Rangers Banter 2

16 Feb 2026 08:47:43
Fair play to all the guys who came on to say they got it wrong about Chermiti after yesterday. Silence from a lot of others says it all. I've liked his work ethic and fight under Danny and hope the young lad can keep adding the goals. i'd say if he can get to 12-15, thst would be a good return

16 Feb 2026 09:41:35
I was definitely a Chermiti critic throughout the season, mainly due to his lack of goals, but it's hard to fault his work rate and commitment to keep going.

What I noticed last night is that he flourished with another striker up top supporting him. This is how we need to play going forward, with Naderi and Chermiti bullying defences.

16 Feb 2026 09:55:04
Yip, yesterday I got it way wrong and the lad had an outstanding game. On that basis, thank God Danny Rohl picks the team.

However, out of all the games he's played this season, there have only been two standouts. As an 8.5m player, he must be showing these performances week in, week out.



Before anyone starts having a pop at those who have been rightly critical, let's see if he kicks on this time. He never did after beating the Tims at the midden, which was 12 games ago.

16 Feb 2026 09:59:19
I've always said there were bigger issues in the side than him. Yes, we need a striker to score goals, but the predicament we have been in is we don't have a goalscorer. Let's hope Naderi can get us goals. Miovski doesn't score many goals either, and adds far less to our play than Chermiti.
Still, I worry about our center backs and the blend in the middle of the park. Rohl seems to want the midfielders to be fluid in terms of who presses when, and for me it leaves big gaps.


We need to press the space better as a unit. When we're out of possession we still have one or two pressing and others not closing off behind, allowing teams to knock it around us.
Souttar has been guilty for a while of losing concentration. He's been caught on his heels a few times. CBs need to read the game and be proactive to cut the ball out; the minute you're being reactive as a CB, the striker has beaten you to the ball.

16 Feb 2026 10:10:30
Bazbear, Chermiti is definitely talented, and if he becomes a regular/consistent goalscorer, we could well have a very special striker on our hands. 🤔 We'll make big money when we eventually sell Chermiti, imo. 🤔 🇬🇧 His footwork and skill levels are superb. 👌

16 Feb 2026 10:25:18
He played well and actually took his chances well, but I still don't think he's a no9 who will score the amount of goals needed.

16 Feb 2026 10:26:19
People forget he's still on 21. Actually, I saw a comment yesterday on a Rangers fans' Facebook page that Rohl should be sacked for selecting Chermiti.

16 Feb 2026 10:27:54
Hat trick yesterday, but for me, he should be scoring more than he does. He's proved, with his goals from yesterday and the 2 against that mob, that he can do it. He just doesn't do it enough, imo, to win a league; you need your main striker scoring consistently.

16 Feb 2026 10:54:31
Chermiti has played well in at least half a dozen games, not only a couple, Sunshine. He made a massive difference in a couple of games, yes, mate.

16 Feb 2026 10:56:32
I was one who admitted I could be wrong, but I still have to say two games does not make him good enough. Still a lot to prove, but I think the main takeaway is we should remember he's only 21. We sometimes forget, with his time at Everton, that he's still very young and learning.

16 Feb 2026 11:03:20
Consistency is the key. I hope he can start to build some off the back of what was an outstanding (absolutely outstanding) performance yesterday. More like that and we'll be in a good place. I just hope he's not a one game in six type of player.

Rohl certainly seemed to play to his strengths yesterday. I love the proper crosses into the box, it's exactly what we should be doing with 2 * 6.4ft strikers on the park.

16 Feb 2026 11:15:39
Only seen bits of the game as I was at a christening, but let's not go overboard like we did against Celtic. The boy needs to do it week in, week out, not over two games. 👌

16 Feb 2026 11:16:52
Good post, SS. It's embarrassing, the told-you-so posts from some on here. The boy has had two good games this season. I'll save my humble pie until he does it a bit more often.

16 Feb 2026 11:38:42
We just need to accept that the boy is 21 and works his backside off regardless if he has a good game or not. He definitely looks as if he will benefit playing with a partner up front, and on the days he is up alone will need more encouragement and support.



He's been frustrating at times, but he's the one player in that team that needs backing by the fans more than anyone else. We can be an impatient bunch, but with Rohl guiding this group, anything is possible.

16 Feb 2026 11:42:54
Chermiti has had two good games that reflect the price we paid since he has been here. He has a lot more to prove and consistency to show before anyone can say that they got it wrong.

