Rangers Rumours Member Posts

 

RTID71's Profile

Current Avatar:
No Avatar image uploaded



RTID71's Posts and Other Poster's Replies To RTID71's Posts

 

 

To RTID71's last 5 rumours posts

 

To RTID71's last 5 banter posts

 

To RTID71's last 5 rumour replies

 

To RTID71's last 5 banter replies

 

RTID71's rumours posts with other poster's replies to RTID71's rumours posts

 

08 Jun 2025 21:33:28
What about Joe Aribo? Does this have any legs at all, or is it just paper talk?

RTID71

1.) 08 Jun 2025 22:06:03
There is talk of the return of an ex player, but I don't think it's Aribo.


2.) 08 Jun 2025 22:18:21
None at all.


3.) 08 Jun 2025 22:37:26
Ehl cannot tease us like that, also it's definitely gazza.


4.) 08 Jun 2025 22:46:38
Paterson likely.


5.) 08 Jun 2025 22:49:12
Give us clues EHL.


6.) 08 Jun 2025 22:53:52
Think it's Kasanwirjo?


7.) 08 Jun 2025 23:00:38
EHL, Will we be pleaded?


8.) 08 Jun 2025 23:20:07
Thinking the same TrueBlue.


9.) 08 Jun 2025 23:54:35
Sima? He's going into the final year of his contract at Brighton.


10.) 09 Jun 2025 01:43:19
Pls let it be Kasa, imo a tremendous player.


11.) 09 Jun 2025 02:16:13
I'll go for Weiss or Naismith ?.


12.) 09 Jun 2025 03:21:00
Would love it to be Fashion Sakala. Perfect for the pressing style of Martin.


13.) 09 Jun 2025 04:13:51
I'm hoping it's big bassey ??.


14.) 09 Jun 2025 07:03:32
Huistra, I don't think there's any move I'd be confident would please our fans.

Btw, I wasn't thinking of Kasa, so it's another.


15.) 09 Jun 2025 07:22:33
Cantwell is my guess.


16.) 09 Jun 2025 07:39:50
It's Jordan Rossiter, 8-10 days away apparently!


17.) 09 Jun 2025 07:52:30
Dado, I thought Bassey as well.


18.) 09 Jun 2025 08:02:12
Josh Windass.


19.) 09 Jun 2025 08:09:30
Cerny.


20.) 09 Jun 2025 08:12:03
Would love it to be Bassey but after the season he has had not a chance we could afford him. think Fulham would be starting the bidding at 25/ 30 mil.


21.) 09 Jun 2025 08:42:51
Of any move that is likely, I would actually take Windass. I hope it's not cantwell, he's a pie.


22.) 09 Jun 2025 08:43:02
Hopefully not kasan after his injuries.

Hopefully not cerny due to the cost.


23.) 09 Jun 2025 08:48:36
If not Kasanwirjo EHL, I'm going for Sima maybe wishful thinking on my part.


24.) 09 Jun 2025 08:51:29
Give up he can't say.


25.) 09 Jun 2025 09:00:12
Fast forward a million years… still isn't Bassey. EHL isn't filling me with confidence, don't want to play this game ?.


26.) 09 Jun 2025 09:31:49
Morelos.


27.) 09 Jun 2025 09:39:42
I wouldn't be surprised at Ryan's Kent. He was Gerry
Good at his off the ball work and the high press.


28.) 09 Jun 2025 09:41:13
Kamara?


29.) 09 Jun 2025 09:48:07
Ryan hardie.


30.) 09 Jun 2025 09:52:44
Be too old by then sollof to suit the new model.


31.) 09 Jun 2025 09:58:58
Would love to have both Kasa and Sima back.


32.) 09 Jun 2025 10:14:17
John Fleck?


33.) 09 Jun 2025 10:39:29
Yeah my Bassey comment was very much wishful thinking, more chance of it being Scott Arfield just now.


34.) 09 Jun 2025 10:55:01
Kamara.


35.) 09 Jun 2025 11:00:35
Ryan Hardin round be great. Kent I would accept also.


36.) 09 Jun 2025 11:28:53
Will he have to hand in his CV?


37.) 09 Jun 2025 12:01:55
I will go for Gerry Good too.


38.) 09 Jun 2025 12:04:45
Morelos.


39.) 09 Jun 2025 12:14:45
Patterson or Kamara is my guess. maybe Sakala.


40.) 09 Jun 2025 12:20:39
Kamara just went to Saudi.


41.) 09 Jun 2025 12:21:04
Jon McLaughlin unattached! 'mon then.


42.) 09 Jun 2025 12:52:37
Anybody who would take Windass back have short memories and no ambition .


43.) 09 Jun 2025 14:22:58
Goldson.


44.) 09 Jun 2025 15:17:09
Out of all listed players who played for Rangers in the last 4 years who could it be that EHL is hinting at returning to the club?
Sima, Kamara, Goldson, Sakala, Cantwell, or Hardie
The most logical one would be Aribo but that's a NO according to EHL.


45.) 09 Jun 2025 15:43:10
Sakala and Matondo just need 2 more for a relay team.


 

 

16 Apr 2025 22:21:47
@Asa, This carefully constructed pending announcement you mention, surely they won't do it when the other mhob win the league? It would melt that lot down. ???.

RTID71

1.) 16 Apr 2025 22:56:40
There league win will be irrelevant news when it breaks.


