug 2018 12:43:53
I think at 6pm tomorrow gerrard will know if he can get anyone else from liverpool ie solanke.


1.) 08 Aug 2018 20:50:27
Fintyint i'd prefer the two Bosnian lads signed instead of loan deals.



02 May 2018 10:18:41
Hate doing this but I was told by someone that seems to be in the know. That yes Gerrard is coming and that King is stepping back to just be on the board and be a shareholder. Investment is coming from USA. No idea who, no idea how much. didn't have much time to speak to the guy. He did say its expected to all be done within the next 2 weeks so am assuming end of season. Just passing on.


1.) 02 May 2018 10:35:25
We all have our own assumptions of King but he is a very astute and competent businessman. Can't help but think there is shrewd reason as to why he's missed the share deadline and is there a bigger picture regarding what you have mentioned.

2.) 02 May 2018 10:49:16
Letting himself be dragged through the courts in SA for years due to his tax dodging wasn't very astute. And his dealings with the Takeover Panel haven't been very competent have they?

3.) 02 May 2018 11:21:44
We've met to have huge investment for the for the past 2year n still waiting lol

4.) 02 May 2018 17:59:45
And an astute business man would have money king has stood up in a court of law and says he has none. So he's either skint or a conman. No room for either at our club in my eyes

5.) 02 May 2018 19:56:01
What do we all think will happen if big investment is made in our club? That the investors are just putting money in because they have a few quid spare in the bank and won't miss it? If the stated 25-30mil investment is coming what is it going to be brokered against. That is my only concern. An for that matter i'm sure that 30mil wouldn't be far off what would be needed to buy our club at this point in time. i'm not buying into this whole situation.




fintytint's banter posts with other poster's replies to fintytint's banter posts


09 May 2020 21:51:55
I have changed my view on the dossier after reading more into it rather than relying on what i’am to believe it really says. I firmly think a full investigation is needed. Listen if I was accused of anything in my business and I knew I had done nothing at all wrong I would welcome an investigation to prove it.

If I knew I had done something wrong I would be doing my best to hide it. The worst thing they have done might not even be in our dossier. That’s the point of the investigation, but we have proven enough to merit one.

We just need other teams to show there hand. We need other teams who people thought were against a investigation to say ‘you know what this needs to be investigated further’ personally I don’t think we will get the votes need though which is a shame.


1.) 09 May 2020 22:23:15
Truth to Power badly needed now for the good off the game. All self respecting clubs should step forward.

2.) 10 May 2020 02:39:14
Where did you get your copy of the dossier to read fully into it and where can I get one then!

3.) 10 May 2020 08:19:42
What about Michael Stewert claiming it’s our fault that league reconstruction is a non starter. How these muppets are allowed to continually get away with this baffles me.

4.) 10 May 2020 09:42:47
That's funny because I'm led to believe it was Aberdeen, Ross County, ST Mirren, St Johnstone, Hibs and Scumdee Utd who voted against it!

5.) 10 May 2020 10:28:57
Michael Stewart is a complete idiot . basically he is saying that Rangers have kiboshed league reconstruction, he has said that if Rangers hadnt complained about the SPFL decision and asked for an enquiry then everyone would have been happy with the SPFL and would have voted for league reconstruction? So much for democracy and sporting integrity. over to you Mr Stewart!

6.) 10 May 2020 13:22:56
It is unfair that Hearts are going down but one of the pluses is that it's winding Michael Stewart so much. Glorious to think of his meltdown. He's making even less sense than he normally does.

7.) 10 May 2020 15:44:09
Michael Stewart should be sacked for false claims. how can he say it’s Rangers fault given all the self serving clubs in the Premiership voting reconstruction down. He should be concentrating on John Nelms of Dundee for causing it all with his bribed flip on vote. It’s scary that the media have dropped this and concentrate on the Rangers. Stewart is a nobody and a nodding dog for the BBC. same old same old. it’s Rangers fault. what a diddy.

8.) 10 May 2020 17:10:29
Fintytint, the spfl, (sfa) better have there house in order, because if they knock us back for inquiry we will take it further, so i'm not too concerned of them knocking us back, but I've been looking about online, it would not surprise me if the inquiry was voted for, as now that league reconstructions been kicked to the moon, the others are starting to see for themself promises made, but never honoured. Time for change.