16 Feb 2026 11:47:47
Chermiti had a good game yesterday, but I will hold judgement on him until he starts scoring consistently. He has turned it on in only two games all season, which is not enough contribution from your striker. Let's see how he plays next time against Livy.

16 Feb 2026 12:02:36
No-one is saying that posters can't criticise, but surely everyone can see the difference between criticism and calling one of our players (or was it two) dug meat.
He has played well in games after the Celtic match. However, unless he is scoring, people don't acknowledge that good play.

Last year it was Dessers; he didn't score in big games. Now we have a player who does that, but he doesn't score enough.
It will be interesting to see that, if we do win the league (which is still a big if, imo), how we managed that without our main striker scoring.

16 Feb 2026 12:03:45
Folk who have never seen his ability are clearly wrong.

16 Feb 2026 12:16:06
On Tuur, I presume you cast your judgement on someone having a good game based on whether they score or not? I've seen Chermiti having more than two good games. I agree he needs more consistency in terms of scoring goals, but to say he's only had two good games is a bit harsh.

16 Feb 2026 12:38:31
He missed a sitter against Motherwell, which is the difference between us being joint top and 2 points behind.

16 Feb 2026 12:48:30
A Rangers review says he is 4th in the league for goals per 90. 0.55 goals per 90 mins. Only Nygran, Maswanise, and Jules are ahead of him.

If he does become a 1 in 2 striker, with his other attributes, he will be some player.

16 Feb 2026 12:53:27
What's embarrassing is thinking the boy decided he should be sold for that amount, and people thinking a 21 year old who's not played that many games really is 'dug meat' when there's obvious talent there. He may not score 20 goals a season, but he contributes, and the manager, back room staff, and squad clearly see his attributes.

He's also played more than 2 good games. Nobody is saying 'I told you so'. I'm just reminding people that if you're going to make outrageous criticism, it can bite you back sometimes.

16 Feb 2026 14:00:49
Tommy, he's 1 in 2. He's not going to be a Rangers player, mate.

16 Feb 2026 14:28:35
MPH, you can't attribute those 2 lost points just to one player. What about the defender (Sterling) who didn't win the ball at the back post for their goal? What about the player who didn't stop the cross? What about the player who wasn't close to the scorer, Walsh? By the way, not blaming any of them for the draw, as no player is perfect.



But Chermiti also scored 3 goals last night, which is the difference between being 2 points behind and 5; or is there a difference in the psychology there?

It is a team game, and it isn't as simple as blaming one player people don't rate as being the issue.

16 Feb 2026 15:17:48
Baz, I have never said he is dug meat. I did say he was improving, but he needs to score goals.

Angus, he is a striker, and he needs goals, so that's why people are criticising him. Dessers is irrelevant now, so I don't know why you're being that backup, and he did score in big games also, so that's a lie.



Mph is 100% correct. Motherwell was a big game, and he missed a sitter, or we would be sitting pretty right now.

He needs to go on a goal-scoring run till the end of the season, and shoot us to the title.

16 Feb 2026 20:25:47
Strikers miss chances, Storm, every one of them. I'll take a point away to Motherwell alongside a win against Celtic at Parkhead, and yesterday's win over the leaders. Both of which Chermiti played a major part in. Not sure if I said it was you who called him Dugmeat.

15 Feb 2026
New image uploaded to the
Rangers Player Sightings page entitled,

Click picture for larger image

15 Feb 2026 23:20:45.
Pick a stat, dude. They are all the exact same. Why I have taken the opinion I have. I see it with my own eyes, and the numbers are consistent.

That referee today is particularly bad. Every time he refs at Ibrox, he looks like he is trying to break a record. He was close today, equalling his best of 17 freekicks against us.

15 Feb 2026 23:21:08
Means nothing, mate. They might be fair, give or take a few.

By the above table, if there is a conspiracy, then the refs must favour Hibs and Motherwell too.

Also, Hearts in 6th place managed to top the league despite the conspiracy against everyone but Celtic.

15 Feb 2026 23:23:43
Wow, that is staggering. Seventeen minutes difference between all the rest of the league, so all roughly the same, and Celtic have an extra hour on top of that?

16 Feb 2026 00:49:18
Put a different way, Celtic get 8 minutes per game extra, while the rest of the league are between 4.8 and 5.1 minutes.

Celtic have taken 15 points in extra time this season. 9 of those points came in the 95th minute or later.

16 Feb 2026 01:14:16
Kind of missing the point re Hearts. Maybe they haven't needed to score late on in a lot of the matches.