2.) 16 Apr 2025 23:36:50
They are already in melt down mate. No longer smell the glove. Its smell the fear lol.


3.) 17 Apr 2025 03:32:58
Bring it on troops ?.


4.) 17 apr 2025 03:52:09
they're irrelevant in my house anyway, always have and always will be.


5.) 17 Apr 2025 05:25:18
Correct TT12 that lot are irrelevant and have always had a terrible dose of 'RANGERSITIS' ? obsessed with the famous and always have been whereas i couldn't care less about them, all about the Rangers ???.


6.) 17 Apr 2025 09:31:28
Celtic WHO.


7.) 17 Apr 2025 10:24:27
I hope the impending announcement is a huge Glasgow Rangers banner on the moon, that would get it right up the manky mob. Exciting times ahead.


8.) 17 Apr 2025 10:54:43
The deal isn't done until it's done.


 

 

20 Feb 2025 10:25:23
The Leeds fans on Reddit are freaking out, they don't seem to like us much (LMAO) And think we are the "s**m club of the uk". They obviously are a young fan base as I can remember the violence they were notorious for and they still have an element like every club does, Now we all know the owners of the 49ers will not take any notice of what the Leeds fans think as it's all about money at the end of the day and no one cares how they make it just as long as they do.

We are an easier route into the Champions League (CL) plus we are also a founding club of the CL and one of the stars on the CL ball, so looking at it that way gives the Americans the chance to adopt an elite club for what they will see as buttons and we also have a global fan base something Leeds can't claim to have, so there are definitely many pluses for in an investment front for them.

The only thing that could scupper investors like this is the blazers in Scottish football and I'd imagine the mob from the East End will not be best pleased and I'm sure will be throwing as may spanner's into the works as they possibly can. Let's face it they did exactly that in 2008 for the UEFA cup final. Anyway let's just all sit back and watch OUR board hopefully not make a mess of this.

RTID71

1.) 20 Feb 2025 10:56:27
If anyone tries to throw spanner in the works we boycott every ground in scotland until they are all on their knees.


2.) 20 Feb 2025 11:03:02
Strange post.


3.) 20 Feb 2025 11:04:38
I think it's Leeds fans being entitled. Worried that they will divert all their funding at resources to us instead of them. I've seen some of the comments they've made and it's just laughable to be honest, a large part of it hypocritical.


4.) 20 Feb 2025 11:08:14
I worked in Leeds for a month and i'm never going back it's a hellhole, worse torn face fans than Hearts or Dundee Hibs and that's almost impossible . As far as our board goes if we don't get rid soon we will have directors for socks and pants employed maybe even crisps, too many chiefs and no enough actual workers. If I got stuck in a lift with Paddy Stewart it would be hell.


5.) 20 Feb 2025 11:49:06
I'm a Leeds fan and all the Leeds fans I know don't seem to be bothering for me it's a great thing both my clubs under one ownership. I also know a lot of Leeds fans who are Rangers supporters and they're also thrilled.


6.) 20 Feb 2025 11:50:16
Reddit is basically a mental asylum. Chronically online losers who live in the propaganda fuelled echo chamber of it. I'd not worry about them, they probably haven't showered this year yet.


7.) 20 Feb 2025 12:32:43
Sam, I was a big Leeds fan as a boy and still like them to do well. I've posted a couple of things on their pages when Glen Kamara and didn't have a problem with them. As you say most of them support us and prefer us over the other lot. As the guys have said, there are undesirables in every support.


8.) 20 Feb 2025 12:50:01
Rabbi, so it's the Celtic rumours page then ?.


9.) 20 Feb 2025 14:02:06
SamOfOrange, my cousins are leeds utd season ticket holders and also support Rangers up here ? They've always told me that the majority of leeds utd supporters prefer Rangers over Celtic and it's the irish bit of leeds that prefers celtic, with the traditional british leeds utd supporters preferring Rangers ? From what you know Sam, would you agree with that mate ???.


10.) 20 Feb 2025 14:05:51
Seeker my favourite english club is newcastle utd as you'll probably have gathered mate but my second favourite english club is leeds utd ? From a young age i've had a soft spot for leeds utd through my cousins and also a lot of good scottish players played for leeds when i was a young boy ???I always got the feeling Seeker, that the majority of leeds supporters preferred us over Celtic ???.


11.) 20 Feb 2025 14:19:58
Any Leeds fan I've ever met has Rangers as their second team and most on Twitter all seem to be pro rangers. Reddit is a left wing he'll hole so no suprise they have no love for our team.


12.) 20 Feb 2025 15:49:25
Nothing wrong with Leeds at all, my wife's main office is there she is down quite a bit and I have been down a couple of times. People are great.


13.) 20 Feb 2025 15:49:49
I thought Reddit was for recipes.


14.) 20 Feb 2025 16:09:40
They would need to get a deal done with king and park the 2 big shareholders I can see it fizzling out.


15.) 20 Feb 2025 16:12:49
I've only got one favourite club I couldn't care less about any other club.


16.) 20 Feb 2025 16:26:00
Fraser why would the need a deal with king and park, I'm very confused.


17.) 20 Feb 2025 16:34:53
Fraser, people in and around the club today seemed pretty convinced that King has agreed to sell.