9.) 10 May 2020 17:32:42
Why would the clubs want to pay a 6 figure sum to an Independent Investigation to be told the same result as the first one?
It’s like going to the game and watching your club get beat and then going home to watch it again on the television. It is still going to be the same result.
Your club and it’s supporters are just going round in circles.

10.) 10 May 2020 18:05:29
we are getting the blame for the collapse of league construction now. I hope Mr Park didn't stand on the grassy knoll in Dallas in 1963.

11.) 10 May 2020 18:16:20
Jetmayfair, that's the problem mate, this spfl and sfa, have run scottish football since 2012, without anybody from football qustioning there. Motives, now questions are being asked, the cats got their tongues.

12.) 10 May 2020 22:04:27
Buzz, we've offered to pay for inquiry, so no reason for it not to go ahead, mr park offered to pay for it, you should have known that, as your always telling us you know our history, also i noticed a few of your lot, yourself included on our celtic posts page. laughing and trying to slag us, where are they all now, no doubt mass eh. mate.



16 Apr 2020 00:14:00
Trying to look at this through glasses that are not tinted.
I fully understand the situation for clubs needing money.
I fully understand that chairmen will have different views about that resolution and feel that they were not bullied into a vote.

My stance was in no way at all and i mean this wholeheartedly, I do not want a null and void season. I understand the reasons some people wanted it. But for me I would rather lose or win a league through the course of the full fixtures not any other way. Imagine we were ahead. Would you honestly want to break there rein being told Rangers were gifted the title.

Am not saying we will catch them. I am saying what a sensible rangers fan thinks. 'there was always a chance'. The points difference looks good for them at the moment but could easily drop to a 4 point gap. There are so so so many ways this season can be finished. Delay is not a problem, as it doesn't have to finish so next season can start on the correct date.

It can be gradual over the next 3-4 seasons eating into each of them. Whoever wins the league or drops down deserves the full fixture list to prove that was where they should be. If they are given the title it would be a terrible feeling. The obvious corruption that is going on behind the scenes is clear to anyone who is willing to look at the facts. Unfortunately I think decisions on this league will be made well before any investigation happens or evidence is shown.

I'am a born ranger, I will follow my club. I will stand by my club. I just hope that the truth comes out about the SPFL and whenever we start playing football again it will finally be on a level playing field.
Everyong hates us. ( although caley, partick and hearts can tolerate us) :D.


1.) 16 Apr 2020 08:46:27
I've never been obsessive like the ANTHILL MOB, but i also back my club in getting to the bottom of this possible corrupt doings within the beaks that are an apology, at running our game in scotland! On league reconstruction, we shouldn't be in any doubt that the scottish premiership will be a 14 team league for season 2020/ 2021, whenever that gets up and running. The 14 team league will most likely be for one season only!

2.) 16 Apr 2020 10:47:02
so, heads down and don't bother about the corruption assailing your club at every turn. the ostrich method. ok

3.) 16 Apr 2020 11:15:17
SGL, Celtic have signed the biggest deal for a kit supplier in Scottish football history with Adidas. ( your favoured option ) .

Celtic and Liverpool had major issues with NB which resulted in their British relations manager getting the sack. Your board are used to bedlam anyway.
Your source who is friendly with Graeme Park is taking you for a mug and that is why he is winding you up with different information about kit suppliers. 😂.

4.) 16 Apr 2020 12:19:02
BuzzBUM, what a fool🤪🤪🤪🇬🇧🤮.

5.) 16 Apr 2020 12:19:18
Ok buzz bomb, let's have a wager on this and the loser gives the money to the winners charity, how about it? let's get a few things straight first and as well as being daft, your obviously blind. I never said a source of mine who's friendly with graeme park told me this! I also never stated that adidas was my choice of kit manufacturers either!
Nike would be my preferred choice as their the biggest sportswear firm on the planet, bar none, FACT! Now your slagging new balance which you previously heaped praise on, because you know i've got you and that new balance are the new kit manufacturers of the famous glasgow rangers, FACT! So let's strike this bet motormouth or forever hold your peace! 🤫🤭.

