No Avatar image uploaded
Rangers Rumours Member Posts
lance Armstrong's Profile
No Avatar image uploaded
Correct Score Competition
Not played Flat Out Racing
Best team moment:
lance Armstrong's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To lance Armstrong's Posts
29 Dec 2016 13:17:13
I don't get the warburton needs time supporters on here. Only 2 players left in team from previous management and that is Wallace and miller.
Full year and a half and his formation is predictable, his subs are predictable and his after the game comments are predictable
Rodgers been there 5 month still using previous management team apart from 2 or 3 players and not lost a game all season. It's not time needed it's change or the gap shall just get bigger.
1.) 29 Dec 2016 14:37:01
Mate read that back. Warburton only has 2/ 3 players of the current squad so what 20 odd new players? Since he took over, Rodgers walked into a team and made 2/ 3 signings and is flying not exactly a massive reshuffle warburton has had to deal with? So do you think we should still have law and Sheils and Nicky Clark and we'd be competing for first now?
2.) 29 Dec 2016 14:47:51
No mate. But it's his team his players his tactics. How long do you need with players? Always expected celtic to win the league but not one person on here can say they expected to be 16 possible 19 points behind at xmas.
3.) 29 Dec 2016 16:28:25
Fair enough I agree that if you look at the points we dropped minus the Celtic and hearts away games we should have been good enough to take the 3 points maybe been looking a bit more rosey points wise but doesn't help that Celtic have had their best start since o neill was manager.
4.) 30 Dec 2016 10:45:04
The problem is the quality of players at Warburton's disposal and the finance available to improve the team. He has been unlucky with injuries. Crooks, Rossiter, Krancjar and Windass would surely all have been starters ahead of guys like Halliday and Holt and although it is only guess work that they would have been any better, quite frankly they could not have been any worse.
As a squad we are currently missing at least four, possibly five, top quality players that would start games every week. We have failed to build a solid spine and that is where we are suffering the most although neither of our fullbacks are out and out defenders. Unfortunately there are not a lot of Porini's about these days and we seem incapable of scouting players outside of the UK!
We are now playing for second and that is certainly not a given with the current (fit) playing staff. I personally believe that we need three players in January, two central midfield players and a proper striker. If any players, for example Kiernan are transferred then they will also need to be replaced. We should be looking for at least two more Pre-contract signings at least English Championship quality and to put it bluntly, the Board needs to find the investment to make it happen!
01 Dec 2016 10:24:15
do you think rangers should have took the 3 million from fernebache for tav, lol.
1.) 01 Dec 2016 11:12:37
Not really. When we have a manager with a clue and the players know their roles, then guys like Tav will come on leaps and bounds.
2.) 01 Dec 2016 12:50:18
No one in their right mind would offer 3 million for Tav and I can assure you that if they had, then he would have been gone.
23 Oct 2016 19:04:53
Rangers not got much money as we all know. But for the life of me I can't understand why you would spend over 2 million on m o h and garner and not play them? Would have been better buying a decent centre half with the 2 million.
1.) 23 Oct 2016 19:31:48
I know it seemed like he wasn't, but Garner was actually on the pitch.
2.) 23 Oct 2016 20:05:13
Heard people say we will get rid of Barton in Jan but who's going to want a player who hasn't kicked a ball for 4 months. I can't see any club wanting to take a player who's so not match fit.
3.) 23 Oct 2016 22:51:12
They should be sending him all over Scotland with the under 20 and keeping the bench warm, Souness would here sorted this clown out by know!
4.) 23 Oct 2016 23:41:26
Rangers will either play him to have him in shop window or they will negotiate a deal to dump him. Mind he is in the last 2 years of his career he does not want to end his career a loser and effectively a joke so it also suits him to leave as well as it suits us
Best thing we could do is swap him for a quality defender if Burnley or similar team are prepared to do that.
23 Oct 2016 16:37:15
SuperCooper or onlyshadow, there is your stat, Rodgers after Europe 80% win rate, against rangers 100% win rate. Never seen such a one sided old firm game. 1.0 flatters rangers.
1.) 23 Oct 2016 16:58:33
We didn't believe in ourselves again and looked happy just not to get pumped again. well don to Selik (gritted teeth) but only team for me that looked as if they wanted to win it. i'm not 1 for calling for the managers head but if he's not willing to change it then we're doomed. i can just imagine Walter playing against that today. he would have wiped the floor with them.