18.) 20 Feb 2025 16:43:15
Orange, mint or raisin?


19.) 20 Feb 2025 17:49:06
Sir Walter I agree with that it's mostly the Irish that travel over and the Irish that have settled in leads that prefer Celtic. My grandad was a big Leeds man and I've been fortunate my self to attend a few play off finals and get to watch a really decent standard of football under bielsa. I was only really old enough to get into football properly after Leeds had just gone down so I spent a fair share of my teenage years with both my clubs in turmoil but it seems both are on the rise again and I'm looking forward to it ? glen kamara was well liked at Leeds he just had the unfortunate issues that he was playing in a midfield with ampadu who is a very similar player but probably a lot better and kamara was supposed to be the ball carrier and some one to create chances.


20.) 20 Feb 2025 18:28:41
Sam from what you believe from attending the leeds games if going with percentages to leeds utd supporters preference between Rangers and Celtic what would you say the percentages would be mate ? The reason i'm asking is my cousin's say it's around 75% in favour of Rangers and obviously 25% in favour of them, would that also be accurate in your eyes mate ?.


21.) 20 Feb 2025 19:21:08
Who even goes on Reddit?


22.) 20 Feb 2025 21:50:26
Sir Walter ye around 75s most of the rugby lads seem to be Tim's or don't take a side because they're too stuck up ?.


 

 

16 Jan 2025 21:42:30
This Man Utd team are utter dross, Now i'm hoping the Rangers team that Destroyed OGC Nice is the team that turns up against Man Utd, And not the team who drew with Motherwell and Dundee, as i believe we win that! And as i post this Man Utd score.

RTID71

1.) 16 Jan 2025 22:50:21
Let's hope diallo isn't playing.


2.) 16 Jan 2025 23:22:26
Man u are there for the taken THURSDAY NIGHTS IS RANGERS NIGHT

i. ll be going for a straight win for the ger55 v the manky utd.


3.) 17 Jan 2025 00:21:13
Hatrick in 12 minutes tonight Stevie.


4.) 17 Jan 2025 00:22:58
Who are we playing at CB?


5.) 17 Jan 2025 05:25:22
The stoppable force meets the moveable object.


6.) 17 jan 2025 06:30:19
man utd couldn't possibly be worse than nice, they virtually chucked it.


7.) 17 Jan 2025 07:16:10
If dialo hadn't turned up last 15, utd were never scoring, they weren't that gd, well Eriksens ball for the 2nd aside.


8.) 17 Jan 2025 07:32:53
They'll get a lot of chances against our defence.


9.) 17 Jan 2025 08:19:02
I've said previously. Amad will come back to haunt us, especially if we have a makeshift defence .
Anyhoo, fingers crossed.


10.) 17 Jan 2025 08:33:43
they are still trying to learn the way that Amorim wants to play. unfortunately they seem to be getting there although they don't have the exact players for how he does want to (sound familiar) . But I think if we contain them, transition quickly and hit on break we have a real chance. by contain I don't necessarily mean sit in with a low block but mix that with the high press we have used so effectively in these games. another performance like Tottenham would do me as a start.


11.) 17 Jan 2025 08:54:42
Fort they still had 9 shots on target against a team our players struggle getting into.


12.) 17 Jan 2025 09:21:42
Shots are not goals. Yes, 14 in total, Southampton had 23. Your point is? Up till last 15 they were poor, Southampton had not met an inspired onana the game would've been over at half time.


13.) 17 Jan 2025 09:34:09
??? Fork shots on target ain't goals??? Southampton are a far better side than Rangers though.


14.) 17 Jan 2025 09:39:02
9 shots on target =3 goals I'm taking that every game.


15.) 17 jan 2025 09:39:23
i certainly don't think southampton are a fa4 better team than rangers,


16.) 17 Jan 2025 09:47:16
star that is opinion which you try to make sound like fact. if as you and Fork agree they had 9 shots against a team whose average shots against is about 18.7 in the league. Southampton average shots for is 9.7 so to have 23 shows how poorly United defend as a team. unless we play them or we get into the EPL it is just opinion that they are better than us.


17.) 17 Jan 2025 09:50:22
Yeah Beale seem that when checking the coupon mate he's fair came on leaps n bounds hasn't he.


18.) 17 Jan 2025 09:51:24
Tom, name any Rangers players that gets in the Southampton side? Be lucky if we have a few, that tells me Southampton are a far better side.


19.) 17 Jan 2025 10:06:31
Angus, I'm not saying it is a fact, but what I'm saying is how Rangers players get in the Southampton team? that is telling me Southampton are a far better team.


20.) 17 Jan 2025 10:07:19
oh and someone did a study in the EPL of shots leading to goals across six Premier League seasons, 2017-2018 through 2022/ 2023. Only 11.37% of shots hit lead to a goal but if the shot is on target then there is a 26.26% chance it will become a goal. so United had a 33.33% conversion rate last night of shots on target which is above average (2.36 goals) whilst the 5 which Southampton had should have equated to 1.3 goals (I know you can get .3 of a goal) .
the point is that the more shots you have on target will based on the laws of average lead to more goals so shots on target are very important.


21.) 17 Jan 2025 10:17:34
Igamane up front, Cerny on right wing, Raskin in CM, Jefte as left back, Butland in goals. Is Bednarek better than Souttar?
Sulemana and Dibling up front scored 2 goals in the league this season between them so even Dessers might get a chance in that team ?.