16 Feb 2026 01:24:48
Surely Celtic don't have an hour more in 26 games than we do in 27?

That would be an avg of 2:30 more per game than us. Not a chance.

16 Feb 2026 02:25:26
Oh my dog.

1 hour more plus 1 red card in nearly 2 years.

Who would have thought it?

Everyone that is fair-minded, that's who.

16 Feb 2026 07:16:54
My God, we sound like them. It's actually embarrassing, seriously. 10 subs, that's 30 seconds each, so that's 5 minutes. Thomson and Jukes were also injured, that time added. Also, let's not be like them, please.

16 Feb 2026 07:29:05
Exactly, Ryan. Has our support turned into them? Embarrassing.

16 Feb 2026 07:49:03
So the time added on is only for Celtic and not for the team they are playing then? Absolute paranoid nonsense.

16 Feb 2026 07:49:51
My research shows that East End Mob coaches spend longer treating injuries than all other clubs.

16 Feb 2026 07:57:34
Ryan and John, fair point regarding yesterday, but over the course of the season it is clear, for some reason, conspiracy or not, their games are being refereed differently. Given football games last the same amount of time, and are all susceptible to injuries and subs, u would expect there to be little difference across the table. That is proved by the very small differences among all other 11 teams.

To have one team stand out with such an enormous gap from the rest at least raises eyebrows. Perhaps it's the high-profile TV games or media scrutiny that means refs give more time to them than all others; I don't know, but there's no logical reason one team should play that much more over a season than anyone else. And, they have been able to take advantage of the opportunity given them.

16 Feb 2026 08:05:50
Ryan, it's 30 seconds per stop of play, not per sub. So, the ten subs didn't happen at separate times, and three happened at half time, which wouldn't count as the game was already stopped.

16 Feb 2026 08:46:33
I'd be more concerned about the Kilmarnock defender, who didn't even attempt to play the ball clear, resulting in a corner kick for them near the death.

16 Feb 2026 08:57:32
Ryan, Celtic made 3 subs at half time, can't add time on for that.

16 Feb 2026 09:08:53
I get your point about yesterday, Ryan, but that's a one-off occasion.
But the stats suggest that's happening every game for them, but no one else in the league. 🤔
To merely point out such a huge statistical difference isn't turning on them, as you have suggested.

16 Feb 2026 09:13:44
Laudrup, not sure where u found this, but it would be interesting to know if there are similar outstanding disparities in other leagues. Perhaps one for the stats guys on here for comparison?

16 Feb 2026 09:30:50
Even paranoids can have enemies. Paranoid or not, bouncy, that still gives no explanation as to why one team is playing far more than any other team in the league. Calling folk paranoid or embarrassing doesn't actually answer the question.

Unlike other conspiracies, which can be argued, like attacking teams get more pens or offsides, etc. etc., there's no logic behind added time being consistently far more for one team than others.

16 Feb 2026 09:36:24
Let's get our excuses in early. Mb we would score in added time if we did not try to hold on to a point again then, men.

16 Feb 2026 09:55:00
Graeme, if it happens to them, it happens to the team they are playing as well. Both teams have the chance to score in time added on.

16 Feb 2026 10:10:23
I just got sent it and posted it here to the guys saying it's embarrassing. No, it's not. It's just showing a stat. On the other hand, if that was us top of that table, referees' lives wouldn't be worth living, you know that.

16 Feb 2026 10:31:55
Between this and the 'fouls per caution' stat, they are definitely an outlier in both metrics.

Just 2 stats that point towards them being refereed to a different standard.

Can't, for the life of me, understand why the rest of the league doesn't make more of an issue of this.

They all seem quite happy to let it happen.

Now, just imagine these stats pointed favourably to us. All hell would break loose in the media.

16 Feb 2026 10:33:25
John, you wouldn't call it embarrassing if Celtic nicked a 97th-minute draw against us at Ibrox if there should have been less added.

16 Feb 2026 10:49:48
I was looking forward to everybody being happy after a result that I reckon makes us definite favourites for the league, but no, another conspiracy theory.

16 Feb 2026 10:57:22
Celtic score goals in injury time regularly, so clearly more injury time will be added. I don't like praising them in any way, but fighting to the death can only be praised.

16 Feb 2026 11:49:25
So what do we do here? Does anyone want to start a watch and keep track of how many times they or the other team have players being treated, or how long the ref added on due to time wasting?