6.) 16 Apr 2020 12:22:50
I know the NB Account Manager. A good guy. I also know Celtic had major issues in the latter stages with NB. Can’t comment on Liverpool but wouldn’t be surprised if it was a similar situation albeit on a different level.

7.) 16 Apr 2020 12:25:05
What's your post got to do with sgl post above buzzbomb?

8.) 16 Apr 2020 13:03:10
I will have to decline your offer to bet. Macron being announced your new kit suppliers will be good enough for me. 😂

I remember 6 months ago you mentioned NB would be your new kit suppliers and you also mentioned that your source was friendly with Graeme Park. Am I right or wrong?

9.) 16 Apr 2020 13:32:35
SGL. I think the obsession BB has regards to Rangers is unbelievable. The only way to get him or her to stop posting is don't reply to any, 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇦🇺😎⚽️👍.

10.) 16 Apr 2020 14:43:01
Ibrox4Me answer me this pal. From your sources at new balance am i correct in stating that new balance will be our new kit manufacturers or who is it in your opinion with your info mate? Has your friend told you that new balance are in to replace hummel as rangers new kit manufacturers?

11.) 16 Apr 2020 15:15:02
Cunny u r right, don’t engage with them.

12.) 16 Apr 2020 15:41:43
S.g.l., brilliant mate, i never thought of offering the wee fud a bet, its the easiest way to get rid of dafties like buzz bomb, offer him a wager and he disappears, good on you sgl, getting rid of people like him is great, all his like do, is try to bring people down, probably glad he is off school.

13.) 16 Apr 2020 15:45:17
cunny in oz go a bit further and blow out as well anyone who answers his posts, i will start the ball rolling by starting this off.

14.) 16 Apr 2020 16:32:34
Had to decline the bet because he's under age. 😂😂.

15.) 16 Apr 2020 17:12:08
yes like his mate brihboy, lost one bet and he has disappeared, wonder where he has gone.

16.) 16 Apr 2020 18:41:03
SGL, he was one of the senior guys in the UK with NB and was the lead on the Celtic and Liverpool accounts. I’ve spent time with him in the box at Anfield on a few occasions. The relationship with Celtic got into a lot of trouble and he and his team were given the chop. Not for anything they’d done wrong as personal relations were excellent. Management at NB were the issue. He’s very well connected but has no knowledge of any dealing with Rangers.



14 Apr 2020 14:19:05
In no way do I wish for ANY club to go under. But what I see from our governing body is a trick to put clubs into that position. An organisation put in place to protect has turned into an organisation of corruption and lies.
First, Ann Budges statement. Very clear and to the point. Her point on why the rangers resolution was refused is shocking. The word 'instructed' was used and should have been 'requested' well then inform rangers of that. don't tell the championship clubs it has not passed then let us and hearts find out from them.
Second, The ability for one club to retract its vote ( that is my third point) . In such an important system/ resolution as this, your vote must stand. It doesn't matter if a lovely friendly offer comes in after your vote. Your vote was cast, end of.
Third, in the resolution a club who votes in FAVOUR of the resolution can not retract there vote. Remember in favour. However it does not have the same for a club that votes against it. So this allows for conversations between organisations and clubs to discuss said vote.
fourth, It is not illegal to offer incentives to a voter from other voters. It is illegal to offer money, but there are many ways around this. I have been in a situation myself with a very well known business that requested me to take the value of any golf outings calendars, gifts to the company and instead pay the money into the businesses account. scary but legal It is however illegal for a governing body to off any sort of incentives.
Fifth, So we come to the nitty, gritty. Hearts, ICT, St Mirren and us retract our votes as it in no ways says an us being a no vote that we cant. We hold them to ransom as they have held us. We wait the 28 days to vote. We can play there game. If they refuse us to retract our votes we refuse to accept that dundees vote could be retracted.


1.) 14 Apr 2020 14:39:16
Really like that last one finty . only it won’t be st Mirren they are happy . it would poss be Partick and Falkirk. But definitely a good strategy. unless we can hit them with an interdict immediately.

2.) 14 Apr 2020 15:47:10
Partick Thistle QC David Thomson’s legal opinion on the SPFL’s handling of their resolution makes for interesting reading. All 13 pages are available online. Hope the evidence we have is compelling and we can apply further pressure.