22.) 17 Jan 2025 10:19:30
Exactly Angus, but he doesn't see that bud. Why u repeating what I said? Shots are not goals, newsflash they are not goals! Where does it say they are, is this a new rule in your nut?What was your point, u have not answered. Utd were poor and only turned up last 15 that's a fact not a narrative.


23.) 17 Jan 2025 10:20:11
Aribo got in??.


24.) 17 Jan 2025 10:25:51
Would be a totally different game tbh, if we played Southampton in a league game they wouldn't be sitting back, it would be like a European game and we know how much better we are with some space in behind a defence. I reckon if every game in our league was like a European game we wouldn't be in this position we are in.


25.) 17 Jan 2025 10:32:50
So last night it was 9-5 to Man utd as shots on target are goals in your head. Realised you were wrong double posted going 9 on target for 3 goals, that about right?.


26.) 17 Jan 2025 10:36:37
Angus, I'm really not concerned about the Manchester utd Southampton game mate, my only point is Southampton are a better side than Rangers, they have players on the bench that start for us.


27.) 17 Jan 2025 10:45:26
Fork Arbio was a main player for us fgs. Igamane up front they have Archer on their bench Angus.


28.) 17 Jan 2025 10:46:21
What was the final score?


29.) 17 Jan 2025 10:50:23
Fort, what i know is Southampton are a better team than Rangers, if you think otherwise cool ?
Angus only wish we had a player like Dibling.


30.) 17 Jan 2025 10:51:32
No way but land get in goals are u mad?

Ramsdale is a far far superior keeper than butland.


31.) 17 Jan 2025 10:52:45
And if jefte was anywhere near a premier league team he'd be targeted by every single opposition manager week in week out he's not good enough, yet. He's here to learn and improve and maybe 2-3 years down line move abroad.


32.) 17 Jan 2025 10:56:42
Jefte before Walker-Peters Angus ok ?.


33.) 17 Jan 2025 11:04:05
Nice where shocking against Rangers. I doubt Rangers get anything at old Trafford.


34.) 17 Jan 2025 11:04:52
How many big chances did they have?


35.) 17 Jan 2025 11:29:36
Ramsdale over butland
Sugarawa rb no debate
Bednerak as we have no centre half's
Bellis
Kyle walker peters is leaps and bounds ahead of jefte
Raskin
Aribo
Fernandez
Cerny
Hamaza
Sulamana
That's the team right there if you'd pick the best of both sides.


36.) 17 Jan 2025 12:06:17
Sam, but you just dropped Southampton best centre midfielder in Ugochukwa.


37.) 17 Jan 2025 12:07:42
And where is Dibling Sam?


38.) 17 Jan 2025 12:20:10
Star wtf u on about I never said they were or were not better than Rangers at any point in this thread.


39.) 17 Jan 2025 12:22:48
I like to come on this site to read rumours and to laugh at the banter when it's lighthearted. Some folks on here seem to be getting more and more embroiled in argument, some of which can have a nasty undertone. Maybe some folk should think on taking a step back and maybe take things less seriously, instead of trying to always get a last word in.


40.) 17 Jan 2025 12:25:01
While we're at it you still haven't clarified your point from your first reply, not the rest the first. ?.


41.) 17 Jan 2025 12:28:15
Lets not get carried away, this Man Utd team might be poor in EPL terms but they would romp the league up here so if we could get even a point down there it would be a great result.


42.) 17 Jan 2025 12:40:49
Fork my only point being was Southampton is a better team than Rangers, and that they are.


43.) 17 Jan 2025 12:46:01
Are Southampton a better team than us, certainly richer, I personally think over two legs we would beat them, I certainly don't think Southampton are better than spurs and we should have beaten them comfortably, but in theory we shouldn't be better simply because of the financial situation in both leagues, that's why we would jump at the chance to quit this football backwater called the spl. and join the set up down south, what league who knows, I don't think many fans would be against the idea, will it happen, probably not as most clubs know through time and settling in we would be a top six club, football nowadays is all about money.


44.) 17 Jan 2025 12:50:00
star it is your opinion which is all I am saying. I prefer to stay with facts where I can as they don't require me to go back and forward to defend my opinion. this is another thread where you are continually posting to defend your opinion. I don't have problem with that per se but just so you know you can never win that. It is really difficult to change anyone's opinion.
oh and Jeff for Walker Peters, well they have a defence who have let in 47 goals this season and if I had Jefte or Souttar in my squad they would be getting a chance to try and sort that. so at the moment yes Jefte for WP and probably Soapy for Bednarek. now that is just my opinion and down need anyone to agree or disagree as that won't change. unless that is you show me stats from somewhere which says saints defence isn't an issue. good luck.


45.) 17 Jan 2025 12:50:04
Spurs put 5 past Southampton in the first half 3 days after they were second best against us. How can you say Southampton are better than us?


46.) 17 Jan 2025 12:50:09
Fork there is no point is the gang don't admit they are wrong about anything.
They just continue to argue in hope you give up and they think they have won.

??. Us v Man U is a completely different game to Man U v saints.

What I do know is Southampton would be nowhere near our position if they were playing in Europa league.


47.) 17 Jan 2025 12:50:55
not sure wsl if Dundee had 10 men out they would give them a game ?.