2.) 23 Oct 2016 18:05:02
In private I'm sure warburton knows that Celtic are light years ahead of rangers and that without major investment or them getting a terrible manager in the future, we have no chance of catching them.
3.) 23 Oct 2016 23:53:18
Warburton has a 100% success rate against you lot in Scottish Cup but 0% success against Hibs. Stats can be manipulated. We beat Linfield 7-1 then you beat us 5-1 then Barcelona beat you 7-0 I am sure Linfield would not lose 19-1 to Barcelona lolol.
25 Sep 2016 16:31:53
To all the guys on here who slated brown for saying Aberdeen would be the nearest challengers, to all you who slated robbie nelson for saying rangers would need 20 million to challenge celtic. What are your thoughts now?
Not a dig just a honest question.
1.) 25 Sep 2016 17:10:04
My thoughts are we need more than 20 million to challenge Celtic.
2.) 25 Sep 2016 17:42:18
Was that a serious question? Losing to a last minute free kick to a team, last 2 years runners up, who parked the proverbial bus on the six yard line, while playing at home. I never saw anything to suggest Aberdeen will be well ahead of Rangers. They will certainly not be challenging Celtic. Celtic should probably win the league by 15 to 20 points. Rangers dominated, but lack any kind of cutting edge. Too much fancy dan play, especially from MacKay. The first 3 years after being put into div 3 were wasted. A lot of money was siphoned off, and some crooked contract awarding has handicapped Rangers big style.
Rangers should be looking at bringing decent players in, in order to make good profit. The Garner situation was a strange move at his age. Other than Celtic, no other team has started the season well. A long way to go yet. If fans want the instant money solution, we will be back to square one. Unless it is quality young players and we can triple their value, at least, when we sell them on.
3.) 25 Sep 2016 18:01:49
That is the worrying thing Cuillin, we got done over by a rank average Aberdeen team and the worrying thing is Hearts are actually a much better team than Aberdeen this season and must be favourites for second place at the moment, which means we are left fighting for third (hopefully) with Aberdeen and St Johnstone.
4.) 25 Sep 2016 18:15:47
Well said Cullin 72.
5.) 26 Sep 2016 18:08:51
Your right Aberdeen were awful yet we lost to them. Don't know how you can say they parked the bus either. What game were you watching. They didn't need to park the bus as we never really threatened them. 1 win out of 4 away with a negative goal difference. We are rank rotten and the manager hasn't got a clue what to do.
06 Jan 2017 19:56:23
Think the boy would be a good player for pangers. Remember a guy called Kenny Miller when he signed for celtic. What ever happened to him?
03 Jan 2017 15:24:02
Honestly guys. Is it not about time rangers gave up this silly mentality of everyone hates us and just move on. I know a lot of fans who don't have sky or bt yet can't even listen to the game on BBC radio scotland. If you keep wanting to boycott everything then it shall soon be that we won't be able tm see rangers anywhere. TV coverage is a massive part of brining sponsorship in.
28 Nov 2016 10:02:29
j master, that's like trying to say Andy Murray being world number 1 means nothing because Nadal and Federer were out for 6 month. or Jordan speith masters don't count because tiger woods was not playing.
27 Nov 2016 12:23:17
I believe it could happen, maybe not this year but the closer celtic get to 10 in a row then the desperation could kick in. I know from the past that the thought of rangers doing 10 in a row was the worst time of my football days and I'm sure most honest rangers fans shall say the same about celtic doing 10 in a row.
14 Nov 2016 18:29:49
Find it funny everyone going on about players in Jan when most of you are saying give warburton time to get the team up to speed, surely another 3 or 4 players shall put him further behind getting the the team up to speed?
18 Jan 2017 19:21:47
Manky mob, tramps, that's very original😅😅
06 Jan 2017 19:52:44
These scumbags probably don't even go and watch football. That's why I come on here because it's banter but also a lot of good guys on here.
31 Dec 2016 17:13:33
Can't comment on the young boy as not seen enough of him but reports are that he is a class player when fit db1311.
31 Dec 2016 16:29:21
Qualified for C L. Won league cup. 58 out of 60 points and that's with the world's greatest back in the league. Can't handle pressure. Bring back Ronny I hear you say. ha ha Brilliant. 😂.
31 Dec 2016 16:13:38
2 or 3 players from being a force? You have only 2 or 3 players I would keep. Miles behind mate. Armstrong is like a new signing for celtic.