You need to add context to stats. You can't just say they always get longer, or that added time is extended until they score the winner, without some other facts.

If you can argue that there was no time wasting and have added up all the injury treatment time, and they are still way off the minutes, then maybe, just maybe, you have a point. Until then, these stats mean absolutely nothing.

16 Feb 2026 11:56:30
Not really, JFM, the fitter team with more quality would have an advantage over lesser teams, pretty obvious, mate.

16 Feb 2026 11:58:47
60 minutes seems a lot when viewed this way, however, this is over 26 games, which makes it an extra 2.3 minutes per game versus other teams. It also says this includes half time and full time, so, again, dividing by 2 makes it 1 minute extra per half.

Hardly a "huge" anomaly when broken down per game.

I think it is being raised because Celtic have scored late on in the last few games, as this has never been mentioned before. Sounds like some people are looking for things that are not there.

16 Feb 2026 12:52:14
Mystar, have Celtic scored that many in added time to account for an extra hour of football? Mojo, yes, only because it was pointed out, but the figures are quite staggering. Over a season, all the other clubs are at a similar level of time added, but only one is so far ahead.

It's averaging out at around 3 minutes more than any other team? Conspiracies or not, I still haven't seen any reasonable explanation for it.

16 Feb 2026 13:04:51
It's a valid stat. Not so much that they get so much extra time than Rangers, more that they get so much more time than everybody else; it's not even close. That is the equivalent of more than two extra games they have had over the season. I'm surprised their players aren't doing a Rodri and moaning about it. Taking the bias out of it, I've watched games at Ibrox when there have been 10 subs used and the ref has given 2 or 3 minutes, and it's usually when we are winning by a few.

It's almost like he is showing mercy, or decided there is no point playing on. I think that the QP game recently had no extra time. It doesn't matter, but surely all games should be refereed the same regardless of the score.

16 Feb 2026 13:08:43
Mr Mojo, I agree, mate.

16 Feb 2026 13:08:47
Dado, we would have the same time to score a winner.

16 Feb 2026 13:27:21
Numbers don't lie, guys. As football fans, our eyes can lie. We do tend to see things we want to see.

That does not account for Celtic being several standard deviations from the norm across almost all refereeing statistics, across multiple seasons. That's not a conspiracy. It's statistically anomalous.

16 Feb 2026 13:46:55
Kasier, can't see that, mate.

16 Feb 2026 14:16:37
Should you guys not just be delighted you have won an important game and closed the gap on Hearts!

Celtic scoring in added time just shows how badly we are struggling to put teams away, and does not bode well for the run in.

A few weeks ago it was Celtic never get a red card, now it is minutes added on. Celtic then get a red card after Boyd kept calling it out, maybe after his and Neil McCann's "unbiased" comments yesterday the refs won't add any time on in Celtic games, then it will be something else.

Oh, sorry, forgot about the fouls per booking!

I think it is fair to say the paranoia runs deep on both sides, and will get worse as the league goes on. Every decision will be analysed.

Somehow I can see all the refs in Scotland agreeing to add on more time to allow Celtic to win games they are playing poor in. Here is another way to look at it: maybe they see how bad Celtic are playing in games, and are adding on the time hoping the opposition score!

We can all flip the narrative to suit our agendas!

16 Feb 2026 14:51:39
There's a margin of 17 minutes between the rest of the league, then it jumps to 81 minutes. If that doesn't make u stop and ask why, fair dos, but can certainly understand some asking the question. Nothing embarrassing about that.

16 Feb 2026 15:28:18
Mr Mojo, that's the only thing I'm taking on. They struggle beating clubs at the lower end of the league. I can remember being at a Falkirk game against Celtic recently and just knew there was going to be a struggle for Celtic to win games.

Falkirk played them off the park that game, and how Falkirk never scored at least a couple was really fortunate for Celtic that game.

16 Feb 2026 15:43:13
Absolutely delighted how things are going, Mojo, but at the same time enjoy a good debate, and with staggering stats like that I'll always ask Qs too. U sound pretty negative too after a comeback win, so could ask you the same question about being happy closing the gap.

Some would say winning ugly is the mark of champions, so it depends on your point of view. It's going to be an exciting finish anyways, mate, whatever happens.

16 Feb 2026 16:14:02
I am downbeat because, although we closed the gap, the football has been terrible against the worst teams in the league, and we can't just keep scraping by.

I am not overall impressed with some of the January loans, so that adds to the negativity.