48.) 17 Jan 2025 13:13:34
To be fair a think we beat Southampton Star, the rest of the EPL we would be underdogs and big underdogs at top end of table, some players that were decent money in that league are average at best, the English championship has nothing special in it this season yet three of them will find themselves in prem next season.


49.) 17 Jan 2025 13:22:02
It's a debate, discussion and at times argument site, at no time have I felt there is a or has been a nasty undertone from anyone, maybe others have, I don't know, but respect your thoughts SB? we can all be nippy sweeties, it happens.


50.) 17 Jan 2025 13:24:14
Shots on target mean nothing if they are not converted so that point is meaningless. You said some of our players walk into the Celtic team, you also said Nice were a top team in a top 5 league but somehow you claim that we wouldn't get near Southampton. That doesn't make any sense.


51.) 17 Jan 2025 13:28:24
Wsl I'd cut your hand off for a point next week.


52.) 17 Jan 2025 13:30:55
Angus what i deal in is real facts, Southampton are a better side than Rangers, with a squad valued 5/ 6 times more, you deal in any facts you like mate.


53.) 17 Jan 2025 13:33:47
Brilliant thread lads, loved it. ?.


54.) 17 Jan 2025 13:38:46
David Spurs beat Manchester City 0-4 are we better than man c then?


55.) 17 Jan 2025 13:40:53
Sorry Star you can't clarify your initial response about shots, so u change it too Southampton are a better team than Rangers as your point in your discussions with me, who as it happens never mentioned or compared at anytime Rangers or Southampton. Plot truly lost bud???.


56.) 17 Jan 2025 13:51:39
Correct John??.


57.) 17 Jan 2025 13:54:47
Coldo, Rangers players do get in the celtic side, we just hammered them very easily, but slightly less in the Southampton side, that was Nice's first lose at home his season.


58.) 17 Jan 2025 13:55:50
Fork your the same as me, I'm only seeing a debate mate.


59.) 17 Jan 2025 13:56:01
This thread one of the best yet. Angus having a go at Mystar for constantly posting to defend his opinion. Nearly choked. We can't be expected to compete with Celtic because of money. but we've a bunch of players who are better than Southamptons despite their wages and spending. Only sticking to facts? Love it.


60.) 17 Jan 2025 13:57:16
Spot on Griegers? he can't see that and changed his narrative, correct Storm??.


61.) 17 Jan 2025 14:10:21
Fork how am I charging it? I said on my first post there a better side, we could beat them but they have better individual players.


62.) 17 Jan 2025 14:19:57
Fork tell me how I've changed the narrative?


63.) 17 Jan 2025 14:23:28
Maybe you do see that Fork after me reading in back mate, I only meant they had 9 shots on target against a side hardly any our players get in.


64.) 17 Jan 2025 14:46:50
The irony on this thread is off the scale kaiser ?.


My star it's not a fact Southampton are better than rangers that is your opinion and that is all. Just because you say it's fact doesn't make it a fact.


This is the best thread I have seen in a long time sit back and have a drag and enjoy.

Am oan the toffee popcorn the now.


65.) 17 Jan 2025 14:48:41
Ps football is a team game Mystar you allegedly playing pro should know that so having better individual players means nothing unless they can play as a team which they don't.


66.) 17 Jan 2025 14:50:21
Yeah not the first time either Fork.

Can I just add that you can't apply the theory that because we beat Celtic then our players get in their team and then totally dismiss the same theory stating that because Spurs beat City then our players won't get in the City team.

Its the same theory you have applied to one argument and then dismissed in the next argument.

I thought you said no players get in the Southampton side, now its slightly less than would get in the Celtic side. Have you changed your mind?


67.) 17 Jan 2025 14:50:39
Star the best rangers team beats Southampton imho.


68.) 17 Jan 2025 14:51:35
Storm well far better individual players then.


69.) 17 Jan 2025 15:16:35
Thank you at least you see what I'm on about bud, like u its just a debate mate?? no worries.


70.) 17 Jan 2025 15:24:46
No sure if Soton would get the better of us over 2 legs or no? might no be much in it.
Man U away, just hope we can come back up the road with our pride intact, anything more would be a bonus.


71.) 17 Jan 2025 15:26:52
Coldo, Raskin Souttar Cerny Igamane gets in the celtic team, probably only Cerny gets in the Southampton team maybe Raskin.


72.) 17 Jan 2025 15:55:32
Ok I'll be Coldo. You said none of our players get in the Southampton team. Now you've changed your mind.

You made a point about shots on target that had no meaning.

You said Southampton have a better team than Rangers even though you were using our draw against Spurs as a measure of how good our players are. Spurs beat Southampton.

You then contradicted your own theory about how our players get in the Celtic team because we beat them.

So you've made all these points, went to lengths to defend your opinion only to back track on all the points you made.


73.) 17 Jan 2025 16:21:31
I agree it is just a debate and highly enjoyable. Fills in the time I have when I break from the day job.
Kaiser I can see the irony in me hauling up Star for continually posting whilst I do the same but I try to bak it by facts.
The fact that Southampton have a higher value squad doesn't mean they are better it just means they have more money. Idah or Igamane being one example of that.
oh and shots on target do mean something as 26.26% of the end up as goals so therefore theoretically at least the more you hit the target the more goals you score.