3.) 14 Apr 2020 16:39:07
Good post Finty, but either us or Hearts retracting our votes wouldn’t impact the Premiership vote. However, your shout about Thistle might be worth a shout.

4.) 14 Apr 2020 22:03:51
It wouldn’t hewho but it would mean they could not proceed for three weeks or until UEFA make their decision end of April.



14 Apr 2020 14:00:57
Pesonally in no way do I want ANY team to fold. So this farcical resolution is just that. An intention to force a hand of any clubs in financial problems. My take on this is an organisation put in to protect clubs using the virus to hold clubs to ransom. We are hearing clubs chairmans are not happy at all with the resolution but there hands are forced due to the money.
First Ann Budges statement. for her to tell us that the rangers resolution was dropped due to the fact the word 'instructed' was used unstead of 'requested' is a disgrace.
second, the ability of a club to vote then retract the vote. Now unless it states in the contract that you can you then retract the vote at a later date within the 28 days then fine ( that will be my third point)




13 Mar 2020 10:46:03
With the postponement now in place I can't see how any of the european cups can finish. Each country has acted in different ways to contain the virus. So no agreement i can see could be put in place to continue.





fintytint's rumour replies


Click To View This Thread

26 Jul 2020 14:52:23
And where is the money going to come from. We continually release players or let there contracts run out. We need to sell players to be able to release funds.




Click To View This Thread

27 Feb 2020 08:58:11
How many times. Nothing happened in Dubai!




Click To View This Thread

03 Feb 2020 12:09:30
Personally I didn't see the point in Dubai. We have an amazing training ground already and we should have had a friendly against lower opposition to prepare us. It seemed like a pointless exercise.




Click To View This Thread

28 Oct 2019 10:15:06
So that 3 is one more than your limit is it? Not defending him on missing as I think the reins of penalty taker should be handed to someone else. Gerrard unknowingly created this elephant in the room by handing Tav the captaincy as he seems to feel like he can't drop his captain, if that was the LB which he has proven many times since his tenure he would drop him in a second. His crossing has become poor and was highlighted nothing more than when we got the goal on sunday and Tom Miller said umpteen times that cross was from tav, that assist was from tav. He has struggled beating the first man with his crosses this season and when you look down the left side BB is firing in pin point crosses, maybe tav should be cutting in a lot more than trying to cross the ball. I don't know. SG is the manager and he picks the team, personally I expected a little lie of 'tav is showing signs of tiredness and we decided to drop him, or tav has a tight muscle and didn't want to risk playing him on sunday' just to deflect the reason he was dropped. Its hard, he IS the captain but on the other hand he is struggling and I think a week out could do him the world of good. As ave said before I think SG used permanent marker when he wrote tav and goldsons names on the board at the start of the season. It is what it is really no matter who SG picks, he picks for a reason we have cheered on far far worse players than tav.
Carrot and the stick, some boys need a good shouting at and shake and others an arm round the shoulder.
I will be cheering him on as he wears our top, has the armband and is our player.




Click To View This Thread

11 Oct 2019 09:51:11
Just need to wait for the book!





fintytint's banter replies


Click To View This Thread

25 Jul 2020 16:08:20
Edu Vs Celtic.




Click To View This Thread

25 Jul 2020 15:12:22
It's still advertised as 15:15. That's when I thought it was an seeing Motherwell game on premier I though it was cancelled or delayed. But seems like it is 17:15.




Click To View This Thread

24 Jul 2020 18:13:50
It's just a report handed to SFA to see that all players came back negative. Don't let 'them' twist the facts.




Click To View This Thread

24 Jul 2020 18:12:10
That's the bit I don't understand. If a team get a test of 9 players say positive that morning and can't play. Are those games rearranged? Are a team awarded points? I know us and some of the other bigger clubs have a large pool of players. But what if a team is short? I really don't think the spfl or SFA have thought this through.




Click To View This Thread

29 Apr 2020 16:14:28
They knew fine well how Dundee were going to vote from the start and spfl had that vote in there hand. So you make a strange 'it went missing' statement then a 'dont accept out vote' reply.

They cry its a democracy. What democracy allows someone to vote after the votes have supposed to be have been finished but there vote would be the casting vote? My 9 year old would do a better job at hiding the corruption than the SPFL have shown in this 'democratic' vote.