We are in the hunt, and if we win the game in hand we could go top, but we need to improve. Right now, and it pains me to say it, I see it finishing Rangers first, Celtic second, Hearts third, but believe me, I hope I am wrong!

16 Feb 2026 16:37:05
May your negativity only be forced to increase, Mojo, mate. 😜 😜

15 Feb 2026 22:56:13
So great game today. I've been calling out for a while for 2 up top. When balls were going up their was always players close to Chermiti. I noticed as soon as Naderi went off the very next ball went up and it was only Chermiti with nearest player about 25 yards away. I'd play 2 strikers near every game

15 Feb 2026 23:13:54
A couple of people have been calling for two up top for years.

15 Feb 2026 23:18:15
Well done for calling "we need two up top". Is the league still over?

16 Feb 2026 03:20:08
I'm sick, fed up of moaning about not playing two up top for like the last 10 years.

16 Feb 2026 08:18:34
Davie, I was right there with you, but certain people on here shout everyone down because they are going with trends and are now only agreeing with us because it's the new trend of two up and big target men.

I will, however, put my hands up to saying I thought Chermiti was nowhere good enough, and admit I could be wrong; maybe he will mature and goals will increase with time.

However, I think it's hilarious the guys at Rangers Review acting like they are saying "I told you so" to everyone on Chermiti when they had the exact same view. Only the bald guy Stevie admits to stuff; the others seem to change with the weather of public opinion.

I really like watching their show, but I'm starting to see a lot of false stuff from them. Maybe only Baldy Guy and Ginger Guy are more honest in their opinions for me and not trying to make themselves out to be something they're not.

Anyhoo, best game I've seen in years outside Celtic matches. We really should be looking at some of those Hearts players next year.

Braga reminds me of Novo 100% all the time.
Findlay wins a lot in the box and would be a good domestically trained option.
Kysiridis, although not his best game, is a good option also.
And the Icelandic boy Magnusson is another I'd be looking at.

16 Feb 2026 09:28:51
But I'm a happy clapper because you see nothing Forever, you did put a smile on my face with that post, maybe say nothing when you don't have any clue. 👍

16 Feb 2026 09:46:52
Davie, Davie, quite contrary, what do you foresee now?

15 Feb 2026 22:40:15
Chermiti 5 behind top scorer Nygren, could he possibly win top scorer come may? haha.

16 Feb 2026 08:05:32
Only if he plays against Hearts and Celtic every week.

16 Feb 2026 08:19:46
Nope, but I'll settle for winning the league and him putting in hard shifts for now.

I'm just doubting him, because every time I have, he's proved me wrong, lol.

Gladly proved me wrong at that.

16 Feb 2026 08:42:54
I would love that Stevie, but as soon as we don't win a game, the knives will be out for him. I'm only judging him on his time under Danny.
He's contributed well to the team and scored some very big goals now. That game yesterday was getting watched everywhere, so that'll be another 10m on his transfer fee. 😂

16 Feb 2026 10:59:32
We won nothing yesterday with him in the team, remember, Stevie.

16 Feb 2026 11:22:48
He hasn't, though, Baz Bear. He has had two good games since Rohl came in. Do we just forget about the others? He missed a sitter against Motherwell twice, and that cost in the end as well.

16 Feb 2026 12:20:34
Chermiti has played better in far more games than Celtic and Hearts. Clearly, those who see nothing in him do not see the work he does for the team; they must only be watching goals.

16 Feb 2026 18:21:29
He seems to be a big game player.

15 Feb 2026 21:30:41
What a difference a game makes -As I finish off my humble pie I feel its safe to say that Chermiti and Naderi are a handfull and should be paired together if possible every game as the big awkward lad that scored a hat trick today seems to thrive off the big German. Gassama did very well when he came on --god if he could burst that gut more often he wouldn't get pelters from fans.great time for them to finally turn it on in a big game.

next up is a plastic pitch so a different approach may be in order.All the best.enjoy this feeling as it may get better

15 Feb 2026 22:18:03
Humble pie for me too, Deecee. I quite like Chermiti, but thought after Weds he should've taken a seat on the bench. What do I know?! Go on the big boy.

15 Feb 2026 22:20:14
Happy for Chermiti, got the goals today, but all I ask of him is to try putting that effort in every game. I understand we all have off days at work, but the boy does have talent. I also think big Naderi helped Chermiti simply by giving Hearts' defence more to worry about.



Gassama was better coming off the bench when Hearts were pushing for an equalizer, and their backline was tiring.