74.) 17 Jan 2025 16:49:50
What do you mean you will coldo? lol man you're 100% coldo.


75.) 17 Jan 2025 16:50:21
Was only a month ago Mystar said no Rangers player gets in the celtic side. Now Soutter a man that hasn't played in over a month gets in. If Cerny can get in the celtic side then why doesn't celtic try to sign him? They have the money to do so.


76.) 17 Jan 2025 17:00:05
Cerny doesn't get in Celtic team maybe the bench but not 1st 11. Raskin doesn't either at this moment of time neither does igamane or souttar as he is injury prone.
Thats my opinion.
The 4 you mentioned Mystar get on their bench and if you had to ask Celtic fans a big majority would probably agree.

The problem with you and I have always said this is you think your opinion is only one that matters and only one that is correct. When it's just an opinion like everyone else.


77.) 17 Jan 2025 17:34:11
Who said no Rangers player gets into the celtic team coldo? that is just nonsense man, you know i posted Souttar was the best cb in Scotland, pissing myself man because they have the cash they can sign Cerny, deary dear ????.


78.) 17 Jan 2025 17:46:21
Storm I really couldn't give a toss what any celtic fan says, that does not change my opinion, and a fit Yilmaz is a better player than Taylor and Jefte isn't far of either, there isn't much in they sides, as seen when hammering them very easily.
You maybe think that Storm but Rodgers get Cerny talent in his team.

Storm obviously it my opinions or I wouldn't post what am saying ?.


79.) 17 Jan 2025 18:09:43
There's 13 points between them. Losing an argument let's call everyone Coldo. It's absolutely embarrassing. It's like a calling card for Ed to ban us.


80.) 17 Jan 2025 18:21:57
my star it is your opinion and I respect it and love the fact you are so passionate about it. so much so you say it as if it is the truth. like all today though this thread has been a right laugh and if we could have them all like this without the bad feeling it would be great. and Fork hasn't even tried to do his normal stirring ?.


81.) 17 Jan 2025 18:23:44
You are coldo why would ed bar you? you're worked out in a couple of posts, you're the only embarrassing thing here.

Remember me on what argument am losing?


82.) 17 Jan 2025 19:09:38
Angus only my opinion mate, you know there's never any bad feeling from me, apart from that ahole coldo lol.


83.) 17 Jan 2025 19:13:12
I thought I was Coldo?.


84.) 17 Jan 2025 19:52:14
Coldo is good for having a couple of users names running together.


85.) 17 Jan 2025 20:41:32
U are lol?.


 

 

02 Oct 2024 11:32:39
From what iv seen on sky news, last night's CL result involving the super duper c*ltic, was carnage and could seriously been double figures. Beating Dortmund isn't for everyone though. ?

Now the harsh reality is Scottish football is going to lose CL altogether unless the standard of the league improves. The guys earning the big bucks at Hampden better start earning their money or we are all losing out.

RTID71

1.) 02 Oct 2024 13:12:24
RTID Uefa don't help either as they make it more difficult for smaller nations to get into league set up. Top 5 nations getting 5 places etc means there is less room for the rest of us. SFA have questions to answer to try and make teams in the league play more kids as the SPL format doesn't encourage that IMO.

The positive little as it is that we might end up playing in Europa groups and conference league where we pick up more wins and move up table again getting into top 15 which gets ECL qualification. money not the same from qualifying but perhaps more win prizes.


2.) 02 Oct 2024 15:47:32
The reality is both teams are miles off it. We took a mauling off Liverpool and became the worst team in champions league history (hoping Slovan Bratislava keep up their form though).

Celtic have started the season fantastically, but it shows the absolute gulf in class at that level because that was a humiliation. This is what we need to avoid against Spurs and Man U as make no mistake. These are a class above us and even Celtic again.


3.) 02 Oct 2024 15:57:45
It was men vs boys. The game was over after 11 mins. At least when we got humped by Liverpool (who i would say were better back then than Dortmund are now), we scored first and i don't remember it being a total slaughter until Salah came on and scored his hat trick. LOL.


4.) 02 Oct 2024 17:55:33
Personally I'm otm they got pumped but I wish we had a team who could bear them and not rely on others as fir Europe the CL is about making as much money as possible and the EL is our standard ATM.


5.) 02 Oct 2024 18:21:10
We were doing not too badly against Liverpool until Goldson had to go off injured.
Its all opinions of course but I reckon the Dortmund team we beat in Dortmund was better than that one last night.


6.) 02 Oct 2024 18:25:03
Celtic made it easy for them, Dortmund passed through their press easily and had three + on two all the time, great to watch even better if we could do it.


7.) 02 Oct 2024 19:01:56
I agree lads but what is the point in getting into the champions League to get pumped every time ok money? Buy better players? Not happening? Seems like a total catch 22 to me a very vicious circle has been for ages.


8.) 02 Oct 2024 19:04:06
That Dortmund team were in champs league final a few months ago the team we beat was in Europa league I don’t know how anyone can say they were better then. Maybe with haaland but he never played against us at that time.


9.) 02 Oct 2024 19:36:32
storm they lost at least 6 of that team at end of season, Hummels, Fullkrug, Reus, Sancho, Maatsen and Sabitzer. so they were a new team last night. in the team we played they had Bellingham, Guerrero, Akanji and Malen with Brandt, Reus and Hummel a good few years younger and Germany internationals. so about opinions but I think that team were better as well.