One game at a time, but every game is a cup final.

15 Feb 2026 22:20:56
The same. I stand by what I have been saying about Chermiti, given what I had been watching, but what a difference today. I will gladly offer him my apologies, and I only hope he can kick on now, win us the league, and make himself a real Rangers hero.

15 Feb 2026 22:23:54
Got to agree, Deecee. We look much better as a team with two up top. I thought both complemented each other well.

We can't seem to defend balls into the box. I thought Souttar struggled to win the ball in the air and Braga beating him in the air for their second goal was criminal.



Butland's positioning is very suspect.

Skov looks terrified every time he gets the ball.

Gassama has to do that more often!

I hope today gives the players belief to really go for it.

What an atmosphere.

C'mon, Rangers, don't feck this up.

15 Feb 2026 22:42:01
Miovski and Chermiti have all the attributes to be a great partnership btw. Chermiti's work rate and Miovski's penalty box prowess should work well together, given the chance.

15 Feb 2026 23:08:23
I'd say his effort is always at that level. He's a great hold up striker, and great feet, great effort, and gets stuck in defensively.

Goals are the issue, not effort, and already he's joint 7th in the league, so let's just bear with the lad, man.

16 Feb 2026 08:20:33
Deece, I think a lot of us are eating humble pie at big Chermiti, but at least we are honest about it.

16 Feb 2026 08:22:25
Yeah, Stevie G, I think it is easy to forget he's only 21. Just remembered that when commentary said it, and again a few of us are guilty of writing him off. He seems to love the big domestic games.

16 Feb 2026 08:23:30
I thought Naderi was actually growing into the game after a poor first half. I think he will be another who needs time.

15 Feb 2026 20:41:54
I'm sure someone has the answer but why do we have Sunday games until mid April? Was hoping we would've had Saturday games to be able to get points on the board and put the pressure on like Celtic they have with us being in Europe in previous seasons.

15 Feb 2026 21:16:56
TV dictates it.

15 Feb 2026 22:03:16
Are the Aberdeen & St Mirren games not on Saturdays?

16 Feb 2026 08:25:23
Yeah that's a bit off for me too. Could it be that there are just more Rangers sympathies in England, and Sky know this for TV purposes?

Still unfair though, but no Thursday games, so same for team, just not great on traveling fans.

Let's see how Celtic cope with Thursday, Sunday, Thursday, Sunday for a few weeks.

15 Feb 2026 20:28:44
Wee point here about Danny and his squad management, if we'd won the Motherwell game and drew the Hearts game instead of the other way round, we'd be 3 points behind and not 2.

15 Feb 2026 22:16:45
Erm, how does that work?

15 Feb 2026 22:41:12
Coz, we would have the same 4 points, but Hearts would have a point extra for the draw, Bizz. Haha.

15 Feb 2026 22:48:07
Just basic maths, Bizmy.

16 Feb 2026 08:26:12
Bizzmy, that's having a mare, mate.

16 Feb 2026 08:28:50
Personally, I'd rather win both, and a win against Hearts does not let the manager off the hook for being wrong, because we will never know if it could have been so or not doing it our way.

But, let's face it, we all know Danny is the right man for next season regardless of what happens this season.

He's more than proved that for me with how calm he's been. Maybe not as many results as I've said before, but his calmness and way about him, it's hard not to like the guy.

15 Feb 2026 20:20:10
Not afraid to admit when I'm wrong I did say we will not win the league with Chermiti and Gassama but both did great today. There is no doubt Gassama on his game can do good things but he imo is better coming on in the 2nd half, he will eventually go and make us good money.

With Chermiti we have to try and play to his strengths which is giving him balls to attack, he can't play upfront himself I don't think that's his game but he has shown he can do it in the big games.

16 Feb 2026 08:29:45
I agree with a lot of that. Gassama seems to be better from the bench, as if he's trying to prove the manager wrong for benching him. He has that extra bit of desire to run at players.

15 Feb 2026 20:13:10
Chermiti was superb today. Rommens also tremendous. Still early days for ASO and appreciate he hadn't played much but haven't seen enough from him so far.

New guys aside, every player is available for sale if the numbers are right.

Massive result today and a huge performance. That needs to continue. A week to recover and prepare now. Delighted tonight getting home after that result.

15 Feb 2026 22:24:35
I also think Chukwuani had a good game today and has been an excellent addition to the squad.

16 Feb 2026 08:30:16
Rommens just looks class. His reading of situations looks quality.