10.) 02 Oct 2024 19:57:52
Sabitzer came on as a sub Angus.


11.) 02 Oct 2024 20:32:23
I'm sure Dortmund were in the semi final the season before we played them, they dropped down into the Europa the season we played them, not much in with that side and the side last night.


12.) 02 Oct 2024 21:01:43
Maatsen was a loan. Reus hasn’t been the same player for 2/ 3 years because of injuries and sabitzer is still there. Hummels 36/ 37 and fullkrug they replaced with a better striker so don’t get your point Angus ?

You are entitled to your opinion but the team you thought was better couldn’t even get in champs league so it’s bs ?.


13.) 02 Oct 2024 21:03:48
You would be wrong my star it was Man City Real Madrid Chelsea and psg ?

Ps it’s not hard to check before you post.


14.) 02 Oct 2024 21:04:56
It was 1/4 finals they got to mystar ?.


15.) 02 Oct 2024 21:56:08
cheers Fork knew he was in the team when we played them and never saw him in starting line up last night so thought he had moved on after Man Utd loan. It does explain why I read somewhere 5 had moved on when I had 6 in my list now.


16.) 02 Oct 2024 21:59:56
Was goi g to reply to the post further down but thought I’d start a new one so everyone sees it

Regarding the Celtic game last night I don't think theirs much in it either My star from last nights team. To the one we played?

Wee need to give ourselves more credit when it’s due
Our Europa league ventures are right up their
our team came alive in those nights and we matched everyone who crossed our paths and bet them when we had to up until the final where we only just lost out

Guys we played fkn well in those games and not just the run up to the final but results in precious years Europa campaigns and gave those teams a game who had much more money spent on them yet we still made it to the final with some excellent displays and results
don’t kid ourselves or down play it Celtic right now have a good squad and good depth but they have made a fortune off the back of us bringing Scotlands coefficient right up and giving them access to champs league football without the qualification rounds
It’s just a bloody nightmare our league form hasn't matched our European form/ results or we could have seen the fruits of our own labour

even against last week against Malmo we played some good football created loads of chances
we really seem suited to European football more now than Scottish league football
some say it’s because teams park the bus against us
Celtic don’t yet we struggle against them

Anyone ever thought recently stick a European top on Celtic call it a Europa game and I do wonder how we would fair ? Joking kind of ?

European football we just raise a bar that we can’t find domestically that’s very frustrating and been like that while now and because of it Celtic find themselves in the thick of champs league football where they struggled and come back to domestic and score 5-6 etc
Celtic in Europa haven’t even Been great either before anyone mentions its champs league

Anyway dortmund I agree with my star not a lot in it and we held our own.


17.) 02 Oct 2024 22:02:18
My star they made it to 1/ 4s where they were beaten by Man City. they dropped out of ECL groups the season we played them.


18.) 02 Oct 2024 22:08:22
We were doing brilliantly in the Cl against liverpool until both Goldson and Jack went off with long tetm injuries. That was the baw burst for the rest of the tournament.


19.) 02 Oct 2024 22:10:10
No worries bud.


20.) 02 Oct 2024 22:38:09
Why check storm?


21.) 03 Oct 2024 00:53:06
Only reason Celtic even got into the champions league was Purely due to Rangers success in the Europa league under Gerrard in the first 2 seasons, let's be honest though neither Celtic or Rangers are on the level required for a succesful Champions league campaign.

lets not forget the season Celtic dropped out of all 3 competitions at the first stage, that is still a scottish epic fail record ;)


22.) 03 Oct 2024 08:27:10
Storm. the point being is that you said that that team were in the Champions league final a few months ago. However they lost 5 of those players so it isn't that team in fact probably only half that team. those players you write off to try and win the 'argument' BTW were good enough to reach the ECL final, let's see if this group manage that. that's The thing about having this type of opinion sometimes you only have to wait until the end of the season to see who is right.

you are correct it is my opinion that Bellingham, Akanji, Guerrero and a younger Hummels, Brandt and Reus who 2 or 3 years ago according to you was better then make the team we beat better than the one on Tuesday. this is one where we'll never know but that is what the forum is about having different opinions with everyone thinking theirs is right.


23.) 03 Oct 2024 08:30:49
My star there is no reason to and if you are wrong then other posters can let you know (politely) I knew from what you had written you were doing it from memory. It then spurred my interest so I checked as it is what I like doing. filled in 5 minutes of my work day so thanks ?.


24.) 03 Oct 2024 12:42:04
Get involved with MLS rather than UEFA competition, don't need to travel by Titanic style now. That market is massive and much more entertaining. We are priced out of competing in Europe and the gubbing the beggars got will happen more and more. That should have been 12-1.


25.) 03 Oct 2024 12:44:06
Laudruphagi - the only reason Celtic are in the champions league is because they keep winning the league and whilst they may have been knocked out of all 3 competitions, we currently are the worst team in champions league history.


26.) 03 Oct 2024 17:32:54
Tav123, we will see next year if they are still there when the automatic place disappears which was there for them from the coefficient we built up in the last 5 years. once they have to play qualifiers then they might not make the groups if they don't get an easy draw. then their automatic £20-£40M depending what you read will disappear as well. So the point Laudruphagi makes has merit as it was one of the reasons which meant Celtic made the group stages.


27.) 03 Oct 2024 19:33:26
Why check my star? So you don’t look like a clown getting it wrong that’s why. ?

Angus 5 players don’t make a team these days it’s the full squad.

I ain’t trying to do anything as I know I am right on this but thanks for trying ? also if they had better than those 5 they may have won it instead of getting beat in final.


28.) 04 Oct 2024 10:42:48
? did I say I'm positive or sure storm?


29.) 04 Oct 2024 18:13:24
Yeah my star it’s you. You barely ever get anything right on here.


30.) 04 Oct 2024 20:07:53
Aye ok storm?, your just a clown to serval on here that's all.


 

 

 

RTID71's banter posts with other poster's replies to RTID71's banter posts

 

03 Jul 2025 10:58:18
Heartbreaking news regarding Diogo Jota, only married 3days. ?.

RTID71

1.) 03 Jul 2025 11:56:27
That is devastating news. I am stuck for words.


 

 

02 Jul 2025 18:38:39
@sws, Is that not where Thor lived? ?.

RTID71

1.) 02 Jul 2025 18:53:44
Thats asgard ??.


2.) 02 Jul 2025 19:03:16
Never mind I've had a nightmare ?.


3.) 02 Jul 2025 19:42:30
Aye loki yourself up??.


4.) 02 Jul 2025 20:35:01
Muscat you deserve to be hammered for that.


5.) 02 Jul 2025 20:54:43
Ive had a hella of a time ?.


 

 

12 Jun 2025 08:24:38
Remember we don't really need to sell our MVP's, if the numbers online are true then that's us as a club saying " these are our figures", if no one bites then they stay, and they will only get better and become more expensive. That's the way I'm looking at the whole window, except for the dead wood. Speaking of deadwood, Looks like RM wants to have a look at Davies for his defence. Does the lad deserve a second look?

RTID71

1.) 12 Jun 2025 08:54:23
I liked Davis. Underrated. Would he be happy away from family again? I'd be happy to see him back with a pay cut.


2.) 12 Jun 2025 08:56:46
I don't think we should, if Birmingham are interested in making the move permanent I would take that option


however is there much of an option in the backline.


3.) 12 Jun 2025 09:10:01
The good thing now is with the new board we don't have to sell on the cheap. Before other clubs knew we needed money and unter cut us all the time. Also not letting players leave for free is must. With 2 years left on a contract they either sign a new one or they are moved on.


4.) 12 Jun 2025 10:16:11
They must do nothing, if they don't want to leave then they are not obliged to go. we are bad or were at paying over the odds on salary to get the player here and then have issues moving him on because he can't get that salary elsewhere. would you take on a new contract losing thousands per week, don't think so.


5.) 12 Jun 2025 12:12:48
Why would he take a pay cut? I assume he'd expect The Club to honour his contract, they offered him the contract he signed.


 

 

04 Jun 2025 16:44:08
Don't Panic! It changes Nothing. We back the manager whomever it is, it's all we can do.
??????.

RTID71

 

 

03 Jun 2025 11:52:40
If these rumours are true regarding Martin, Tommo and Davis. I will back them 100%. Martin has a style of play, my concern is his defensive record last season was shocking. He is not my preferred candidate but as a support we have to give him time and backing.

RTID71

1.) 03 Jun 2025 12:09:06
Defensive record with the smallest budget in the strongest league in the world. Were always have favs to go down.


2.) 03 Jun 2025 12:10:16
If its him hell be looking at the sack in 6 to 8 months imo stupid choice.


3.) 03 Jun 2025 12:11:27
Well said rtid, I personally like his style of play very aggressive will suit us, let's get behind him and his team, Bright future ahead bear's ?.


4.) 03 Jun 2025 12:14:27
Absolutely, whoever is in charge has to be backed. Marco Rose would've been my first choice of names mentioned. There will be a lot of negativity from a lot of Rangers fans. The media outlets weren't the same back in 91, but I think Walter getting manager's job wasn't exactly viewed as an overwhelming appointment.

Look how that turned out. Back whoever is in the job.


 

 

 

RTID71's rumour replies

 

Click To View This Thread

09 Sep 2024 19:17:09
@Fork, can’t see Tav leaving now, but I can see him leaving in January.

RTID71

 

 

Click To View This Thread

19 Aug 2024 20:36:04
I have to admit Beale is the last person I’d believe.

RTID71

 

 

Click To View This Thread

17 Jul 2023 17:50:24
Think we have a problem here, if the lad himself wants to come he’s going to have to push for it himself, and I don’t think WE will wait. Shame if we don’t wait as he would suits Beale system.

RTID71

 

 

Click To View This Thread

16 Jul 2023 19:25:06
Think Souness was looking for DOF not an Ambassador role, Other than that it’s a strange one.

RTID71

 

 

Click To View This Thread

14 Jul 2023 19:43:39
£10m+ Arsenal will be looking at, seemingly a Turkish team bid £2m and it’s been thrown out, haven’t a clue what we would bid but it won’t be anywhere near double figures. 27yrs old good age as well.

RTID71

 

 

 

RTID71's banter replies

 

Click To View This Thread

05 Jun 2025 15:22:24
@storm, He comes across very well and so did Kevin Thelwell, he's our head coach and we need to just let him get on with it now. Let's see how this pans out.

RTID71

 

 





Change Consent